Ok i couldn't remember who the AD was then. Thanks
Mike Garrett
Ok i couldn't remember who the AD was then. Thanks
Honestly trying to figure out what's worse- this news or the first 3 minutes of yesterday's game.
Hmm.. U. of Houston tennis coach saying Broncos DC in LA tonite RT @coachPSully Just spotted Jack Del Rio in LAX #USC
Bruce Feldman@BFeldmanCBS
These rumors are going to fly around a lot. Although that's mostly what twitter is.
The first 3 minutes of yesterday's game, No one could see that train coming
Personally, I would put Sark at the head of the list. He has done a great job at Washington. His ties to the program also help. Del Rio... that would be a win for everyone else. Good coordinator... not so good a HC. I think Peterson's ship has sailed... he should have left two years ago. Petrino is too much of a risk with his past issues... the NCAA would be all over USC for that potential hire. Strong would be an interesting hire. But does he have enough ties to the West Coast to recruit? Yes... USC recruits itself but that is my one question on Strong. End of the day my money is on Sark.
Has Petrino been sanctioned in the past by the NCAA that would carry over to USC if they hired him?
None that I know of. My thoughts on the whole NCAA take is that they would be more upset with the hiring of Petrino simply because the fact USC is in the mess they are in because of some shady dealings. Why bring a guy in that has had some "moral" issues in his past to add to the mess they already have. He is a great coach and would be scary at USC given the talent he could amass there. Minus his character flaws, he is a great coach on the field.
Personally, I would put Sark at the head of the list. He has done a great job at Washington. His ties to the program also help. Del Rio... that would be a win for everyone else. Good coordinator... not so good a HC. I think Peterson's ship has sailed... he should have left two years ago. Petrino is too much of a risk with his past issues... the NCAA would be all over USC for that potential hire. Strong would be an interesting hire. But does he have enough ties to the West Coast to recruit? Yes... USC recruits itself but that is my one question on Strong. End of the day my money is on Sark.
I don't know if Sark burned any bridges when he left for UW but if so that was pre-Haden. I share your choice.
As for Petrino, I don't understand why the NCAA would have any interest in his hire. His meeting with the Auburn cabal was a question of personal ethics not a NCAA regulation. His affair and hiring his girl friend put his employer at risk for a lawsuit and state employment law violations but again no connection to a NCAA regulation.
Those weren't Tressel-like NCAA situations but rather along the lines of Mike DuBose and Wimp Sanderson having affairs with their secretaries. Unlike Petrino, Sanderson's 15 year affair with his secretary was no secret. My mother-in-law told me about years before the secretary filed a lawsuit following Wimp giving her a black eye. My in-laws were well connected within the inner circle of the UA System back in those days. Seems there were a number of trustee wives unhappy and quite vocal with their husbands tolerating the open flaunting of the affair for the sake of "W"s. But like Petrino, the Sanderson and DuBose scandals were moral and employment issues, not NCAA issues.
Has Petrino been sanctioned in the past by the NCAA that would carry over to USC if they hired him?
Just got off the phone with my younger brother. His friend who plays at USC told my brother that he was "glad" Kiffin got canned and that most of the players felt the same way.
According to Haden, the conversation between he and Kiffin after the team's arrival in Los Angeles lasted about 45 minutes. He told ESPN Radio's Colin Cowherd that the talks were "honest."
"He battled me," Haden said. "… He really battled and made it very difficult. We had a very honest discussion for 45 minutes. At the end of the day, I felt the decision had to be made."
With pieces of ****, like himself.
And they say anal can't cause pregnancy.