Valpodoc85
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,720
- Reaction score
- 466
If states like Kansas, Iowa or North Dakota are open for business July 1 and Indiana is not do you start camp there?
So anyone think this is a step closer to canceling the season?
No.
ND has more control of student athletes than they do campers. Think social distancing, etc. Cancelling camps allows ND also has more time to prepare for the student athletes. Sounds like a prudent move.
https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2020/0421/1132950-coronavirus-public-gatherings/
It's official now - Dublin game is off. Irish Government is not allowing crowds with events of over 5,000.
So ... they could still allow the game if only Navy fans showed up.
So ... they could still allow the game if only Navy fans showed up.
Jack just announced on a live webinar that the announcement from Ireland yesterday specifically excluded live sporting events so that will not be the deciding factor for cancelling the game just yet.
Well, Clemson used to be like us. So maybe this gives us hope that we can get to their level in time.
Well, Clemson used to be like us. So maybe this gives us hope that we can get to their level in time.
Clemson is a really interesting study because they aren't a blue blood. Bama sucked for a long time, then seemingly overnight Saban led them back to their former glory. But the foundation was there, it did not need to be created from scratch. Saban just out-recruited everyone, badly, and it was a dynasty again. That won't work for ND, because ND will never out-recruit everyone to that level again.
Clemson did it from scratch. I'd like to see someone do a write-up of their formula.
What portion of it was luck (taking a chance on Dabo was almost certainly lucky, no one could have predicted his success). But what about the rest?
How did they keep Venables for so long?
Recruiting practices and strategy? They couldn't tout winning for the first several classes. How did they get to where they are?
Facilities (obviously awesome but what differentiated them?)
When looking at Clemson, what I don't think is replicable is becoming the year in year out juggernaut that lands whoever they want on the recruiting trail.
What I do think is replicable, is catching lightning in a bottle with a QB (Buchner) and having a magical season culminating in a Natty, or at least making it heartbreakingly close while legitimately competing. This would be a boost to our recruiting in its own right and would solidify us as a bonafide tier 2 program, but I think there's too many obstacles in place to stop us from becoming Alabama/Clemson of today.
$55M practice facility built in 2017. That's what ND has to compete with. Right now they aren't even close to that. Also, I don't think money was the motivating factor for Shipley going to Clemson over ND.
Notre Dame did build a brand new practice facility in 2018, so in that sense they are competing. The key difference is ND didn't add all the bells and whistles to it like Clemson did. They made the decision to make it a practice facility only, while Clemson made it a complete hangout for football players only that keeps them away from the rest of the student body.
Would anybody be interested in a generic debate/topic thread? I'm getting a bit crazy since nothing is really going on in sports right now, and debating about who was the most underrated WR of the BK era etc would be fun.
Would anybody be interested in a generic debate/topic thread? I'm getting a bit crazy since nothing is really going on in sports right now, and debating about who was the most underrated WR of the BK era etc would be fun.
I'd be down.
Let people make ridiculous (or reasonable, but that's not as fun) claims, then let people challenge the position.
Like the IE Thunderdome, except you know the premise and shouldn't let your feelings get hurt.
100%
Good luck with that lol
Notre Dame did build a brand new practice facility in 2018, so in that sense they are competing. The key difference is ND didn't add all the bells and whistles to it like Clemson did. They made the decision to make it a practice facility only, while Clemson made it a complete hangout for football players only that keeps them away from the rest of the student body.
It's important to note that ND's model, from recruiting to educating and integrating players into campus life, is fundamentally incompatible with the football factories' we're constantly getting compared to.
Easy for me, I have no feelings.
Can you imagine how puny Malpass' checkbook would be if generations of future rainmakers didn't room with, live on the same floor, eat at the same dining hall, take the same theo class, with generations of All American and National Champion players?
I don't really disagree with you here. If ND still wants to compete for championships, we ought to play to win. Conversely, if our admin decides that the game is too dirty now, and that we can't compete with the current elites without compromising our ethical standards, then we ought to talk to Stanford and other like minded programs about forming a separate league. We're in this weird gray area right now where we're doing things very differently from the other blue bloods and insisting that we can still compete despite several significant self-inflicted handicaps. I'm not convinced that's accurate; but either way, I'd prefer for our admin to just decide and go all-in on it.