calvegas04
Well-known member
- Messages
- 11,857
- Reaction score
- 8,438
tix could be pretty cheap for this one
They have gone from $90+ for the cheapest a couple weeks ago to around $70 now
tix could be pretty cheap for this one
tix could be pretty cheap for this one
This team stinks
Losing at home to UCLA is embarrassing.
I really like David Shaw as a coach.
Stanford is basically an injury away from being all Freshman playing a bunch which isn’t their recipe for success. Hopefully this cycle they continue to stockpile a lot of numbers and their depth can grow.
What tha flippin heck is this???
Why would you want the Trees to be better? There is not a more disrespectful team vs ND than Stanford out there. I would love to see Stanford and that smug coach of theirs lose every single game they play.
Surprised we haven't reached out to a few of the corners yet?
Agreed. That was post was a crazy read. We want Stanford to go 0-12 every year. We do not need them to be good, and we benefit strongly from them being poor at recruiting. Think about the value add simply we would get from simply having Adebo on this roster as CB1. There was a period of time where we were losing 2-3 top of the board recruits to Stanford every year.
Last few classes? That's down to 0-1 guys, and they're usually not top of the board players.
What?
Their recruits?
What tha flippin heck is this???
Why would you want the Trees to be better? There is not a more disrespectful team vs ND than Stanford out there. I would love to see Stanford and that smug coach of theirs lose every single game they play.
Ayden Hector
Brandon Jones
Omari Porter
With the transfer portal becoming a new favorite for players, Stanford cannot supplement their roster with transfers and they’ve been losing an above-their-norm amount of players to transfers, medical, and some even quitting football entirely.
Do they take many transfers, historically? Didn’t realize that. I’d think their outbound transfer situation would be similar to ours, maybe even losing fewer players b/c they’re even choosier w/who they recruit and tend to get kids who value the academics (which may lead some to retire early, of course, as we do). Either way I can see how roster management is a challenge. And their Manball approach does require bodies.
I may be in the minority here but - except for when playing or recruiting against ND - I always root for Stanford. Agree Shaw is a prick but they are serious about balancing academics and football success and are (were?) another program we can point to when people say Notre Dame should sell out and be more like the football factories. Big picture I think a strong Stanford is good for college football the way Notre Dame tries to do it.
Do they take many transfers, historically? Didn’t realize that. I’d think their outbound transfer situation would be similar to ours, maybe even losing fewer players b/c they’re even choosier w/who they recruit and tend to get kids who value the academics (which may lead some to retire early, of course, as we do). Either way I can see how roster management is a challenge. And their Manball approach does require bodies.
I may be in the minority here but - except for when playing or recruiting against ND - I always root for Stanford. Agree Shaw is a prick but they are serious about balancing academics and football success and are (were?) another program we can point to when people say Notre Dame should sell out and be more like the football factories. Big picture I think a strong Stanford is good for college football the way Notre Dame tries to do it.
BURN THE FARM!They refer to us as "Northern Indiana Parochial School" even though we're the most national school in the country whose name doesn't include the word "academy." They act like ND isn't close academically even though our ACT scores are actually marginally higher than theirs. They think Catholicism is a joke. They think the Midwest is for backwards farmers.
I'm sick of the coastal arrogance. Let Stanford (football) fall into the ocean.
I get the concept of them balancing academics with football, but that puts them in direct competition with us for those recruits who are looking for that balance.
I'd rather us be good and they suck, so we can nab the Solomon Thomas', the Foster Sarell's, the Paulson Adebo's, etc.
For the greater good of ND football.
Big picture I think having a peer school among the sport’s powers may be worth one or two recruits a year.
I couldn't disagree more. It was like that for years, and it didn't help ND at all.
There will always be recruits who value the academics provided, and it only helps ND if they are the superior choice from a football perspective.
Stanford has quite a few things working in their favor over ND in the classroom, so it doesn't bode well for us if they are on even footing or close to it.
It's that 1-2 recruits a year that are keeping ND from hitting the next tier of program. Picture this defense right now with Adebo, or picture the 2015 team with a defensive line of Sheldon Day, Romeo Okwara, Isaac Rochell and Solomon Thomas. I don't think even BVG could f*ck that up.
It's not that ND is missing out on guys like Josh Pakola, but it's the higher tier guys like Adebo, Thomas and Sarell that are holding ND back.
I root for ND to beat Stanford 70-0 every year. Don’t get that mixed up. However, I generally like the better academic schools in the country and I hope kids and recruits continue to fill the rosters of those schools. Duke, Stanford, Vanderbilt and Northwestern are schools that go about it the right way and I respect what they do and how they do it. You could say as a private school they don’t do what UNC, Michigan and UF do to get their dumb kids in, but they could’ve chosen the route of a Georgetown basketball or Miami football program where a private school sets up entire curriculums designed to let academically challenged kids leave with a BS degree. I respect those schools for going about it the right way.
Second, David Shaw is a good football coach. It’s just silly to think he’s a bad coach or anything but that. Jim Harbaugh has had 1 10 win season at Stanford while David Shaw has had 5. Stanford has been to 30 bowl games ever and Shaw went to 8 of them. He also has won more games than any other coach at Stanford. On top of that, Shaw has rigorous academic restrictions that are worse than ND’s. He has tons of off the field responsibilities that go way beyond most Power 5 coaches and only a few schools match that level of alumni/booster commitment off the field (ND might be one of them). If you think David Shaw is a bad dude, don’t like him personally, or think he’s arrogant then that’s fine cause I don’t know the dude at all but from a football coaching standpoint and running a program, David Shaw is a really good one.
So while I don’t watch Stanford football games and I hope ND doesn’t lose a single recruit to Stanford ever again, I do hope they do well and I think they will continue to do so.
I couldn't disagree more. It was like that for years, and it didn't help ND at all.
There will always be recruits who value the academics provided, and it only helps ND if they are the superior choice from a football perspective.
Stanford has quite a few things working in their favor over ND in the classroom, so it doesn't bode well for us if they are on even footing or close to it.
It's that 1-2 recruits a year that are keeping ND from hitting the next tier of program. Picture this defense right now with Adebo, or picture the 2015 team with a defensive line of Sheldon Day, Romeo Okwara, Isaac Rochell and Solomon Thomas. I don't think even BVG could f*ck that up.
It's not that ND is missing out on guys like Josh Pakola, but it's the higher tier guys like Adebo, Thomas and Sarell that are holding ND back.
Surprised we haven't reached out to a few of the corners yet?