BK says it doesn't look good.No word on Dru?
No word on Dru?
Agreed. ND dominated a strong team today. I was worried about the D, but they played maybe the best I gave seen them play in recent years.Probably the best home win of the BK era.
Drinking game next week fellas: every time Flutie refers to some player "sticking his nose in there" or some derivative thereof, you take a shot. I.E. goes silent before the end of the second quarter.
Pros:
*Pretty dominating performance, particularly on defense. ND was clearly the better team
*Best defense I've seen us play against triple option...ever. Jaylon and Joe Schmidt are phenomenal.
*Great penetration on defense getting to their quarterback
*Offensive playbook simplified
*Offensive line and pass protection was solid
*CJ Sanders might be our best punt return option since Golden Tate
*Fuller for Heisman might start gaining traction. That 3rd down leaping catch in the 2nd quarter was a huge play in the game.
*Chris Brown finished the game really strong after an awful start
*Farley with the forced fumble right after halftime was huge.
Cons:
*Way too many false starts
*I don't trust Yoon in a big spot. Nice to see him make that fg in the 3rd quarter though
*I feel like we have so many weapons on offense that never get used (Tori Hunter, Corey Robinson, Carlise, ESB)
*Alize Jones is a major disappointment so far but still early in his career
*Tranquill's injury. We're not just getting injuries...we're weekly getting 1-2 season ending injuries.
*Absolutely hated Kelly calling timeouts in the first half to get the ball back. Maybe i do that if Zaire was the QB....but with Yoon shaky and a rookie QB i'd take 13-7 at the half any day instead of expecting him to run the 2-minute drill.
*I just get the feeling Kelly doesn't have too much confidence in Kizer. Maybe that's just an indication of how good Zaire was in camp.
*Why do i have a feeling at the end of the year 30-22 vs. 30-7 might make a difference to the ignorant college football analysts who didn't watch this game.
B-12?
I was thinking the same thing. Everyone going to talk about it being a "close win" and "not blowing anyone out" instead of it being a 30-7 throttling.
Sure. Figures you would say something like B-12 or wheat grass. You wacky Californian you!
@TJamesNDI: What kind of memories will Georgia Tech FB Patrick Skov, a former Stanford player, have of #NotreDame Stadium? "S***. Nightmares."
I'm still calling this an amazing game from our defense.
I was thinking the same thing. Everyone going to talk about it being a "close win" and "not blowing anyone out" instead of it being a 30-7 throttling.
One thing I wanted to point out again was that we really needed to go for 2 to go up 17. Every chart I see online says go for 2 and I really don't see why you wouldn't. Georgia Tech would not have had a chance if we had converted 2 points. Instead they were an onside kick away from a hail mary to tie it.
If we don't pick up two they are a TD and a 2 point conversion away from winning.