<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/P3gf6qyAHOw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
What a basic bitch.
1. In what world does a character need to
change their personality to have an arc? In Die Hard, Hans Gruber and John McLane are the same people throughout the entire movie and the movie is great. So her entire premise is flawed.
2. "The action is bad"... OK sooooo she's just an obvious troll. Should I keep watching? Fuck it, I'll keep watching.
3A. "The movie wasn't dark, no deaths were sad"... Jyn/Cassian death is intentionally NOT sad because the movie is a about
hope. Asian dude's death was hella sad. "His death wasn't even epic"... ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING??!? That slow walk through laser fire was incredibly tense and emotional because -- unlike other Star Wars movies with protected characters -- you knew he could die. "But then the force stopped protecting him?" she says like it doesn't make
perfect fucking sense that the Force would protect him to accomplish something vitally important to the balance of the universe but not just give him total invulnerability in the battle forever. Good lord she is so obvious in her torlling... or just really stupid... or a Communist, like greyhammer.
My wife cried 4 times watching the movie. I know less emotional people who cried over a fucking ROBOT'S death they did such a good job with him. But she says the robot was stupid too, because (insert bullshit about his dialogue that makes no sense). *eye roll* I guess she's just sooooo edgy and jaded.
3B. "Jyn's mom gets shot so she won't be used as a hostage"... no, she gets shot trying to kill Krennic... "even though her husband has already decided he's going to build it to put a weakness in it"... WHAT. THE. FUCK! That's not true! He says in the fucking hologram that he doesn't decide to do that until way later.
"Forest Whittaker stays behind for no reason".... umm, no he stays behind because he thinks he'll slow Jyn and everyone down, because he's a cripple...
"Erso is accidental collateral damage"... no, he is INTENTIONAL damage from a military strike that was in error and causes tension/dissension and shows that war is complicated; unlike a lot of black-and-white Star Wars cliche in the other movies. This is a war movie. Deal with it.
"Asian guy doesn't try to get back"... because he accepted his fate before even walking out and accomplished his goal which is bigger than self-survival. and he knows that there is literally no chance he makes it back, because the Force only protected him to accomplish this larger goal.
"Legs got tired and did not see explosive in time"... dude was wounded, in a pinned down position, and unless you believe in Hollywood bullshit where people casually walk away from concussive blasts you cannot outrun a grenade that is right next to you. Sorry to burst your bubble of sci fi cliches.
"Bomb accidentally kills Body"... no, the Imperials are aware of him & his compatriots ship and intentionally destroy it with an explosive.
So she's made that there any "noble sacrifice." THE ENTIRE MISSION WAS A GIANT NOBLE SACRIFICE BY EVERY VOLUNTEER! Jesus titty fucking christ. Not everything can be some giant "save yourself!" cliche sacrifice which is rarely done well (Hodor, Gandalf). Why is that some sort of pre-requisite for a good war film? It makes no sense. "No satisfying blaze of glory moment"... cool, got buy a ticket for Transformers then and enjoy your tropes.
I quit, can't watch the other 7. I've reached my fill of idiocy for the day. Top starred youtube comment says it perfectly: "
you seemed disappointed that the movie wasn't 100% cliche." So true... her whining about how the the Asian dude didn't take out 50 storm troopers by himself on the way to the switch illustrates it best.