Honestly...has he been more right than wrong? He definitely is not an "everything is rosy" type of guy, and he is more negative than I am some of the time, but he is not as negative as some of you are painting. He does have many positive things to say, when he feels they are positive. He has many platitudes he has said about the team, and he calls things out when he thinks they are not-so-good.
Personally, I will take that all day over "we're going 12-0 baby!!!" that you often hear elsewhere. I've learned a lot about recruiting, the dirty antics of other coaches, the way recruits and recruiters talk about ND, etc since joining his old IrishEyes site like 12 years ago. And then when you talk to him at a tailgate, you REALLY get to hear about how dirty other recruiters are.
And one more thing...if you are a reporter and you have sources all over the Gug, you hear about the real shit that is going on. You hear that not all players give a shit, you hear what players will never play a down for the school, you hear which coaches aren't very good, you hear which coaches refuse to recruit hard, you hear which recruits want to be recruited by ND but ND never reaches out to them, etc etc. It gives you an insight to the program and why you might have a tough year (or, you might have a great year).
Anyway, it's a matter of preference. ISD is actually the most positive of al 4 pay-sites I have tried, and it's not close really. Mike is more pessimistic (or "keeps it real" - depending on your perspective), but the site overall, including the other reporters, is decidedly more upbeat than other sites. Makes for a good balance IMHO.
/end of my weekly defend ISD post haha.
Also, weird swings especially with players. He will be negative (which is fine it's his delivery that makes it so much worse) then he'll be like, "McGovern is gonna win the RG job. I really do think that," like he said a couple weeks ago. Just bizarre stuff from time to time. Last podcast, telling everyone Stepherson is the second best receiver. Eh, don't know bout that.
I don't think he's overly negative at all. Its not like he's complaining while we're going 11-1 every year.
Bruh ... which one is it? If you didn't like Recruit X when he committed, why didn't you tell us that? Don't come out and let me know in 2016 that you thought a recruit was trash in 2014 when you were praising him at the time of his verbal.
That's easy to answer...you don't trash high school kids. That's his rationale and pretty much that of every reporter, really. If you read them enough, you can tell when a reporter/analyst likes a kid and when he doesn't. I had a beer with a couple reporters a couple nights ago and this is exactly what they said. There are guys that they like, and guys that they don't think will be very good at all, but they don't rip the HS kid. Instead, they say things like "has potential" and "raw" and "needs work but there is talent there", which is code for "I'm not very high on this kid at all, but hopefully he pans out".
Also, keep in mind that the high school kids and their families listen to these podcasts and read these websites. It's simply not good for business to tell the world that a HS recruit isn't good, and you sure as hell are not going to keep your sources at the Gug (i.e. coaches) if you are trashing the kids they are recruiting. You have to find a balance, which most reporters not named Loy do.grin:
So...that Stepherson kid seems like a good one.
explain.
Oh, I'm aware of that -- I was a high school sports reporter for nearly a decade. But with Mike, he will describe every recruit that isn't a five-star the same way (a lot of potential), tell me a class is great on signing day then crap on it two years down the road. There *is* no line to read between with him, at least as it pertains to commits.
Only probably I have with Frank is he can make statements that can be bigger than he meant to based on just his feeling on a particular day. With someone of his importance in ND reporting, ppl can run with stuff like that. For instance one week he was talking up ND and Echols and then the next week suddenly he doesn't see it. But both times no evidence just his feeling.
For someone of his stature, just think it would be more responsible to not say anything rather then think aloud. Jason Sapp was best at this. People aren't paying for your random personal thoughts, they pay for information.
How's Stepherson looking so far?
Not as good as Mike Frank would like, apparently.
No shit huh?
Did you forget your comma, or your period?
Agreed. He won't be as quick as Will Fuller but I see a lot of him in KS.
and the 3
.I was reviewing his ratings and offer lists. Once again this proves the theory offer list over star rankings.
Composite 3 star #596 overall and #92 WR (what a joke)
Offers from: Notre Dame, Florida, LSU, the U, Michigan, UNC, WVU
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, wasn't it Steph who came into Invasion without any fanfare and received an offer on the spot? Everyone was hoping that the top 100 athlete from Georgia (Marquez Callaway?) would pop, but instead the staff targeted Steph.