Politics

Politics

  • Obama

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • Romney

    Votes: 172 48.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 46 13.1%
  • a:3:{i:1637;a:5:{s:12:"polloptionid";i:1637;s:6:"nodeid";s:7:"2882145";s:5:"title";s:5:"Obama";s:5:"

    Votes: 130 36.9%

  • Total voters
    352

Ndaccountant

Old Hoss
Messages
8,370
Reaction score
5,771
Illinois.....that state's government is as useful as a mint-flavored suppository.

Kay: Leader Currie, I believe you were presenting the bill yesterday. So I'm going to Page 7 and I'm asking, when you have a state that's penniless, why you'd be looking at a pilot program at this point and time for $2.6 million?

Currie: Because it has value.

Kay: I see. How about Page 13 Section 120, the sum of $750,000 for the fairgrounds in Du Quoin. Is that something we spend when we're penniless? Does that have value?

Currie: Continuing appropriation.

Kay: Well, does that have value?

Currie: Clearly it did or it would never have been in the budget.

Kay: How about Page 14, $852,400 for contractual services. Can you tell me what that consists of?

Currie: This is a Department of Agriculture contract. I believe it has appeared in budgets before, I believe, in the mission of the state's Department of Agriculture.

Kay: Well, my question is, though, when you're broke, when you're penniless, is this an essential element of a budget?

Currie: Apparently the governor proposed this. Maybe you should ask him.

Kay: Well, he didn't propose it twice because you've got another $476,500 in there and it's for the very same thing.

Currie: (No answer)

Kay: Well, let's move on. Let's look at Page 8. How about entertainment contracts for $696,000? Is that useful?

Currie: Yeah, I believe this is the state fair. I believe we did this last year as well. I believe it was in the governor's budget.

Kay: Well, we've done the same thing every year, leader, and that's why we're in the hole we're in. That's why I ask these questions. Certainly, certainly, when you're talking about $7 billion in the hole and more, counting, we ought to be giving this some thoughtful, I think, more thoughtful concern, don't you?

Currie: Why don't you speak to the local representative in whose district that fair appears?

Kay: I'll do that. I'll take that under advisement. Page 17, awards to livestock breeders for $221,000. Essential?

Currie: Cost of the state fair in the governor's budget.

Kay: We're penniless. Awards and premiums, $483,000. Useful?

Currie: Same answer.

Kay: Excuse me. There's another ... there's another line item for the same amount so I guess we're off on our accounting already. So the total here is $883,500 and this is all useful to you when we're in a deep hole, right?

Currie: Following the governor's lead.

Kay: Which governor?

Currie: I think his name is Rauner.

Kay: Page 18. Yeah, well, I can give you the history on a couple of other governors, too, so we don't want to go there today, though. Page 18, breeders fund grant money of $1.1 million. Useful?

Currie: Ditto.

Kay: When you're broke.

Currie: (no answer)

Kay: That's nonresponsive. Breeders fund, $1.6 million. Same answer?

Currie: Ditto.

Kay: Another allocation here for the Department of Agriculture doesn't state what it's for: $1.7 million. What's that for?

Currie: Ditto.

Kay: What's 'ditto' mean? Useful? Not useful? Did you read this, leader? Have you read this budget? Have you read all 534 pages of this?

Currie: Yes.

Kay: How recently?

Currie: Yesterday.

Kay: And did you know our state constitution says that each representative is to have one of these on their desk before a bill is passed? Did you know that? That's in our constitution. My goodness. Let's talk about, uh, let's talk about some pretty big money here. How about rehabilitation of county fairgrounds for $1.3 million. Is that necessary?

Currie: Ditto.

Kay: How would you know that? How would you know that? Have you talked to the county fairground people?

Currie: (no answer)

Kay: Well, how about let's move on. We're having some trouble here getting a consensus as to what's useful and what's not. How about fair and state fair horse racing for $329,000 when you're broke?

Currie: Clearly some people have thought over the years that the state fairs are valuable and I can only say one more time representative, "Ditto," and may I just suggest to the chair and to the body that if you're going to go through the budget with one line after another, my answer will continue to be "Ditto" and I don't know that that is a useful expenditure of scarce legislative time.

Kay: Here's the problem and I won't, I won't, put the body through this. It's pretty obvious you've never run a business. You've never had to account for money and debt has no impact on you whatsoever, especially when it has to do with taxpayer funds. I'm not going to go through this. This is simply embarrassing.

Anyone that has been paying any attention knows that pensions are a major problem. But so is this:

<iframe src="//d2e70e9yced57e.cloudfront.net/wallethub/embed/2416/taxpayer1.html" width="556" height="347" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>
<div style="width:556px;font-size:12px;color:#888;">Source: <a href="https://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-states-to-be-a-taxpayer/2416/">WalletHub</a></div>

Speaker Madigan&apos;s budget: &apos;This is simply embarrassing.&apos; Ditto. - Chicago Tribune

https://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-states-to-be-a-taxpayer/2416/
 

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
Illinois.....that state's government is as useful as a mint-flavored suppository.

<iframe src="//d2e70e9yced57e.cloudfront.net/wallethub/embed/2416/taxpayer1.html" width="556" height="347" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>
<div style="width:556px;font-size:12px;color:#888;">Source: <a href="https://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-states-to-be-a-taxpayer/2416/">WalletHub</a></div>

Speaker Madigan&apos;s budget: &apos;This is simply embarrassing.&apos; Ditto. - Chicago Tribune

https://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-states-to-be-a-taxpayer/2416/
CT represent! COL adjusted 50th!
 

Ndaccountant

Old Hoss
Messages
8,370
Reaction score
5,771
CT represent! COL adjusted 50th!

tumblr_maeo7b6r271rolf4z.gif
 

connor_in

Oh Yeeaah!!!
Messages
11,433
Reaction score
1,006
Illinois.....that state's government is as useful as a mint-flavored suppository.



Anyone that has been paying any attention knows that pensions are a major problem. But so is this:

<iframe src="//d2e70e9yced57e.cloudfront.net/wallethub/embed/2416/taxpayer1.html" width="556" height="347" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>
<div style="width:556px;font-size:12px;color:#888;">Source: <a href="https://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-states-to-be-a-taxpayer/2416/">WalletHub</a></div>

Speaker Madigan&apos;s budget: &apos;This is simply embarrassing.&apos; Ditto. - Chicago Tribune

https://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-states-to-be-a-taxpayer/2416/

Where's the rest? Aren't there 57 states?


Kidding...Levity...Poking Fun
 

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
The thumbnail and title are a bit misleading. This video is less about Milo Yiannapolous and more just a "state of discourse" from Dave Rubin.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9Bnl8p-ODWY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Some great stuff at the end. There has been an awakening. Have you felt it? I'd argue that #GamerGate was the catalyst of the reframing of our political discourse from Left - Right to authoritarian - libertarian.
 

NDgradstudent

Banned
Messages
2,414
Reaction score
165
Prepare for liberals and Democrats to declare that the "rhetoric" of Christian opponents of the Obama men-in-ladies-rooms policy played some "role" in the Orlando shooting, even though the shooter was a Muslim terrorist. This is an move on their part that goes back a long time: when JFK was assassinated some people, including his wife, openly expressed their desire that his shooter was a racist, and were upset he was 'only' a Communist. People NBC interviewed on the street also said they thought the JFK shooter was a racist and that Republican "rhetoric" caused the shooting (although the Republican guy they interview says he thinks it is probably a communist).

What can you say about American politics? Same as it ever was.
 

NDgradstudent

Banned
Messages
2,414
Reaction score
165
NDgradstudent:

You, sir, are a fucking asshole.



IE ban anticipated and gladly, proudly accepted.

Sad that a statement of opinion -in the politics thread- brings out this response in people: ban the expression of any view you disagree with.

I express my views in a wholly reasonable way and I have never violated any IE rules. Nobody is making you either read or agree with my opinions.
 
Last edited:

NDgradstudent

Banned
Messages
2,414
Reaction score
165
The issue is not how many guns there are, but who has the guns.

Vermont and Florida have very similar rates of gun ownership, but this sort of thing never happens in Vermont. There are no mass murders, the homicide rate is low, there is a very small police force, etc. Why is that? Maybe because there is no sizeable population of Islamic terrorists living in Vermont. This is something that Sen. Sanders has tried to explain while defending his pro-gun record. Vermonters are responsible enough to possess firearms. It is not fair to them to take away everyone's guns in the name of equality when in fact there is only a real and consistent threat from certain groups.
 
Last edited:
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Sad that a statement of opinion -in the politics thread- brings out this response in people: ban the expression of any view you disagree with.

I express my views in a wholly reasonable way and I have never violated any IE rules. Nobody is making you either read or agree with my opinions.

My response to the last is don't post you homophobic tripe on a site of goodwill and fellowship, and then respond like you are being unfairly treated.

The reason you are a fucking asshole is not your knee-jerk, mud sucking stupid conclusion that people would make a connection between the transgender conversation and this. No, that isn't it, although it would take a seriously unbalanced person to bring that up in public discourse, (please note who did), and it isn't because Sir dshans said so.

Although he is right on target, as usual.

It is because you came up with this whole set of this shit-filled entrails of hate filled goo disguised as logical public discourse, it is because you presupposed you could 'figure out' what not one other person, but groups of people would do.

Where one can question your logic, and sanity, is the fact that you are claiming to be able to identify and explain the behavior of many (dare I say - diverse) individuals, made only a group by your own flavored thinking.

And by the way, Jackie never acknowledged LHO was the killer. Not actually.
 
Last edited:

EddytoNow

Vbuck Redistributor
Messages
1,481
Reaction score
235
Sad that a statement of opinion -in the politics thread- brings out this response in people: ban the expression of any view you disagree with.

I express my views in a wholly reasonable way and I have never violated any IE rules. Nobody is making you either read or agree with my opinions.

You have taken a tragic event and twisted it into a partisan political statement. The shooting in Orlando was an attack on Americans. Period.
 
Last edited:

Bubbles

Turn down your lights
Messages
661
Reaction score
76
You have taken a tragic event and twisted it into a partisan political statement. The shooting in Orlando was an attack on Americans. Period.

THIS is the ONLY reasonable logical response to the post. The Ad Hominem bs by others is childish and pathetic. I lost some considerable respect for both the previous posters after their emotion-driven sputum.

NDGrad...not the time or the place. The truth will out.
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
Anyone that has been paying any attention knows that pensions are a major problem. But so is this:

<iframe src="//d2e70e9yced57e.cloudfront.net/wallethub/embed/2416/taxpayer1.html" width="556" height="347" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>
<div style="width:556px;font-size:12px;color:#888;">Source: <a href="https://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-states-to-be-a-taxpayer/2416/">WalletHub</a></div>

https://wallethub.com/edu/best-worst-states-to-be-a-taxpayer/2416/

This is a pretty fascinating image. Obviously the rural states will have lower tax rates than more developed states, so naturally Nebraska sticks out like a sore thumb. What's up in Cornhusker land?

It's also worth pairing it with the federal dependency map, to show that states with low state tax rates aren't always as fiscally sound as we might think. People are still being cared for, it's just not coming from their state capital.
 

dshans

They call me The Dribbler
Messages
9,624
Reaction score
1,181
Sad that a statement of opinion -in the politics thread- brings out this response in people: ban the expression of any view you disagree with.

I express my views in a wholly reasonable way and I have never violated any IE rules. Nobody is making you either read or agree with my opinions.

Reason and reasonable are relative terms.

Little is to be gained – make that NOTHING is to be gained by engaging a fool.

In that light, feel free to place me on your Ignore List.

This is, after all, the Lep Lounge.

Brevity is the soul of wit.

Protracted discourse is trying and all too often a waste of breath.

I'll PM my syllabus if need be.
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,009
Reaction score
5,047
This is a pretty fascinating image. Obviously the rural states will have lower tax rates than more developed states, so naturally Nebraska sticks out like a sore thumb. What's up in Cornhusker land?

It's also worth pairing it with the federal dependency map, to show that states with low state tax rates aren't always as fiscally sound as we might think. People are still being cared for, it's just not coming from their state capital.

I can explain Illinois at least. My home state is fucking stoopid.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest

In the article, this study admits that it is meaningless because of the complexities of some markets having guaranteed Medicaid providers and others not, etc. So you are looking at some areas with increases, blaming them on mandated health legislation, when in fact pricing is regulated in those areas by the same oligopolistic practices that necessitated implementation of the system in the first place. I guess the first step is better than not being able to have any insurance at all, isn't it? WTF!

I have increasingly had a problem with 'evidence presented to prove a point.' It isn't limited to this site. But it has happened here the last three times (thereabouts) I have visited the site.)

I am tired of the persona that seems to be affecting the American discourse today. The America I love. The America I have given my best to, all of my life.

Looking back, I have few if any regrets. I have made some mistakes, and done a few wonderful things. I feel I have always gotten back more than I have given, even though I have tried to give everything I had.

I have worked with poor and disadvantaged. I have worked with the terminally ill, including children. I have seen and worked with those suffering addiction. I have worked with returning vets, and those that never really came home. I have worked with those that have physical and mental limitations. I have seen how much I have in common with all of these individuals.

I have also seen at times some very basic differences we have held. Throughout the agreement and differences I have learned a lot about life, myself, and others in the world around me. Hopefully, that which is good in me rubbed off a little.

But no matter what, who, where, or when, one thing has been indisputably true. Everyone wants a common dignity; to be treated as a human being. They want to be liked or respected in turn, or not. But all people, even the most challenged, want to be identified as individuals, held positively, and be free to interact with others as they need.

When it gets to the point where everything in discourse becomes platitudes and truisms, we loose our humanity. It is too much for me to have someone inject their personal illness into the motivations of others, so their world view continues to make sense.

Sorry Sarge, and anyone else who was offended by my dust-up. It was the closest I could come to an internet bitch-slap.

Now. Getting back to fighting hypocrisy at every turn :

To: Donald J. Trump, presumptive Republican Presidential Nominee

For the past 40 years, it has been tradition that presidential nominees of both major parties release their tax returns. They do this in part to ensure the public that there are no conflicts of interest.

Your claims that you are unable to do so because of an IRS audit have been repudiated by the IRS itself. Moreover, you said that Mitt Romney should release his tax returns when he ran for president in 2012. [source]

We demand that you release multiple years of your tax returns and level with the American people about your wealth, business dealings, how you truly make your money, the tax loopholes you take advantage of, the tax rate you actually pay and how your tax plan would benefit you personally. What do you have to hide? End the hypocrisy!
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
In the article, this study admits that it is meaningless because of the complexities of some markets having guaranteed Medicaid providers and others not, etc. So you are looking at some areas with increases, blaming them on mandated health legislation, when in fact pricing is regulated in those areas by the same oligopolistic practices that necessitated implementation of the system in the first place. I guess the first step is better than not being able to have any insurance at all, isn't it? WTF!

I have increasingly had a problem with 'evidence presented to prove a point.' It isn't limited to this site. But it has happened here the last three times (thereabouts) I have visited the site.)

I am tired of the persona that seems to be affecting the American discourse today. The America I love. The America I have given my best to, all of my life.

Looking back, I have few if any regrets. I have made some mistakes, and done a few wonderful things. I feel I have always gotten back more than I have given, even though I have tried to give everything I had.

I have worked with poor and disadvantaged. I have worked with the terminally ill, including children. I have seen and worked with those suffering addiction. I have worked with returning vets, and those that never really came home. I have worked with those that have physical and mental limitations. I have seen how much I have in common with all of these individuals.

I have also seen at times some very basic differences we have held. Throughout the agreement and differences I have learned a lot about life, myself, and others in the world around me. Hopefully, that which is good in me rubbed off a little.

But no matter what, who, where, or when, one thing has been indisputably true. Everyone wants a common dignity; to be treated as a human being. They want to be liked or respected in turn, or not. But all people, even the most challenged, want to be identified as individuals, held positively, and be free to interact with others as they need.

When it gets to the point where everything in discourse becomes platitudes and truisms, we loose our humanity. It is too much for me to have someone inject their personal illness into the motivations of others, so their world view continues to make sense.

Sorry Sarge, and anyone else who was offended by my dust-up. It was the closest I could come to an internet bitch-slap.

Now. Getting back to fighting hypocrisy at every turn :


Bogs...on your Trump Hypocrisy claim...I ACTUALLY AGREE.

The basis of Mr. Trump's resume which seems to justify the confidence people place in him to lead comes from his performance as a business man. Therefore one of the critical verification items to support or refute such claims would include his taxes. I don't see how you could vote Trump without those.

What was Mr. Obama's resume built from which allowed him to gain the confidence of the American people who in turn allowed him to lead this nation...at least in part, something akin to academic and intellectual prowess...Yes? What would the documentation be to support or refute such claims? I don't see how anyone could vote for Mr. Obama without artifacts of his intellect/academic performance...BUT THEY DID...in huge numbers.

So Hypocrisy is a funny thing...as you see it in others...sometimes you live it. JMHO.
 

Ndaccountant

Old Hoss
Messages
8,370
Reaction score
5,771
This is a pretty fascinating image. Obviously the rural states will have lower tax rates than more developed states, so naturally Nebraska sticks out like a sore thumb. What's up in Cornhusker land?

It's also worth pairing it with the federal dependency map, to show that states with low state tax rates aren't always as fiscally sound as we might think. People are still being cared for, it's just not coming from their state capital.

a bit dated, but here is some info:

The website says Nebraska has the fourth-highest telecom taxes, the sixth-highest property taxes, the 13th-highest state income taxes and the 24th-highest gas taxes.

Nebraska annually makes Kiplinger's "Worst Places to Retire" list because of a high tax burden, and over the past few years the state has been named the state with the highest cellphone taxes and the second-highest property taxes.

Nebraska gets another low ranking on taxes | Local | journalstar.com
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Bogs...on your Trump Hypocrisy claim...I ACTUALLY AGREE.

The basis of Mr. Trump's resume which seems to justify the confidence people place in him to lead comes from his performance as a business man. Therefore one of the critical verification items to support or refute such claims would include his taxes. I don't see how you could vote Trump without those.

What was Mr. Obama's resume built from which allowed him to gain the confidence of the American people who in turn allowed him to lead this nation...at least in part, something akin to academic and intellectual prowess...Yes? What would the documentation be to support or refute such claims? I don't see how anyone could vote for Mr. Obama without artifacts of his intellect/academic performance...BUT THEY DID...in huge numbers.

So Hypocrisy is a funny thing...as you see it in others...sometimes you live it. JMHO.

The straw man lurking in your post is that Trump clearly told American voters to look at his business success and ethics, and those were a primary reason for Americans to vote for him. Obama said that he would use all the skills he developed from his experience to find innovative ways to solve problems. Two totally different things. Kind of like day and night. And by the way, with Obama you had his decriers making unsubstantiated claims about his past. Oh, yeah. And Obama was President of the Harvard Law Review. Not shabby. More than anecdotal evidence of intelligence.

Some times there is a fine line between banality and hypocrisy.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest

Are they blaming 'Christians' or the atmosphere fostered by some right-leaning Christian elements.

Because among the incredibly stupid things that I have heard that I totally discount :
  • It is all those people's fault, (not the gunman's), because they were gay.
  • Homosexuality is the worst sin against mankind. (Someone forgot about genocide!)
  • Muslims are full of hatred.
  • Christians are full of hatred.
  • America is totally decadent.
  • Etc.

Look. It is clear as day that there is a psychological profile, of an abused, tortured soul, cut off from normal socialization, with depressive tendencies, that would love nothing more than to commit suicide to make the pain go away.

But they cannot because their cultures morés or specifically the abuse they suffered has ingrained some behavioral stop. So the only way they can participate in their own destruction is by taking part in a 'holy war.' Then the loss of a life can be justified.

Groups like ISIS are smart and know this. They look for these people. They don't even have to recruit them! By releasing that statement that legitimized this homegrown Orlando terrorist, they have effectively said, "We don't care how fucked up you are. If you commit mass murder, we will make you a saint and a martyr for our cause."

People better get smart. Or every unhinged pencil-necked motherfucker will look to take boatloads of others with him. And their won't be any warning. Not that you would be able to see.
 

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
Because among the incredibly stupid things that I have heard that I totally discount :
  • It is all those people's fault, (not the gunman's), because they were gay.
  • Homosexuality is the worst sin against mankind. (Someone forgot about genocide!)

  • Who said any of those things, ever?
 

NDgradstudent

Banned
Messages
2,414
Reaction score
165
NDgradstudent:

You, sir, are a fucking asshole.



IE ban anticipated and gladly, proudly accepted.

I've already mentioned the tweets sent out by ACLU lawyers blaming Christians for the attack.

Now the NYT reports that gay rights "movement leaders" believe that “high-profile policy fights like the one over the Obama administration’s recent directive requiring schools to allow transgender students to use the bathrooms of their choice” played a role in this shooting.

Furthermore, the Atlantic's Emma Green claims that there is a connection "between some of the anti-gay and anti-trans rhetoric that we’ve seen in the U.S. not primarily from Muslim groups but from Christian groups that have laid a foundation for homophobia and transphobia."

It didn't take as long as I expected, but here it is; my predictions have come true.

Is an apology forthcoming?

H/T Heather MacDonald on NRO.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
That's a negatory, Rubber Ducky.



So let me get this right, he is asking for some kind of acknowledgement because he knows a few (insert your favorite euphemism for mentally ill) individuals said things (or were misquoted as saying things that are clearly so far beyond stupid that no one is bothering to listen?


Okay, I acknowledge you for having such a firm handle on such a range of mental illnesses!
 

NDgradstudent

Banned
Messages
2,414
Reaction score
165
So let me get this right, he is asking for some kind of acknowledgement because he knows a few (insert your favorite euphemism for mentally ill) individuals said things (or were misquoted as saying things that are clearly so far beyond stupid that no one is bothering to listen?

These were quotes from the NYT and NPR. So both the most important newspaper in the country and our publicly-funded radio stations are bothering to "listen" to liberals and Democrats doing what I said they would do- blaming this on Christians in some way or other.

That's a negatory, Rubber Ducky.

Well then don't threaten to ban me for making claims that are true.
 
Top