ND Coaching Changes 2016

Sherm Sticky

The Prophet
Messages
19,321
Reaction score
1,638
Sherm your first two sentences point out it recruiting is a University problem because the last four coaches had no success. Then you kind of rip those 4 coaches recruiting prowess.

So which is it the coaches or UND?



Other coaches have recruited well and coached well. ND had a location/education disadvantage competing with the football factories then too.



Davie had deep ties to Texas schools from his A&M days and used it recruiting for Holtz and himself. Davie also took to ND into FL and the southlands. By '97 half the roster was from south of the Mason Dixon Line. I wrote an article for the Irish Recruiting Journal on the shift in ND's recruiting base. Davie also made ND brought ND camp's up to major college standards. This had the added benefit of exposing recruits to the ND environment including academics. Regardless of his recruiting abilities, his assistants left much to be desired on the recruiting trail and on the field, Colletto, Rodgers, et al. And after Holtz's confrontations with ND Admissions, with and without Cerrato, Davie made no waves to Admissions. Offers weren't official until Admission gave their Nihil Obstat. Dave deferred. Where Holtz/Cerrato had scraped, finessed, bamboozled, or 11th hour time played Admissions, Davie rolled over understanding Malloy and croonies were backing Admissions to the hilt. Keep in mind that in those days ND required 16 core course hours while the NCAA only required 12. Most kids didn't take the courses ND required. And were told if they wanted to come to ND they had to load up their Senior year with tough courses at the same time improving GPAs. Highly touted WR David Terrell committed to ND but Admissions wanted Terrell to retake a course and improve the grade Terriell flipped to Michigan and became a star. Davie once again proved that ND is no place for OJT, on or off the field.



Willingham had success at Stanford but his lack of recruiting interest at ND was probably the worst in ND history. He did get some questionable recruits in, one had a 800 SAT, excelled on the field and graduated on time. Willingham truly ran the program into the ground, leaving his successor with huge wholes in the OLine and other places. After ruining ND, Willingham went to UW and ruined that program.



Weis never should have been hired. See the OJT comment above. Nobly Weis stayed the course with his then current employers through the Super Bowl. Unfamiliar with recruiting egos he withdrew an offer to a recruit who was upset because Weis couldn't make a home visit because of time conflicts with New England. Foolishly UND let the Patriots come before the Irish. Weis's NFL demeanor did work with a lot of recruits and players. He also made gaffs like Davie did hiring assistants (and we can add Kelly and Willingham to that list). Had Cutcliffe not had a heart attack requiring his withdrawal as a coach things might have been better for Weis but he still made fundamental management and coaching mistakes. Without JUCO's to plug into Willingham's lack of OL recruitment, Weis had to swing at the fences for the top OLs, the one he got was forced to start as a freshman and didn't receive the weight room development nor technique that a redshirt year would have provided. He never reached the expectations set for him. Weis did make a number of inroads with the ND Administration among them as an alumni he understood ND's academic emphasis. Where Holtz had fought Rooney and Admissions, and Davie and Willingham had rolled over in deference, Weis approached Saracino (Rooney's successor) to get an understanding of what ND Admissions looked for in a recruit's transcript, core courses, and character. Weis in turn educated his assistants in Admissions way and instructed them to seek out underclassman and instill in them, their coaches, etc what the recruit needed to do as a sophomore, junior, and first semester senior to enable Admissions to give their OK. No need to rehash Schematic Advantage nor Weis's lack of success in subsequent college coaching gigs.



Kelly did well coaching at several places with the lower rated players those schools and their opponents usually got. Two of the big questions with him when he came to ND was could he recruit nationally and could he compete on the field with the big dawg schools and coaches. I believe he's done better than his 3 predecessors but still made the similar management errors in hiring staff. Where Weis hired people he had never worked with Kelly insisted on bringing his small fish staff from his small fish previous employer. Assistant who like Weis's were a mixed bag in recruiting. It requires all the staff not just some of them. Kelly also exhibited an arrogance similar to Weis in doing the same thing over and over despite it not working time after time. "Get used to it." Kelly did get a training table at ND something Malloy and his predecessors had fought for against generations of ND coaches.



Three of these coaches never should have been hired. The fourth was on the cusp of the winning percentage of the great ND coaches ... till the Frozen Five, ND's retroactive ineligibility, the last drive with MJ and a gun ... none of which were the coaching staff's responsiblity. ND has Du lac, Res Life, and places accountability in the student. But expect the coaching staff to win with reduced numbers and replace them with freshman ... and still win.



Who hired these coaches? Not the location in Indiana. Not the weather, diversity, parietals, small dorms, tough academic requirements and lack of cake courses an degrees. The UND Adminstration is the common denominator.



UND has a similar history for more than 80 years. Rockne's death was sad, yet a relief to the ND Administration. He ran the show and they resented that in spades. They didn't replace him with another successful coach. They threw in a former player with coaching experience but chopped the number of scholarships. When Leahy won 4 National Championship working inhuman hours and his health was compromised he asked for a year's leave of absence to recover. The new ND president didn't care for football once again being bigger than the University. So the president who would be know for his championing civil rights, promoted the Freshman Coach to Head Coach. He was an All-American RB for ND so that obviously qualified him to win at the Winnningest Program in major college football. It had a winning percentage of over .800 in the 50's.



Like Hunk Anderson, Terry Brennan was a good man, was put in over his head, while at the same time ND once again cut scholarships while opponents were adding them. When Brennan didn't hit expectations another former player was brought in and handcuffed. Kuharich had talent but not enough bodies.



Ara initially said no to Father Hesburgh. A couple of days after the interview, Hesburgh who had sacked Leaky, hired Brennan and Kuharich, made the "adjustments" Ara said were needed for the program to succeed. They continued with Devine but after he retired once again UND decided that a proven college head coach wasn't necessary. A great HS coach would suffice. Faust and his assistants recruited well but that success wasn't matched on the field. Once again it was shown that ND is not the place for OJT.



This brings us to Davie, Willingham, Weis, and Kelly and a UND Adminsitration that hasn't learned that those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it. Over and over again.



For ND to be successful with the big dogs, ND needs a great coach and great recruiting classes year after year. Without the JUCO plugin factor to replace the career ending injuries, academic and student life casualties, ND has to replace 20 year olds with 17 and 18 year olds. ND had to succeed every year in recruiting and every couple of years when hiring coaching staffs.



Wow. Great write up! Reps!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Sherm Sticky

The Prophet
Messages
19,321
Reaction score
1,638
This post is the word! I am glad to have been able to read it.



That is why I believe there are real plans in the works to untangle the Football operations from the University administration. The future model will be more of a self-funded, independent business operation, operating distinctly separate under the university's charter.


Man I hope you are correct. That would be great.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Sherm Sticky

The Prophet
Messages
19,321
Reaction score
1,638
Weis was actually great. His problem was everything else that came with being a head coach in college football. He actually had lots of talent on defense, he just didn't know how to develop it and had a bad staff in place.



With regards to Stanford, the majority of their roster is not Cali players and NorCal has pretty mediocre talent concentration. ND has a lot of talent in the Midwest to pull from... it's extremely underrated how much talent there is on a yearly basis from Chicago/Indiana but Notre Dame does a very poor job of recruiting this talent... and was totally MIA in recruiting Ohio/Michigan this cycle. People every year make excuses about why Notre Dame "can't" recruit but an incompetent coach like Weis who simply tried hard showed it can be done. Kelly's problem is that he and his staff basically haven't worked hard for the past 5 years.



I agree and disagree with your assessment of Weis as a recruiter. He is the best recruiter of the group, which I kind of implied before. He definitely worked the hardest at recruiting. And some of his staff, Polian and Alford worked their butts off also.

Where I disagree with you is that Weis brought in good defensive classes with a lot of talent. There were many holes on the defensive line from the lack of success recruiting top 100/200 dl recruits. LB's was a success. CB had some very good high end talent: Walls, Gray, Blanton, McNeil. But that was it, he was never able to get depth at the position. Same with safety: Smith, Motta, Slaughter, Brown, Bruton. But again that was it, no depth.

Now Weis was a stud recruiter at WR, RB, QB and TE. But, offensive line left a lot to be desired. He got his five star in Sam Young. His four stars in Robinson, wenger, Devers. But again lacked the depth needed. Depth would have added more competition and would have gotten the best 5 on the field with urgency of Max effort not to lose their spot. Now the depth Kelly had put together on the OL is what Weis could not do.

Obviously this is just my 2 cents.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Sherm Sticky

The Prophet
Messages
19,321
Reaction score
1,638
ISD has a great article by Nick Dubose. Analyze This. I don't mean to shortchange it by talking about just one slice it makes, but read it.

It points out Alabama, Clemson, and Ohio States recent success as how well these staffs have used non coaching assistants or analysts.

Bama has 16 very highly qualified assistants that to statistical analysis at one time, and break down high school tape to scout recruits at another. Read more about the rest of what they do.

Clemson has a dozen, OSU ten, but ND has 7 and three or four are intern positions, so they don't even have the experience to do what the other three schools have their analysts do!

You can talk about standards, having assistants as recruiting superstars, etc. But as I am learning, to win at college football today, you need to have a large staff, (larger than ND's), filled with very capable, well trained individuals, (also above ND's standards).

Wouldn't it be interesting if ND built the behind the scenes staff, right, and started winning and began a climb back to the big-time?



Bogs you are in fire! Amen brother...Amen. Reps.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Sherm Sticky

The Prophet
Messages
19,321
Reaction score
1,638
Yes, Michigan got to a point similar to where we are now under Kelly and looked down the road at OSU and said "we need to do everything in our power to compete with that."



They went out and spent ungodly amounts on Harbaugh, and then gave him blank checks for support staff. They're letting him do literally anything he wants and he thinks will help win.



Clemson, similarly, saw the rise of the SEC and Oregon and said "only way we win is to spend money"... they got Morris and Venables for more $$ than anyone was paying at the time. Their facilities are going to be bonkers once complete. That's what winners do.



The fact that ND is spending hundreds of millions to add classrooms to a football stadium tells you the priorities aren't even close to being what they should be to compete with the elite. The money spent on Elko tells me they're sort of waking up though and just trying to make sure the next coach is the best one they can possibly get instead of settling for an available option like Rhule this past cycle.



Hey Notre Dame has now or soon will have a training table, field turf and get this some big monitor/TV they call a Jumbotron....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
I believe there are real plans in the works to untangle the Football operations from the University administration. The future model will be more of a self-funded, independent business operation, operating distinctly separate under the university's charter.

I'm not sure I can see this happening. The football program operates at such a profit now, with those profits going back into not just the Athletic Dept., but the University as well. I just can't see them operating it as an independent operation and giving up that extra revenue for the other athletic and University programs.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
I'm not sure I can see this happening. The football program operates at such a profit now, with those profits going back into not just the Athletic Dept., but the University as well. I just can't see them operating it as an independent operation and giving up that extra revenue for the other athletic and University programs.

I agree with everything you say. You are correct, but continue the thought, so to speak.

What kind of hit do you think ND took this season. Do you think there isn't a lot of information being gathered on all of that?

So lets extrapolate for a minuted. If the program takes a step back in prominence, and winning, what happens to the revenue they produce?

And if you divide the football program and school in some meaningful way, there are many ways of legitimately keeping the revenue flow streaming to the university, while limiting the university's liabilities, and schizophrenic involvement in the program's direction.

That all comes under a conversation of how much higher revenue could have been.

Think about it. The conversation, and resultant action, only pivot off the academicians need to control the athletic department. There is no good case for not having a tighter business model.
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
I agree with everything you say. You are correct, but continue the thought, so to speak.

What kind of hit do you think ND took this season. Do you think there isn't a lot of information being gathered on all of that?

So lets extrapolate for a minuted. If the program takes a step back in prominence, and winning, what happens to the revenue they produce?

And if you divide the football program and school in some meaningful way, there are many ways of legitimately keeping the revenue flow streaming to the university, while limiting the university's liabilities, and schizophrenic involvement in the program's direction.

That all comes under a conversation of how much higher revenue could have been.

Think about it. The conversation, and resultant action, only pivot off the academicians need to control the athletic department. There is no good case for not having a tighter business model.

I'm curious...

What would a more independent structure look like? What would change in your vision?
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
I agree with everything you say. You are correct, but continue the thought, so to speak.

What kind of hit do you think ND took this season. Do you think there isn't a lot of information being gathered on all of that?

So lets extrapolate for a minuted. If the program takes a step back in prominence, and winning, what happens to the revenue they produce?

And if you divide the football program and school in some meaningful way, there are many ways of legitimately keeping the revenue flow streaming to the university, while limiting the university's liabilities, and schizophrenic involvement in the program's direction.

That all comes under a conversation of how much higher revenue could have been.

Think about it. The conversation, and resultant action, only pivot off the academicians need to control the athletic department. There is no good case for not having a tighter business model.

It would also necessarily mean the University losing some measure of control over the football team. If you want to limit liability, then you have to let it operate independently. If you let it operate independently, then you have to give up the ability to keep it from growing larger than the University. And that will never happen!
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
I'm curious...

What would a more independent structure look like? What would change in your vision?

I am not entirely sure. I don't get all the detail, and I am not sure I would post it if I did.

But if I were spitballin', I would go back to a bevy of statements made by the upper tiers at ND. That they see college sport (football particularly) becoming more of a Junior NFL than turning things back. I think even a couple statements (particularly when taking about the 'players union.') were made that ND was ready to adapt to that.

So I would guess that UND would retain ownership of facilities, being compensated for their use by the program, the program would be responsible for its own profit and loss, which would include rents, leases, and reimbursements. All policy and procedure would be agreed upon by multi-year contracts, negotiated in advance. Athletics would seperate all finances, including starting a parallel athletic endowment.

Would the athletics claim non-profit status? I don't know. Or would the set up endowment funds as a non-profit, encouraging charitable contributions? I would have no idea!

But a situation where you had two separate entities, each with their own autonomous leadership, charged with their own best interest, having tight binding contract to share what resources that make sense legally, and from a business standpoint, is what it is coming. Do students get school credit as trainers, and therefore work in a student-assistant capacity. This is way beyond me.

The only thing I can see is the discipline of correctly drill down past the emotion of the situation, and determine who profits whom. That's the rub, isn't it?
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
It would also necessarily mean the University losing some measure of control over the football team. If you want to limit liability, then you have to let it operate independently. If you let it operate independently, then you have to give up the ability to keep it from growing larger than the University. And that will never happen!

I agree that that is, and or has been the mentality. But with the right contracts negotiated and in place, I am not sure growth of the 'football team' would be the kind of problem it has and still is seen by many. I just don't know.

I do know that all the reasons for shutting down football in the past have proven out to be unnecessary, and have hurt the school in other ways.

And I do believe unchaining these pieces would be to everyone's best interest.

Here is the bottom line on that. Beyond the history, (as in what would ND's football record be if at least five times in or just before my lifetime attempts weren't made to diminish or curtail the football program?

From a business standpoint, the best model when you have two very large, often competing divisions within the same entity, is to free them to grow independently. Isn't it?
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
It would also necessarily mean the University losing some measure of control over the football team. If you want to limit liability, then you have to let it operate independently. If you let it operate independently, then you have to give up the ability to keep it from growing larger than the University. And that will never happen!

Everyone speaks of the university's fear of the football program "getting bigger" than the university. I have to admit I don't understand what it means. How can a part of the university become bigger than the university itself? Doesn't growth of the football program also indicate growth of the university as a whole, not only in revenue but in publicity and branding opportunities? What does the administration fear will happen if the football team is good?
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Everyone speaks of the university's fear of the football program "getting bigger" than the university. I have to admit I don't understand what it means. How can a part of the university become bigger than the university itself? Doesn't growth of the football program also indicate growth of the university as a whole, not only in revenue but in publicity and branding opportunities? What does the administration fear will happen if the football team is good?

From reading your post, to understand that you would radically have to change your mid-set. Think more like it is us versus them! We can't both win. Think octagon, cage matches, Inquisition, Cold War, and all of that.

Don't use intelligence, logic, or general good will. That doesn't count.

Moose is right, that was, (and maybe still is) the mentality of the administration.
 

NDShark

Well-known member
Messages
1,343
Reaction score
563
Everyone speaks of the university's fear of the football program "getting bigger" than the university. I have to admit I don't understand what it means. How can a part of the university become bigger than the university itself? Doesn't growth of the football program also indicate growth of the university as a whole, not only in revenue but in publicity and branding opportunities? What does the administration fear will happen if the football team is good?

Oversimplifying, but, I'm assuming this means all of the money the football team makes, the football team keeps rather than the current model of spreading the wealth.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Oversimplifying, but, I'm assuming this means all of the money the football team makes, the football team keeps rather than the current model of spreading the wealth.

Definitely not.

It is about how to make more, without the tail swallowing up the whole dog.
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
I am not entirely sure. I don't get all the detail, and I am not sure I would post it if I did.

But if I were spitballin', I would go back to a bevy of statements made by the upper tiers at ND. That they see college sport (football particularly) becoming more of a Junior NFL than turning things back. I think even a couple statements (particularly when taking about the 'players union.') were made that ND was ready to adapt to that.

So I would guess that UND would retain ownership of facilities, being compensated for their use by the program, the program would be responsible for its own profit and loss, which would include rents, leases, and reimbursements. All policy and procedure would be agreed upon by multi-year contracts, negotiated in advance. Athletics would seperate all finances, including starting a parallel athletic endowment.

Would the athletics claim non-profit status? I don't know. Or would the set up endowment funds as a non-profit, encouraging charitable contributions? I would have no idea!

But a situation where you had two separate entities, each with their own autonomous leadership, charged with their own best interest, having tight binding contract to share what resources that make sense legally, and from a business standpoint, is what it is coming. Do students get school credit as trainers, and therefore work in a student-assistant capacity. This is way beyond me.

The only thing I can see is the discipline of correctly drill down past the emotion of the situation, and determine who profits whom. That's the rub, isn't it?

Just trying to picture how this works...Who hires and fires the AD? Is here a separate board of trustees? I guess once you get that part ironed out, it is possible. In terms of attending the college, and disciplinary action...where does that fit?
 

NDShark

Well-known member
Messages
1,343
Reaction score
563
From reading your post, to understand that you would radically have to change your mid-set. Think more like it is us versus them! We can't both win. Think octagon, cage matches, Inquisition, Cold War, and all of that.

Don't use intelligence, logic, or general good will. That doesn't count.

Moose is right, that was, (and maybe still is) the mentality of the administration.

So, pride?
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Just trying to picture how this works...Who hires and fires the AD? Is here a separate board of trustees? I guess once you get that part ironed out, it is possible. In terms of attending the college, and disciplinary action...where does that fit?

I won't talk about the management structure.

But the other details would be easily worked out. The college disciplines for college related issues, and has withholding of scholarship, or student enrollment as control. The athletic entity is able to levy its own discipline, as it currently, occasionally does. It all splits out kind of nicely.
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
From reading your post, to understand that you would radically have to change your mid-set. Think more like it is us versus them! We can't both win. Think octagon, cage matches, Inquisition, Cold War, and all of that.

Don't use intelligence, logic, or general good will. That doesn't count.

Moose is right, that was, (and maybe still is) the mentality of the administration.

I see. I didn't realize it was essentially an emotional position rather than a logical one. It is like the administration thinks they are in a divorce battle with the football program, but in reality the football program isn't the spouse but the child.

With all of the brilliant minds around the university, I can't believe that no one has sold the administration on exploiting the football program for the good of the university. Instead they treat this cash cow like an albatross.
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
I won't talk about the management structure.

But the other details would be easily worked out. The college disciplines for college related issues, and has withholding of scholarship, or student enrollment as control. The athletic entity is able to levy its own discipline, as it currently, occasionally does. It all splits out kind of nicely.

ok...

just thinking its pretty hard to have true separation if you don't have a separate board...just my assumption I guess.
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,012
Reaction score
5,055
If the higher ups at ND want to bring the football program into the modern era, they gotta pony up for more analysts. They should start with this favorite son.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Packers?src=hash">#Packers</a> assoc. HC for offense Tom Clements will move on from the organization, coach Mike McCarthy said. OC Edgar Bennett in the spotlight</p>— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/824662477095010306">January 26, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,605
Reaction score
20,083
I see. I didn't realize it was essentially an emotional position rather than a logical one. It is like the administration thinks they are in a divorce battle with the football program, but in reality the football program isn't the spouse but the child.

With all of the brilliant minds around the university, I can't believe that no one has sold the administration on exploiting the football program for the good of the university. Instead they treat this cash cow like an albatross.

This goes back to those on the academic side who view universities in their purest sense. That of being a place to be educated. They don't care about athletics, even if it brings in revenue to improve classrooms. Some don't even think athletics should be part of a school. This is not isolated to ND though. There are plenty of teachers and administrators at other schools who feel this way and like to push their opinion.
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
If the higher ups at ND want to bring the football program into the modern era, they gotta pony up for more analysts. They should start with this favorite son.

His and BK's schemes aren't compatible. It'd be like John Chaney and Bobby Knight being co-defensive coordinators.

Plus if BK sticks around, BDub's the perfect fit for him as is PJ coming behind him.
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,012
Reaction score
5,055
His and BK's schemes aren't compatible. It'd be like John Chaney and Bobby Knight being co-defensive coordinators.

Plus if BK sticks around, BDub's the perfect fit for him as is PJ coming behind him.

I'm not saying implement the Packers scheme, I'm saying get him in a room to break down film with other analysts to find the weak spots in opponent's defenses or offenses. Bogs posted an article by ISD just yesterday explaining how big of a role the analysts play for Clemson, Meatchicken, Bama, etc. That's what ND needs to be doing.
 

PANDFAN

Look Down
Messages
16,770
Reaction score
2,278
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Don't sleep on us.<br><br>We're building something ELITE.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/tictoc?src=hash">#tictoc</a> <a href="https://t.co/thXEpyi16g">pic.twitter.com/thXEpyi16g</a></p>— Brian Kelly (@CoachBrianKelly) <a href="https://twitter.com/CoachBrianKelly/status/824673226538291201">January 26, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Top