The fact that he has a personal assistant is: (fill in the blank)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Alleged Johnny Manziel autograph "proof picture" broker claims he shot <a href="http://t.co/RR7oExSp4o">pic.twitter.com/RR7oExSp4o</a></p>— Joe Schad (@schadjoe) <a href="https://twitter.com/schadjoe/statuses/364406069142880256">August 5, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This guy just needs some proper guidance. Fade away from the spotlight and find some positive growth.
I don't think he's going to find that with this guy as his "manager":
![]()
Look Cam Newton didn't take money, his dad did. J. Football didn't either, his assistant did. So in both situations the player didn't violate the rules. Just the direction I see this heading.
Aren't they different situations though? Cam couldn't have gone anywhere with his dad's signature, so his dad had some level of control.
The only way Manziel could justify Nate taking the money is an advance on his "assistant/manager" role, which I guess is somewhat plausible.
Regardless, I fall into the camp of there's too much smoke for there not to be fire, but it will also be very hard for the NCAA to prove.
Aren't they different situations though? Cam couldn't have gone anywhere with his dad's signature, so his dad had some level of control.
The only way Manziel could justify Nate taking the money is an advance on his "assistant/manager" role, which I guess is somewhat plausible.
Regardless, I fall into the camp of there's too much smoke for there not to be fire, but it will also be very hard for the NCAA to prove.
I can just see him throwing his assistant under the bus claiming he knew nothing about it. Like Cam did. Not that I buy it.
I can just see him throwing his assistant under the bus claiming he knew nothing about it. Like Cam did. Not that I buy it.
Yeah, the moment they let Cam get away with that I thought it opened up a giant loophole. And if they let Manziel get away with this, then everyone will just have a parent/cousin/friend ask for money on their behalf and feign ignorance. We'd be seriously nearing Wild West territory in the NCAA (if we're not already there).
There's a difference between plausible ignorance and specious ignorance.
Plausible Ignorance - Cam not knowing his dad took money when he signed with Auburn.
Specious Ignorance - Johnny signing hundreds of autographs in a hotel room out of the kindness of his heart and not knowing Uncle Nate took money for Johnny's charitable actions.
I'm not defending Cam. I find it hard to believe he didn't know his dad took money, but there is on some level plausibility to his ignorance. I have very little to zero confidence in the NCAA, but I think they'll see right through Johnny's claim of "ignorance" if he goes that route.
This is a good point. A really good point. Well... unless they can show a pattern of behavior where he was going around doing hundreds of autograph signings for free for other dealers... then maybe it becomes more "plausible" that Uncle Nate took money without him knowing and falls on his sword.
The fact that there has been no comment from Manziel's camp yet (and that they pulled him from available athletes at their media day today) is proof positive that they are trying to devise some sort of plan to shield him from liability and keep him eligible. If he simply did not take money to sign autographs, he would come out and say "this never happened and is a lie." He hasn't done that.
What kind of parent encourages any kind of association with someone like this Nate?
The same kind of parents who don't discipline their kids for stealing and doing drugs and getting suspended from school, but instead buy them iPhones and other things. People would rather be their friends instead of their parents. Hopefully we won't glorify them like we have other such parents.
Lax et al, agreed. Uncle Cracker, errrrrr, Uncle Nate, will fall on the sword a la Barry Bonds' BFF (Anderson, I believe) and get paid for it later. And JM walks. Nobody does cheating like the $EC.
I am surprised this picture came out so fast. Usually you don't see any sort of phsyical evidence in these "reports."
Hopefully the fact this has made its way to China and back thanks to twitter the NCAA can't drag its feet.
I'm kinda glad Manziel won the Heisman now. If he didn't we wouldn't have the wonderfully entertaining off season, and it's not over yet. Well done, voters, well done.
Not me. I thought Manti deserved it and was pissed when he didn't win, especially after I saw what kind of person Manziel was. It wasn't until the Cotton Bowl that I conceded Manziel was "special" and also deserved the Heisman, but I still think Manti should have received it based on the 2012 regular season.
How do you see the NCAA getting out of doing the right thing on this one, NDD2?