Mike Elko - Defensive Coordinator

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
you can do both at the same time.

Sure, you can. But ND has always placed the emphasis on tradition and class, not the latest fad. It's not the University's way, to dump a productive long time employee for the sake of "hip". Their style is more to let the employee serve out their time, then look to get more "modern" when replacing them.
 

calvegas04

Well-known member
Messages
11,903
Reaction score
8,490
Currently 737 views from the Watch ND YouTube page. Probably never goes much over 1,000.

I'd bet zero uncommitted recruits watched.

sure we would have a bigger audience if they dint have a stiff up there talking with no energy
 

dublinirish

Everestt Gholstonson
Messages
27,335
Reaction score
13,096
Sure, you can. But ND has always placed the emphasis on tradition and class, not the latest fad. It's not the University's way, to dump a productive long time employee for the sake of "hip". Their style is more to let the employee serve out their time, then look to get more "modern" when replacing them.

shamrock series? jumbotrons? field turf?
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181

PANDFAN

Look Down
Messages
16,770
Reaction score
2,278
2. How to measure a recruiter
When Mike Elko got hired as defensive coordinator at Notre Dame, the immediate question for every fan was "can he recruit?" Fans like great coaches but they love great recruiters.

When I was asked my thoughts on Elko's recruiting prowess, it was a hard question to answer. You can't judge it by his national recruiter ranking on 247Sports or by the number of prospects associated to his name. The guy came from Wake Forest, Bowling Green and an assortment of FCS schools before that. He's not used to recruiting five-stars. But that doesn't mean he can't do it.

My answer to those questions was typically something to the effect of "he has a reputation as a hard-worker and he takes recruiting seriously." At a place like Notre Dame, that's really all you need. But that doesn't mean they are common traits.

Since Elko has arrived, Notre Dame has stolen a four-star safety 2017 commit out of California late in the process (Jordan Genmark-Heath) as part of a furious signing day close. That close included flipping a DE from Maryland (Kofi Wardlow), winning on a defensive end out of Hawaii (Myron Tagovailoa-Amosa) and beating Michigan State on one-time Virginia linebacker commit Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah.

Now Notre Dame's 2018 class is ranked 2nd nationally thanks in part to Elko and the staff locking down Derrick Allen out of Georgia, the No. 52 player in the country on Monday.

The emblem on your polo matters in recruiting and we're quickly finding out that Elko in a Notre Dame shirt can do some serious damage nationally.

Column by 247Sports CFB Insider Barton Simmons: Alabama's WRs, Notre Dame's recruiting
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,457
Reaction score
8,537
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">How good's the Mike Elko hire been for <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NotreDame?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NotreDame</a>? Last year ND ranked No. 71 in Red Zone TD% allowed. This year ND is No. 3.</p>— Bruce Feldman (@BruceFeldmanCFB) <a href="https://twitter.com/BruceFeldmanCFB/status/918536017916973056?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 12, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

IrishFanJMercy

New member
Messages
2,485
Reaction score
40
If he is DC in 2015 we may have gone undefeated, in 2016 we would have won a lot more games all our losses minus USC was by 1 score or less could have easily only lost 1 game
 

dwshade

Banned
Messages
3,338
Reaction score
123
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">How good's the Mike Elko hire been for <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NotreDame?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NotreDame</a>? Last year ND ranked No. 71 in Red Zone TD% allowed. This year ND is No. 3.</p>— Bruce Feldman (@BruceFeldmanCFB) <a href="https://twitter.com/BruceFeldmanCFB/status/918536017916973056?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 12, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Wow, what a great stat. And we have been very productive in the RZ on offense.
 

NDRock

Well-known member
Messages
7,489
Reaction score
5,448
Wow, what a great stat. And we have been very productive in the RZ on offense.

Yep. Turnovers, run the ball/stop the run, and RZ efficiency (TD%) are three keys to winning football. We've been good in all three this year.
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,457
Reaction score
8,537
Three stats that pretty much tell you all you need to know.

1. Offensive Redzone TD% = 80.77% ranked 11th
2. Defensive Redzone TD% = 35.00% ranked 3rd
3. Turnover Margin = +1.17/game ranked 13th
 

irishtrain

Well-known member
Messages
2,359
Reaction score
157
After watching the spring game I am shocked and proud of what theses guys are doing-keep stripping and get the ball back--this guy has probably saved a very good coach 's job. Well done and now the tests come-Wake/southern cal/Navy/Stanford/Miami all tough games and oh by the way N C State. Win 4 of those games and its been a ^%$#ava season.
 

dwshade

Banned
Messages
3,338
Reaction score
123
Three stats that pretty much tell you all you need to know.

1. Offensive Redzone TD% = 80.77% ranked 11th
2. Defensive Redzone TD% = 35.00% ranked 3rd
3. Turnover Margin = +1.17/game ranked 13th

And one of our two failures to score points in the RZ was at the end of the UNC game when we took a knee to run out the clock.
 

Valpodoc85

Well-known member
Messages
1,720
Reaction score
466
Elko should get a large bonus check. Optics are a whole lot different than last year
 

GoldenDomer

preferred walk on
Messages
3,160
Reaction score
166
Amazing what happens when you turn good football players loose and just let them play.
 

SouthSideChiDomer

Well-known member
Messages
1,526
Reaction score
614
Something I've been thinking about but haven't seen anyone talking about: how much do you think the improved defense, and more importantly the defensive line, have helped the offensive line become what they are this year. I can only assume that the difference in what they have to go up against every day in practice helps them improve.
 

Veritate Duce Progredi

A man gotta have a code
Messages
9,358
Reaction score
5,352
Last year 12 games:
14 sacks
8 INTs
9 Forced fumbles
29 QB hurries
36 passes broken up

This year in 6 games:
13 sacks
6 INTs
7 Forced fumbles
33 QB hurries
24 passes broken up
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,388
Reaction score
10,249
I admit I'm no scheme guru but the biggest difference to me is just how aggressively we're tackling this year.
Defensive players are attacking the ballcarrier, not waiting to get run over for four yards after contact. And if the first guy doesn't stick him, three or four other tacklers are right behind for the gang tackle. Huge difference from the last few years, when we'd miss tackles or get run over out of tentativeness.
 

JSBusch

Member
Messages
55
Reaction score
2
I admit I'm no scheme guru but the biggest difference to me is just how aggressively we're tackling this year.
Defensive players are attacking the ballcarrier, not waiting to get run over for four yards after contact. And if the first guy doesn't stick him, three or four other tacklers are right behind for the gang tackle. Huge difference from the last few years, when we'd miss tackles or get run over out of tentativeness.

I'd agree with you.. I can't help but think the reason is a simpler scheme allowing guys to play faster without thinking. From experience, when you have 3-4 pre-snap reads it gets in your head and you don't fly because you don't want to be out of position.
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
I admit I'm no scheme guru but the biggest difference to me is just how aggressively we're tackling this year.
Defensive players are attacking the ballcarrier, not waiting to get run over for four yards after contact. And if the first guy doesn't stick him, three or four other tacklers are right behind for the gang tackle. Huge difference from the last few years, when we'd miss tackles or get run over out of tentativeness.

I'd agree with you.. I can't help but think the reason is a simpler scheme allowing guys to play faster without thinking. From experience, when you have 3-4 pre-snap reads it gets in your head and you don't fly because you don't want to be out of position.

I think the reason for improvement is simple. They actually practiced tackling this year. Elko preaches fundamentals like tackling and punching the ball out, and they work on it. That stuff was more or less ignored by BVG.
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,014
Reaction score
5,055
I think the reason for improvement is simple. They actually practiced tackling this year. Elko preaches fundamentals like tackling and punching the ball out, and they work on it. That stuff was more or less ignored by BVG.

It blows my mind that coaches don't teach tackling. A lack of emphasis on proper tackling seems like the easiest way to have a terrible defense
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,620
Reaction score
20,108
I think the reason for improvement is simple. They actually practiced tackling this year. Elko preaches fundamentals like tackling and punching the ball out, and they work on it. That stuff was more or less ignored by BVG.

You can't teach tackling when you have to spend the entire practice teaching a complicated defense only Joe Schmidt could comprehend.
 
Top