The best athletes are in many cases located near SEC schools. Not exactly where the dome is.
In addition, we as a University put a premium on graduating student athletes, we also put a premium on honoring our scholarship commitment for four years regardless of injury or lack of development.
Scott Rabalais@ScottRabalais
Miles on Kiel: To step into our stadium ... takes a different breed of cat. I wish Gunner all the best and I mean that very honestly. #LSU
Scott Rabalais@ScottRabalais
Miles on Kiel: To step into our stadium ... takes a different breed of cat. I wish Gunner all the best and I mean that very honestly. #LSU
He wants cats with chest]
I'm tired of hearing about this huge talent gap. Its just another excuse for poor management.
Since 2006 if you average our recuiting class we are at 11.8, LSU is at 7.7. "per rivals" So in that time we have averaged a recruit class very close to LSU's. Our problem isnt getting recruits, its developing talents, and using talent properly. If you are getting top 20 talent, and cant finish in the top 25, there is a problem in the system.
Just a side note Miles can kiss my ***, LSU has had a nice little run, but they have 3 NC's and had a 45 year title drought that just ended a few years back.
I'm tired of hearing about this huge talent gap. Its just another excuse for poor management.
Since 2006 if you average our recuiting class we are at 11.8, LSU is at 7.7. "per rivals" So in that time we have averaged a recruit class very close to LSU's. Our problem isnt getting recruits, its developing talents, and using talent properly. If you are getting top 20 talent, and cant finish in the top 25, there is a problem in the system.
Just a side note Miles can kiss my ***, LSU has had a nice little run, but they have 3 NC's and had a 45 year title drought that just ended a few years back.
As Phork alluded to, Notre Dame does not have the luxury of oversigning our classes. If a 4/5 star kid doesn't work out, he still stays for his entire college career (see Deion Walker and Tyler Stockton). In the SEC, they push them off of their team and sign another class. Look at how big each of their classes are every year. I'm not a genius, but last time I checked 24+24+26+25 does not equal 85 scholarships. Not to mention the "unranked" Juco gangsters they can add/drop at will. Our coaching staff has a much more difficult job. Notre Dame needs top ten classes every year, and have the majority of them turn out, just to have close to comparable talent level to SEC schools.
I've said before, and i'll say it again, every school should have to offer 4 year scholarships. Not what essentially amounts to a year by year scholarship.
My point wasn't just about recruiting. I understand LSU and schools like them have advantages, but our problem is deeper then talent, we have to change the football culture at ND. Its just like a company, if you hire a CEO who believes in the company but everyone else sits around making excuses for the failure, then that CEO will fail. Notre Dame may not be getting SEC talent, but we have talent, top 25 talent, yet we haven't played at Top 25 level since Charles 2nd year. Something is broken.
I'm tired of hearing about this huge talent gap. Its just another excuse for poor management.
Since 2006 if you average our recuiting class we are at 11.8, LSU is at 7.7. "per rivals" So in that time we have averaged a recruit class very close to LSU's.
While I agree with this premise and feel that this has been Kelly's biggest challenge with Notre Dame, how is your first point not about recruiting?
Your original point stated that there hasn't been this "talent gap" that people talk about. I am telling you that there certainly has been one. The depth desparancy has been noticeable and will always be a concern for our team as long as other teams are oversigning. Until that practice stops, we have to hit on the majority of our top recruits. It is a lot harder for Notre Dame to overcome a blue chip recruit flopping than it is for an SEC team.
Well I agree there is a talent gap. My arguement was that although there is a gap, Its not as huge as some like to think. Some guys like to act like we havent been successful because of recruiting. Like we have been bringing in the 35th class. Where in real life we have had top 15 talent, but haven't finished in the top 15 in years. Which means our problems the last 20 years weren't just talent, it was much deeper. Although I do believe we are heading back in the right direction, and I believe when we can start winning 9+ games a season you'll see our recruiting ranking get much better.
As for the SEC, they will always have an advantage, I mean you can play football at Georgia with an 800 on the SAT. An 800 wont even get you on the ND campus. The good news is a Smart, Well Coached, Disciplined team, can compete with a more talented team, Just watch Boise St vs Uga, Boise St vs Oregon, or Boise St vs Oklahoma.
I don't think you totally understand the talent gap. While we have our token 5 star kids, they have them everywhere. Their 2 deep is 4 star, 3 deep is 4 star...
remember also that when LSU has a key transfer or injury/lack of depth they can just jump on the nearest capable JUCO... that can make a huge difference over four years in many ways.
I don't think you totally understand the talent gap. While we have our token 5 star kids, they have them everywhere. Their 2 deep is 4 star, 3 deep is 4 star...
Bam, this all the way. If they have a poor developmental cycle at a position as in many kids don't pan out, or a rash of injuries, they can plug and play a JUCO transfer. They have developed physically and are seasoned in the college game. It's a huuuuuuuge advantage that can't be stated enough. If we get injuries or fall short or don't develop properly, we're ****ed. Wouldn't it be great to go get some corners to plug and play in this team, or some seasoned wide outs? LSU can plug the problems we have now, we can't.
Yep, it isn't close and with what happened to us last year in recruiting it really hurts us more than any other school. LSU can go grab someone from JC(If they have down year in recruiting) to plug holes that they may have.
Les is a jack off but they do have superior talent...
YES. Just look at our quality dpeth in the secondary... JUCOs would make a huge difference... anyway
I do understand, but the reason they have their 5 star guys is because they win football games! LSU wasnt grabbing up 5 star guys until Nick Saban changed that program, into a winning program. They went 45 years without a title, the same thing USC did under Pete Carroll. USC was "done",they went like 23 years without a title, I know USC fans who were saying the same things guys on this board are saying. Its all excuses, If we win, we will get more talent.
And since 2006 we have had 11token 5 star recruits while LSU has had 14. We have done a poor job developing players, since the Davie era.