calvegas04
Well-known member
- Messages
- 11,861
- Reaction score
- 8,440
great result, F mexico
New Gold Cup jersey is pretty sweet
![]()
Well done Germany. Well done. Send the trash back to the receptacle.
This should be a GREAT final... looking forward to it.
Vidal (here comes heresy) is one of the best five players in the world --- maybe best three. I watch him every play. Those astounding Jock plays where he flies way up, gets knocked down, bounces on the ground and still gets to the ball and heads it to a teammate --- nobody else does stuff like that. I watched a Germany corner which Vidal was as usual down low in the meathouse. Ball was deflected out front and everyone slowly turned, EXCEPT Vidal. He was already back on his feet and head down in full sprint right at the German attacker at whose feet it was landing. EVERYONE ELSE WAS STANDING LOOKING. He closed enough to ruin the shot. DAMM that guy is good. If I was choosing a team, and knew I couldn't have Messi or Ronaldo, Vidal is my choice.
WARRIOR
And it sure was ... what a great game to watch. Chile will rue those missed chances. At least three absolute sitters blown. True, Germany could have scored more as well, but still, I'd say Chile were the better team overall. Sanchez and Vidal showed their quality throughout. They just didn't bring their goal-scoring boots.
As a Bayern supporter, I'm hardly unbiased, but I agree that players like Vidal--a tenacious enforcer who can reliably boss the midfield from box to box for a full 90 minute-- are hard to find and frequently underrated.
Tough to compare him to guys like Messi and Ronaldo, though, since the roles they fill are so different. Transfermarkt indicates those two currently have 3-4 times Vidal's transfer value.
Keep in mind Germany didn't bring its best. Very experimental line up by the coach in prep for next year.
I've been a big Germany fan since '06.
Keep in mind Germany didn't bring its best. Very experimental line up by the coach in prep for next year.
Lukaku to United. Morata talks have stopped.
Can someone explain this to me? Mourinho didn't want him at Chelsea but wants him at United? Has Lukaku improved at all over the years?
Of course, it is hard to dress up a fee of £75m as any sort of bargain, though in the present climate Lukaku is probably worth it. He scored 25 Premier League goals last season, he is only 24 years old and at his best he can terrorise defences through sheer physical presence and power. He is not exactly a new Didier Drogba but he is a close approximation, and for a coach like Mourinho who likes to play with a big, obvious target at the front he was always going to be of interest once Zlatan Ibrahimovic was ruled out.
...
Prolific goalscorers who are 6ft 2in and around 15st are simply not that easy to come by. Because of his imposing stature it is easy to characterise Lukaku as a blunt instrument, a big fella up front, a prominent target at which to aim hopeful long balls. He can operate in such a way, in fairness, he has good touch and positional awareness and can not only hold the ball up until support arrives but usually play a decent pass to set up an attack.
Yet Lukaku is more like a youthful Wayne Rooney than a reincarnation of Duncan Ferguson. He is at his best with the ball at his feet, running at defenders and more often than not making inroads through his pace and control.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Lukaku transfer saga isn't over yet. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MUFC?src=hash">#MUFC</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CFC?src=hash">#CFC</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/EFC?src=hash">#EFC</a> <a href="https://t.co/od3EvhRD3v">https://t.co/od3EvhRD3v</a></p>— NBC Sports Soccer (@NBCSportsSoccer) <a href="https://twitter.com/NBCSportsSoccer/status/883424443346939904">July 7, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Hold on to your butts ...