Here's the thing...
Why bother comparing two unlike players. while attempting to project their "career".
Why not compare DJ Harvey to DJ Jackson while we're at it. Both were similarly "good recruits."
Why not compare to Carleton Scott? Why was VJ even brought up? I'm not the only one that noticed this absurdity (Crazy Balki as well).
Dude, you shift the argument constantly. You did it earlier in the thread, and you keep moving the target.
Literally go read my statements, and then what you quote. You LITERALLY said that I was writing him off after I said he wouldn't reach his ceiling, even after I complimented him on what his ceiling "could" be. This is a forum, there are receipts.
I brought up a Notre Dame player who also didn't reach his ceiling, but turned out to be a rather successful player.
Now, it's not about that, it's about the comparison of the players themselves and their specific skill sets.
Here was the point - I said he won't reach his ceiling, and thought he'd be a good role player moving forward. You suggested I wrote him off. I gave an example of a player who I don't believe reached his ceiling, even after 4 years (again, a comment you made about only 1 year in Brey's offense). You then pivoted to comparing the skill sets of the individual players. But because their roles aren't exactly the same, somehow that validates the initial "Write-off" comment?
Edit: I mean, it's literally in the posts. Here is what I said, among other things, about Harvey:
You cite his knee. His inability to defend (even in zone), willingness to rebound, and being behind some of the freshman in knowing how to play on a team isn't because he hurt his knee. As Noie and the guys on II said, he's been the same player since the age of 15 (I honestly have no idea how accurate that is, but with two sources saying the same thing, I tend to believe it).
Harvey being able to create his own won't be what holds him back. It's the mental aspect. Which, in the quote you referenced, is probably why Brey sat him for the first 6 minutes after half, and he played his second lowest minute total (second to the BC game, when he equally awful and played only 21).
Great would probably be too strong a word for me at this point, I'd have to see a few more games where he looks engaged like the GT game, but at worst he would give us that guy who can create his own late in the clock, which this team just doesn't have.
You responded to this by saying I was writing him off. And now, we're at comparing the offensive skill sets to VJ Beachem. You're right, you can use this comparison for Carlton Scott, or Demetrius Jackson, or Scott Martin, or whomever else you feel inclined to make it for. The point was that not all players reach their potential. Not whether they're a slasher or a shooter. I mean, I literally agreed with Crazy Balki's assessment that they aren't the same player, but you ignored that, again, and continued down the comparison lane.
I am more than happy to be wrong about DJ. I honestly hope I am. I hope he averages 18-6-4 and makes all ACC. But not thinking he'll reach that level isn't some indictment on him as a player, the program, or the coaching.