'17 CA OT Aaron Banks (Notre Dame Early Enrollee)

N

ND Fan Vancouver

Guest
I can't believe how many people on here bad mouth HH. Give your heads a shake!!
 
N

ND Fan Vancouver

Guest
Stanley has been great, even dominate at times. I've seen a few Ravens games this year and they got themselves a great LT to anchor their line for years. Another player off HH we could mention is Steve Elmer. Had he kept playing he would've been a solid NFL player I'd say. Also, Alex Bars will likely play in the NFL. Probably a late round depth pick at least.
 

GBdomer

People's Champion
Messages
6,845
Reaction score
555
I kind of agree with Calvs here I know we were breaking in three new starters but which game did our Oline dominate the D line? Why was our run game piss poor? I know play calling was suspect Heistand can recruit and develop certain players but as a whole our O line is pretty inconsistent over the years.
 

Junkhead

Community Mod
Messages
7,595
Reaction score
1,354
BTW Loy with the CB to ND

That's all I'm gonna say about that

56738997.jpg
 
N

ND Fan Vancouver

Guest
Not sure if it's been mentioned on this thread yet or not but Wiltfong is now leaning toward ND as of this evening. Said it's what he thinks after speaking with the best source he knows regarding Banks. Says it's an ND/Mich battle
 

ResLife Hero

Well-known member
Messages
6,737
Reaction score
190
It's a guess by Loy, I am not getting into this. I've told the board I am done with this.

It's seriously a guess:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">… That said, it’s been A TON of fun covering <a href="https://twitter.com/bigaaronbanks">@bigaaronbanks</a>’ recruitment. Everyone that covered him would agree. He has everyone guessing.</p>— Tom Loy (@TomLoy247) <a href="https://twitter.com/TomLoy247/status/807063594609295360">December 9, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

NDdomer2

Local Sports vBookie
Messages
17,050
Reaction score
3,875
Sounds like everyone is guessing though. I can understand a Homer pick in that instance.
 

GBdomer

People's Champion
Messages
6,845
Reaction score
555
Sounds like everyone is guessing though. I can understand a Homer pick in that instance.

It's just always a homer pick. Honestly all the prospects other than Sarrell that we are after Loy has CB'd them to ND
 

NDdomer2

Local Sports vBookie
Messages
17,050
Reaction score
3,875
It's just always a homer pick. Honestly all the prospects other than Sarrell that we are after Loy has CB'd them to ND

Never said it wasnt his m.o. just in this discussion case nobody knows what are they supposed to do, nothing?

So much for not getting into it about Loy....
 

Southside Sully

Well-known member
Messages
1,691
Reaction score
439
It's just always a homer pick. Honestly all the prospects other than Sarrell that we are after Loy has CB'd them to ND

And if you call him out on all his homer picks he gets his panties in a bunch it's actually funny
 

GBdomer

People's Champion
Messages
6,845
Reaction score
555
Never said it wasnt his m.o. just in this discussion case nobody knows what are they supposed to do, nothing?

So much for not getting into it about Loy....

I wasn't calling you out man, just adding to the subject. Now i'm done
 

Crazy Balki

Site Assigned Optimist
Messages
7,868
Reaction score
4,477
I think the staff has turned the heat up on Banks and that's paying off. I also assume this means Sarrel is probably staying west.

I think HH does a fantastic job of developing offensive linemen, but I have yet to see him consistently build top notch offensive lines. It's one thing to get guys like Martin x2, Watt and Stanley drafted early, but it's another to have a cohesive unit that can completely physically dominate the defensive lines. Part of that has to do with Kelly's scheme, since linemen are asked to play in space more and our running game consists are far too much perimeter and slow-developing runs. In addition, the S&C is god-awful, considering we have at least 2 starters that are playing woefully underweight. How does McGovern weigh in at 315 prior to fall camp and then lose nearly 40 pounds by season's end!?
 

beryirish

Dry Land Is Not A Myth!
Messages
5,949
Reaction score
539
I kind of agree with Calvs here I know we were breaking in three new starters but which game did our Oline dominate the D line? Why was our run game piss poor? I know play calling was suspect Heistand can recruit and develop certain players but as a whole our O line is pretty inconsistent over the years.

Three new starters plus McG learning a new more important position. Nonetheless, of all the ND coaches - HH is one of the least ones to gripe about.
 

dublinirish

Everestt Gholstonson
Messages
27,335
Reaction score
13,096
I think the staff has turned the heat up on Banks and that's paying off. I also assume this means Sarrel is probably staying west.

I think HH does a fantastic job of developing offensive linemen, but I have yet to see him consistently build top notch offensive lines. It's one thing to get guys like Martin x2, Watt and Stanley drafted early, but it's another to have a cohesive unit that can completely physically dominate the defensive lines. Part of that has to do with Kelly's scheme, since linemen are asked to play in space more and our running game consists are far too much perimeter and slow-developing runs. In addition, the S&C is god-awful, considering we have at least 2 starters that are playing woefully underweight. How does McGovern weigh in at 315 prior to fall camp and then lose nearly 40 pounds by season's end!?

Driskell on ISD over the summer said he reckoned Joe Schmidt ended the 2015 season playing at under 200 lbs...as a senior middle line backer for peat's sakes :S
 

NDinL.A.

New member
Messages
8,121
Reaction score
1,734
I kind of agree with Calvs here I know we were breaking in three new starters but which game did our Oline dominate the D line? Why was our run game piss poor? I know play calling was suspect Heistand can recruit and develop certain players but as a whole our O line is pretty inconsistent over the years.

Don't agree with calvegas here at all. IMO it has MUCH more to do with the S&C coach/program, and the philosophy of the head coach. Those things aren't on the offensive line coach. After the NC State game I made the mistake of bitching about the offensive line (after drinking a few too many) to a friend who played D-line in college and covers college football as a reporter for a living. Here was his exact response:

"I really don't think Heistand deserves the blame. McGovern weighs less than when he was as a HS senior! That's not on Heistand. Plus, anyone you talk to around the nation says he is the best OL coach in the country or close to it. Everybody I know praises him. The reason you don't see ND getting a push isn't because of Heistand, it's because of Longo. You think Martin, Martin, Watt, Stanley etc can't get a push in college but can suddenly get it in the pros?"

Yeah, that kinda shut me up right there. I've heard much more since about the S&C coach to make me realize that it's a clown show over there and Kelly is going to rue the day he kept Longo on for so long, just as he did BVG (and Booker).
 

tko

I am Legend
Messages
8,516
Reaction score
1,710
Don't agree with calvegas here at all. IMO it has MUCH more to do with the S&C coach/program, and the philosophy of the head coach. Those things aren't on the offensive line coach. After the NC State game I made the mistake of bitching about the offensive line (after drinking a few too many) to a friend who played D-line in college and covers college football as a reporter for a living. Here was his exact response:



Yeah, that kinda shut me up right there. I've heard much more since about the S&C coach to make me realize that it's a clown show over there and Kelly is going to rue the day he kept Longo on for so long, just as he did BVG (and Booker).

AMEN!!!!!
 

Henges24

BUCKETHEAD
Messages
4,807
Reaction score
1,584
I wasn't calling you out man, just adding to the subject. Now i'm done

<iframe src='//gifs.com/embed/now-i-m-done-brady-quinn-Kkb5Xb' frameborder='0' scrolling='no' width='360px' height='270px' style='-webkit-backface-visibility: hidden;-webkit-transform: scale(1);'' ></iframe>
 

Sherm Sticky

The Prophet
Messages
19,321
Reaction score
1,638
Don't agree with calvegas here at all. IMO it has MUCH more to do with the S&C coach/program, and the philosophy of the head coach. Those things aren't on the offensive line coach. After the NC State game I made the mistake of bitching about the offensive line (after drinking a few too many) to a friend who played D-line in college and covers college football as a reporter for a living. Here was his exact response:



Yeah, that kinda shut me up right there. I've heard much more since about the S&C coach to make me realize that it's a clown show over there and Kelly is going to rue the day he kept Longo on for so long, just as he did BVG (and Booker).
Just want to point out that Koon first said this years ago.
 

Domina Nostra

Well-known member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
1,388
I kind of agree with Calvs here I know we were breaking in three new starters but which game did our Oline dominate the D line? Why was our run game piss poor? I know play calling was suspect Heistand can recruit and develop certain players but as a whole our O line is pretty inconsistent over the years.

Compared to who? Who has a line that is just dominates the other team play after play regardless of play calling, their own RBs, and the other team's DL?

Before you can get into who is a great coach, you have to ask who they have, who they play, and what their offensive philosophy is. To me, our offense this year was a white hot mess. It basically reacts to the defense and sets up for big chunk plays. Not sure how your running game is going to look good playing that way.

When we commit to the run--think the last drive at Stanford last year--Harry's boys do a great job.
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,457
Reaction score
8,537
So using the excuse of "We don't have a training table" for years wasn't really the issue?
 
K

koonja

Guest
Don't agree with calvegas here at all. IMO it has MUCH more to do with the S&C coach/program, and the philosophy of the head coach. Those things aren't on the offensive line coach. After the NC State game I made the mistake of bitching about the offensive line (after drinking a few too many) to a friend who played D-line in college and covers college football as a reporter for a living. Here was his exact response:



Yeah, that kinda shut me up right there. I've heard much more since about the S&C coach to make me realize that it's a clown show over there and Kelly is going to rue the day he kept Longo on for so long, just as he did BVG (and Booker).

Reps.
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
So using the excuse of "We don't have a training table" for years wasn't really the issue?

No that was absolutely part of the issue. Literally every single big time football program has a training table. Not having a training table was a handicap.

Nutrition is under the strength and conditioning umbrella usually, and I think there are deficiencies with nutrition as well as the training program. Even a perfect training regimen is rendered useless without proper nutrition.
 
Top