notredomer23
Staph Member
- Messages
- 17,639
- Reaction score
- 17,571
Line opens at ND-8
Ummm no. Committee will see we beat scUM head-to-head.
Talking in general, and for the potential scenario at the end of the year if ND does drop one, and scUM wins out. In that case, Ummm there sure could be a debate.
Committee takes into account head-to-head wins as a greater quality factor.
Clearly states as such.
How are the teams that go to the playoff determined?
The four teams that go to the College Football Playoff are determined by the College Football Playoff Selection Committee. The selection committee chooses the four teams for the playoff based on strength of schedule, head-to-head results against common opponents, championships won and other factors.
Are we really concerned with a team who only beat Rutgers by 3 and put 18 on them or beat Nebraska by 3?
Are we really concerned with a team who only beat Rutgers by 3 and put 18 on them or beat Nebraska by 3?
? where
the only thing i can find on the committee website is
https://collegefootballplayoff.com/sports/2016/10/11/_131504729625539914.aspx
I have heard them say that they prioritize current performance and trends, and where a team is today.
I guess that can be interpreted in a few ways.
I read that as head-to-head comparison.
But touché. That is indeed what I was thinking of for certain and that’s the only verbiage I can find also.
Are we really concerned with a team who only beat Rutgers by 3 and put 18 on them or beat Nebraska by 3?
Not overly concerned, but it's on the road, they beat us last time, they did win 10 last season, beat MSU on the road, and just clobbered Wiscy. It's fair to say they are improving. It's also fair to say that the team/coach underestimated NW in the not so distant past. We should however beat them by 20
If we were at home, I'd feel it was a trap game, but we lock it in on the road. They beat us the last time, but IIRC we had a lot of injuries to starters at that time. This won't be an easy out, but they don't have the troops to match.
With the close proximity to SB and Chicago having a lot of Irish fans, I wonder what the stands will look like?
If we were at home, I'd feel it was a trap game, but we lock it in on the road. They beat us the last time, but IIRC we had a lot of injuries to starters at that time. This won't be an easy out, but they don't have the troops to match.
With the close proximity to SB and Chicago having a lot of Irish fans, I wonder what the stands will look like?
Am I reading that right, Capacity is only 47,130 ????
It will be interesting to see which NW team shows up; the team that just shellacked a (VERY overrated) Wisconsin team by 14 (should have been worse) and took scUM to the brink, or the team who beat Rutgers and Nebraska by a total of 6 points.
I think the fact that this is a night game actually helps the cause. Knowing that it's in prime time and that the crowd will have a little extra juice makes this game appear bigger for the players IMO. If it's a noon kick, I'm a littler worried about our focus level. The guys already handled Lane Stadium, so this should be easier to handle under the lights.
I hope we jump on them early, and don't give NW the type of game they like to play, which is scrappy and ugly, low scoring affairs.
Will be interesting to see what Drue's status is this week. His presence will obviously be hard to replace.
It's Northwestern, man.
Northwestern's head coach is a little known Armenian with an impossible to spell last name.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Are we really concerned with a team who only beat Rutgers by 3 and put 18 on them or beat Nebraska by 3?
Didn't realize NW recovered 3 fumbles in Wisconsin territory. As long as we avoid dumb luck like that, I think we will be fine.
It’s the trappiest trap game of all time. I’m soooo glad they just handled Wisconsin, because at least that removes the “overlook” angle.
But after cross country travel, after Navy (body blow theory), and against a team that will be UP because every football player there would rather be at ND.
What was Bilal down for? Did anyone comment on that injury?
What was Bilal down for? Did anyone comment on that injury?
Blindside block that knocked the wind out of him.
That’s right! That was the play that Neueisel said is “legal” but falls under the targeting definition of hitting a defenseless player so he didn’t understand how that is still allowable when they claim to be concerned w/ player safety.