I don't believe he ever gives to athletics.
The problem with these "neutral" site games is that they're either in places not worth visiting or they're in places that aren't really built around football. I went down to Miami for the 2012 game. The beaches were nice but no train to the stadium and a general lack of sports bars and beer access made it a subpar football experience. Give me Chicago or NYC for a real neutral site experience. It's not like Atlanta's 50 degrees and rainy is that much better than the Midwest anyway.
Me too but they don't let you choose.
Wish KVA was a go.
Yeah, you can almost miss the fact (with all his completions) that ND's DL and blitzers were a step or even half a step away from sacking Maiva on many of his throws. He does have fast-decision making ability.
And yes, it seems that Rourke is not the scrambler/runner he was pre-injury at Ohio U.
And despite his size, he never lowers his shoulder. He makes business decisions when he has the ball in his hands.
Never mind! Go Irish.
Not sure of your point. IU is a state school. Just pointing out that they have upped their game now that Cignetti is the HC.
The vast majority of power schools are public. The only private ones that come to mind are ND? SC, SMU, TCU, Baylor, Wake, Miami, Vandy, and Northwestern. Most of them are not exactly football schools.
What IU is doing is extremely impressive. I am simply pointing out that there may be other schools that have stepped up their NIL game that could be on this list as well, but they are private(ND, SMU, USC...). Not trying to knock what IU has done, just stating it is incomplete.
Gametime is great, they also show you prices including all the fees built in. Saves a lot of time
I think IU basketball recruits fine (based on star value). They are either not developing them, or the recruiting services really suck in basketball. Feels like they get a min of 1+ 5* a year.
I had the same thing happen. I almost want to believe that it’s intentional to get the people who bid on premium seats to be more likely to get in the stadium. Because almost nobody is going to choose to pay $10 more for lower endzone compared to anywhere on the sideline. As a result, it could create a large pool of seats that catches all the overflow from the $250 and $200 price points, without much competition from people entering the lottery at the $160 price point.
Be careful on the ticket resellers like SeatGeek & StubHub as well. Not that those particular companies are trying to scam you but weird things can go happen if you don’t do your due diligence & confirm a seat you want actually exists.
Why? This isn't just any game.
Been saying they're paper tigers who preyed on vastly inferior teams. All sizzle, no steak.
Fact. But we need more rizz...
I’m more surprised than anything. They’ve made some changes in the past, but they’ve been more like bandaids. After years of basically ignoring FB, it looks like they finally realized how much money they can make if they can get butts in the seats.
