I had this exact conversation with someone last week where I was like “if they had gone through the process and hired Gino as the OC I don’t think anyone would’ve batted an eye”… where I’m skeptical on Parker is that an OC needs to have feel for the game and know what to dial up / when to dial it up and for some reason you look at him and think “I’ll believe it when I see it.” He just doesn’t have the “vibe” or resume/track record to justify faith that he knows how to gameplan or call a game. But we’ll see sooner rather than later, he’ll have an opportunity to prove himself.
I watch UC every week. Gino is a great QB coach, and might turn into a great recruiter with ND and Freeman at his disposal.
He is NOT what ND needed at OC right now. That’s not to say Parker is, either, or that Gino can’t grow to be a promote-to-OC guy in a year or two… but tapping Gino for OC straight from UC would have been a bigger risk than promoting Parker, IMO.
Gino the OC is currently a slightly worse version of ND Mike Denbrock (which is different from LSU Mike Denbrock, which is different from UC Mike Denbrock). Lack of playcalling rhythm, late getting plays in, noticeable lack of involving his best weapons at times; it was perplexing at times last season for UC.
Replacing Desmond Ridder would have been a tough task for any coach in the country… but Gino didn’t help mitigate the situation the way an established, comfortable OC would have.
It is interesting though. I am friends with a lot of UC grads and they love Gino the QB coach and didn't really like him as the OC. Their complaints are a lot of what your concerns are for Parker. They mostly feel like he didn't have a good feel for the game and called the wrong plays at the wrong time. I mean, I take it with a grain of salt as it is fans complaining about an OC - I am familiar with those types of fans...
Bingo!