IrishinTN
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,894
- Reaction score
- 340
There is probable cause to search the houses when a terrorist is on the loose. They just couldn't charge anyone for anything that they find
If a) consent was freely given; and b) they see something criminal "in plain view," I'm pretty sure that the one giving consent could be prosecuted.
Even if there was no consent but they were in "hot pursuit" of someone and ran through someone's apartment, you could still get that person for any illegalities.
Someone correct if I'm wrong.
They don't really have probable cause to search just any house even with a suspect on the run. They could certainly ask for permission to search a house, but unless I just heard incorrectly they might not have been "searching" every house but rather just going door to door making sure everything is ok. The only way that they could get in without a warrant or permission is if there was some kind of exigent circumstance, such as hot pursuit or if there was a reasonable belief that some kind of harm would occur if they didn't enter the dwelling.
Also, as far as not being able to charge anyone for anything they could find, if any illicit activity is in plain sight and the cops entered the home legally, they could certainly be charged.
Interesting. Thanks for the explanations. I understand having to operate by our rights for sure and I also understand the public good sometimes overriding it. That is obviously a very difficult legal question and precedence. We don't get this very often, thank God.
The other thing is if they knock on someone's door but they say no because this whacko tells them to and he is wearing a suicide vest.