Why so much hate for our OL? It's obvious they'll have their hands full but it seems like you already expect them to lay an egg. Do you think they'll be able to hold up at all in pass pro?
I think our OL is pretty athletic but they're young and still learning. Most OL take a couple years to have everything 'click'.
I don't think it's hate lol. It's just honestly. Take a read
here. The stats are pretty ugly. Also a lot of our OL issues have been masked/minimized by Book's quick release, and the short game. It's one of the biggest reasons we don't do well with plays that take longer to develop, and in the deep game in general. As bad as those stats are, they would be a lot worse had we stuck with BW.
It’s not hate. I try to leave emotion out of it but I backslide at times like most fans. I’ll leave it to the experts that analyze ND’s performance & the consensus from them (Driskell, Prister) is Mustipher has actually regressed this season (likely due to the loss of the left side combined w/ the fact that he’s shown on film that he “catches blocks” more times than he truly fires off the ball. Kraemer is good going north/south but he is horribly slow & unathletic when asked to pull & is usually too late to the defender to perform his job. On the positive side, I hope Eichenberg has been able to get closer to 100% & we see better performance on the left side along w/ Banks. I didn’t realize he was playing w/ a bum wheel so knowing he can be at full strength may be a hidden key to the game.
If ND’s rushing attack is somewhere in between the Pitt & FSU performance (2 outliers), the Northwestern game was close to what we can expect as the mean. Even the most Pollyannish fan has to admit that Clemson’s depth & athleticism dwarfs what NW could ever hope to have. I think Irish fans are going to be surpised how much the Clemson DL outperforms all the hype they’ve been given leading up to this matchup.
Not sure they will outperform the hype, but they will damn good. Our OL, if put in a bad position will look very bad.....
I really like these two tweets:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Another statistical nugget. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NotreDame?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NotreDame</a> faced 6 offenses that finished in the Top 50 in passing offense. ND's pass efficiency rating on D in those games was 97.84. <br><br>For context, a 97.84 rating over the course of the entire season would rank the defense 2nd nationally.</p>— Bryan Driskell (@BGI_CoachD) <a href="https://twitter.com/BGI_CoachD/status/1077037810987732992?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 24, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Came across an interesting stat tonight working on a magazine article. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NotreDame?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NotreDame</a> averaged 190.5 rushing yards per game this season, but against the four Top 50 run defenses it face the Irish averaged 222.5 yards per game on the ground, including 365 vs. FSU and 272 vs. Stanford</p>— Bryan Driskell (@BGI_CoachD) <a href="https://twitter.com/BGI_CoachD/status/1076995501936046086?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 24, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Our DBs are damn good, but the 6 team thing is a little misleading. Only 1/6 was inside the top 25 (Stanford). And we all know the PAC has really sucked this year. UC Davis actually held Costello to a lower QBR/Rating than us as a point of OoC perspective. He didn't rate higher than an 81 in any OoC games.
The rush D stat is the same. Only one team in the top 25 rushing yards per game (#17 Michigan). And in that game, our true RBs had 77 yards. We've had some really good games, but also some stinkers. Clemson is #3 and on another level.
I agree. Even w/ the offense playing w/ one tied beind its back (insisting on BW working on pass game), it’s hard to argue how bad ND’s offense performed at home vs a MAC cellar dweller.
I also agree that ND plays down to teams more than teams play up to the Irish.
No, ND is not Clemson’s Super Bowl but I’m confident Dabo & Co. has instilled into their players that ND is playing the “no respect” card as witnessed on the first episode of their FB series and that Clemson better not overlook them. So it may not be their Super Bowl, but it’s hard to see ND winning this game on paper. Thankfully, it’s not played on paper.
ND definitely loses on paper. If you haven't already, take a look at Whiskey's post from a few days ago. It's a great look (2 articles) looking at the match ups. It's a depressing read, so make sure you have bourbon or scotch on hand

. BUT, I think ND can compete. Clemson hasn't really played anyone, and stats don't always tell the truth (even advanced ones). I'm suspect of a lot of things, except their DL lol..
Neither team should play down. But I like the no-respect factor ND is getting. I doubt Dabo will let his kids get big heads, but a coach can't always change mentality.
If you look at that stats that's not even remotely true...
Q1 ... ND 119 -Opp 30
Q2 ... ND 112 - Opp 62
Q3 ... ND 103 - Opp 38
Q4 ... ND 75 - Opp 77
Were entering halftime with an almost a 12 point lead on average. Then were averaging almost a TD onto that lead as we head into the 4th quarter.... based on the numbers above, that means on average we are entering the 4th quarter with a 17 point lead.... we definitely take the slow and steady route to get there but we certainly get there
We have been like 2 different teams this year. In our closer games, we looked like crap in the first half. Especially after the first scripted drive. IMO Long has tried to be a little too cute in the later 1Q and 2Q. Typically in those games he's gone back to what Book does well in the 3Q. It's averaged out, but there's been a tale of two teams if you go back and look at it by game.
Clemson has a truly elite DL and is amazing against the run, and ND's OL has not been able to consistently open up holes this season.
We should throw the ball 50 times in this game and pray it works. If we run the ball more than 15 times we did something horribly wrong.
I agree the game rest on Book's arm, but I do think we'll be able to run via Dex a little more than 15 times IF Book is on fire out of the gate.
I think if your second statement is true, it will mean ND has no choice but to pass b/c they’re down big early. That means more forced throws by Book which means more interceptions. The final result would be an embarrassing blowout. Again, that’s just me...could be 100% wrong but Chip Long knows he has to stick to the run in hopes we keep Clemson off guard.
I don't think it has anything to do with being down at all. It's simply doing what we do best (short passing game) vs what they do worst (their pass D). And doing it from the start till they try to compensate, or hopefully over compensate.
If that's the case, I give us less of a chance to get the W. I'm not saying we have to hand it off 30 times but forget the PA pass if we only plan on running it 3-4/quarter.
It'll be interesting to see how Kelly and Long scheme this thing. I know our OL has had it's difficulties this year but I was hopeful they just needed rest and some more practice together.
I know Clemson's DL presents a huge challenge. Hopefully our DL can present a similar challenge to them.
LAX IMO is spot on. Our best chance is to pass early, pass a bunch, pass it QUICK, spread it out, and pass it short/intermediate (what we know works). If we are successful, Clemson's D will make adjustments and then, we might be successful running and throwing deeper. Attacking their pass D is absolutely the best strategy.