Some Irish Bloke
Five foot nothin', a hundred and nothin'
- Messages
- 6,346
- Reaction score
- 5,922
steel mill at 8, lol
<iframe width="600" height="400" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-GwCnDiF-_E" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
steel mill at 8, lol
Fellas, these are college fantasy football rankings lol.
Ian is better than many of the guys ahead of him, but he's not going to put up video game numbers like some of them do in their systems, and he doesn't have a schedule that is soft overall like other guys.
Costello is going to put up monster numbers passing the ball, probably, because that's what Stanford has to do now. Herbert is gonna put up video game numbers at Oregon because of the system. Ehlinger is going to throw deep TD's and score 1-yard rushing TD's all year against crap Big XII defenses. Those guys are more valuable in *College Fantasy Football* because of stats.
Ian will put up some nice stats this year, I'm sure, and hopefully ends up better than the 18th scoring QB... but with our defense and the way Long's offense seems to spread the wealth in the redzone, it's unlikely that he will outscore some of those guys in the top 10, regardless of how well the year goes for ND.
Pittsburgh's soft. I was shop foreman in the boiler by 8. . . but that's Gary for ya.
Offseason dude. Not much else to discuss as we depart the final agonizing month of the offseason.
I would agree with you that these rankings heavily favor stat padders like Herbert and Costello, so Book's lack of video game numbers would hurt them.
But that doesn't explain guys like Jake Fromm, Shea Patterson, Jalen Hurts, Khalil Tate, Joe Burrow, Brock Purdy, Bryce Perkins and Tyler Johnston. Book had stats just as good or better than pretty much all of them.
Then you have Justin Fields, who hasn't even taken a meaningful snap of college football, ahead of Book...what!?
This is getting me too hyped
Agreed. Read that entire article, lots of things to be excited about.
Basically PFF has our safeties are a top 3 unit, our QB is a top 10, our DEs are graded as the best (that only includes Okwara, Kareem and Hayes) and they graded our OL as very good and expected to be better.
They didn't mention WR (which we are high on) and RB or LBs.
We know 1 of the 3 LBs looks to be a burgeoning star....
Hopefully we handle business against Louisville and get a lot of game experience for our roster.
This is getting me too hyped
As a first-year starter, Book bailed on the pocket far too often and had the most pressures allocated to himself among all college football quarterbacks (29 total). Out of those 29 pressures, 18 ended as a sack which was seven more than any other college quarterback. This type of instinct is as expected from a first-year college starter, and it has been proven that performance under pressure is unstable from year to year, so as a result, if Book trusts the pocket and his offensive line, good things will come.
The Irish O-line returns four of their five 2018 starters, and three of those ranked in the top-12 at their respective position in PFF grade among returning power five and independent lineman (left guard Aaron Banks, right guard Tommy Kraemer and right tackle Robert Hainsey). Whether it was a run play or a pass play, the Irish o-line excelled. When run-blocking, the Notre Dame o-line unit ranked 20th in PFF run-block grade and assisted on giving their backfield 2.5 yards before contact on designed run plays (22nd). As far as pass-blocking goes, Notre Dame’s line allowed a lowly 14.8% pressure rate (13th) and just six total sacks (ninth-fewest).
Can anyone explain why we're number 5 in their aggregigate and number 4 in their preseason poll? I know PFF is usually a pure stats site so I'm wondering what accounts for the difference where we jumped LSU in the preseason poll?
One variable is each team's 2019 schedule.
Their stats are based on last year (team) and the career stats of the entire roster. Maybe in their eyes, ND's stat rating x '19 SOS moves ND up a spot vs LSU because LSU's SOS is higher?
So what's the disconnect? On passing plays they apparently credit some pressures to the QB rather than allocating all pressures to the o line. But there's no denying ND had a pretty high stuff rate on run plays.
How good is Jalen Elliot?
As of last year, he's an excellent college safety and I'll say starting NFL safety in time. Either for the team that drafts him after some NFL development or for his second team in free agency.
I've argued it's by design. I always thought HH/Long's philosophy was like a boxer's. Jab, Jab, look for an opening, set it up and go for the knockout. ND always seemed to set up big runs behind McG/Q with garbage calls designed to get teams shifted away from the left side where the back only had one LB/S to beat once he went through the MCG-Q tunnel.
Ok. I'm not doubting him, but I just don't watch him enough to know.
Is he actually THAT good? Is he a NFL player? UDFA or drafted?
Or is he solid, which is markedly better than what we've had at safety in the past, and playing aside a great college safety in Gilman has made him look better than he actually is?
Ok. I'm not doubting him, but I just don't watch him enough to know.
Is he actually THAT good? Is he a NFL player? UDFA or drafted?
Or is he solid, which is markedly better than what we've had at safety in the past, and playing aside a great college safety in Gilman has made him look better than he actually is?
Good stuff - thanks guys. I'm really excited about this safety duo. Just couldn't personally recall if Jalen was "that good" or if he just was our most solid sefety in a while, and with Gilman being a stud it helped Elliot look better than he is.
Ok. I'm not doubting him, but I just don't watch him enough to know.
Is he actually THAT good? Is he a NFL player? UDFA or drafted?
Or is he solid, which is markedly better than what we've had at safety in the past, and playing aside a great college safety in Gilman has made him look better than he actually is?
This is getting me too hyped