FightingIrishLover7
All troll, no substance
- Messages
- 12,703
- Reaction score
- 7,514
I was thinking about ND's future after losing Michael Floyd...
I came up with the possibility that losing Michael could become a blessing in disguise down the road (probably most apparent in 2013).
Here's my analogy...
Michael Floyd = Luke Harangody
Let me explain, after Luke Harangody graduated... ND started playing at a higher level. But, why? Luke was a college superstar.. He could fill out the stat sheets on any given night. But alas, ND started to distribute the wealth. They played as a team, they learned to make the offense flow through all five players on the court, Luke no longer dictated the success of the offense.
Now, Michael Floyd has graduated.. Undoubtedly one of the greatest WRs in ND history. With that said, we are losing a huge piece to the offense. However, Michael dictated so much of our offensive success... The games were he struggled to get the ball, ND struggled to move the chains (ala the Pitt no-offense show).
I believe that down the road (2013 most likely) this offense, under the direction of a new QB and new OC, will become balanced... And thus for, ND's offense will finally hit that "Kelly Offense" level.
I know its a bold theory/analogy... But, I feel like ND is yet to experience Kelly's true offensive dominance.
What's your two cents?
I came up with the possibility that losing Michael could become a blessing in disguise down the road (probably most apparent in 2013).
Here's my analogy...
Michael Floyd = Luke Harangody
Let me explain, after Luke Harangody graduated... ND started playing at a higher level. But, why? Luke was a college superstar.. He could fill out the stat sheets on any given night. But alas, ND started to distribute the wealth. They played as a team, they learned to make the offense flow through all five players on the court, Luke no longer dictated the success of the offense.
Now, Michael Floyd has graduated.. Undoubtedly one of the greatest WRs in ND history. With that said, we are losing a huge piece to the offense. However, Michael dictated so much of our offensive success... The games were he struggled to get the ball, ND struggled to move the chains (ala the Pitt no-offense show).
I believe that down the road (2013 most likely) this offense, under the direction of a new QB and new OC, will become balanced... And thus for, ND's offense will finally hit that "Kelly Offense" level.
I know its a bold theory/analogy... But, I feel like ND is yet to experience Kelly's true offensive dominance.
What's your two cents?