If they just want to check the box and then make their hire, there are faster ways to go than waiting for Freeman to have time for an in-person.I don’t think I saw the Rooney Rule mentioned as a possible reason the Bears may want to interview Freeman
They're interviewing Eddie George today and already interviewed Ron Rivera. I think it's going to be either Ben Johnson or McCarthy.I don’t think I saw the Rooney Rule mentioned as a possible reason the Bears may want to interview Freeman
The rules are the rules but it's kind of silly that interviewing a guy who has spent 13 seasons as an NFL head coach qualifies under a rule supposedly intended to give head coaching opportunities to people who haven't had them.They're interviewing Eddie George today and already interviewed Ron Rivera. I think it's going to be either Ben Johnson or McCarthy.
I assume because the owners agreed to it?How has the Rooney Rule not been challenged in the courts yet?
Probably because every white owner and coach is scared to be called racist if they complain about it. If anything, it's offensive to minority coaches who are being interviewed just to satisfy the requirement. In what world is Eddie George a qualified candidate for an NFL head coaching job?I assume because the owners agreed to it?
What would the grounds for a lawsuit be, exactly? The NFL's basically a company whose owners agreed to this as an HR policy. No one's constitutional rights are being deprived. And it obviously hasn't stopped NFL teams from overwhelmingly hiring white coaches.How has the Rooney Rule not been challenged in the courts yet?
In theory, it is supposed to help minority coaches by allowing them access to interviews and networking opportunities they otherwise, theoretically, wouldn't have available to them. They might interview for a gig under the rule, not get it that time, but impress the team so much that they get the job later on, or get plugged into the network, and get offered a different job.Probably because every white owner and coach is scared to be called racist if they complain about it. If anything, it's offensive to minority coaches who are being interviewed just to satisfy the requirement. In what world is Eddie George a qualified candidate for an NFL head coaching job?
I pictured something similar to affirmative action being reversed by the Supreme Court regarding college admissionsWhat would the grounds for a lawsuit be, exactly? The NFL's basically a company whose owners agreed to this as an HR policy. No one's constitutional rights are being deprived. And it obviously hasn't stopped NFL teams from overwhelmingly hiring white coaches.
Edit: Your point that it is more offensive to Black coaches than anything else is right on. The Bears are clearly just going through the motions here. But, again, that's not something you can really sue over.
Maybe it was his demeanor or body language through out the playoffs but he just didn't seem fully bought in. The energy seemed lacking. Idk if it's the current landscape of college coaching getting to him or the pressure at Texas but the vibes are off with him.
Like many ideas, it works much better in theory than in practice. You want guys to get opportunities, you don't want them to just be tokens.Still one of the dumbest rules there is.
A lot of good black coaches they get interviewed because that have to be.
Sounding like the Bears are leaning towards Dennis Allen, former Saints head coach.I would hate if golden went to Chicago instead of cincy
Thanks haven't seen thatSounding like the Bears are leaning towards Dennis Allen, former Saints head coach.
Correct, needs to be better. Lack of effort on the trail has been noticeable. Everyone will then say it's about the money like ND doesn't have anyMarcus is still the guy for this job. But, I hope this game puts to rest any more rationalizations that his recruiting efforts are good enough. We MUST have top 5 classes every year. Period. He has absolutely not stockpiled enough talent. I think he can, though.