drayer54
Well-known member
- Messages
- 8,405
- Reaction score
- 5,824
Remind me when they were speculating who Joe would pick, which men or white people were they throwing out?Okay, sure buddy.
Remind me when they were speculating who Joe would pick, which men or white people were they throwing out?Okay, sure buddy.
The VP pick is always a DEI pick. Biden was that for Obama, needed to make sure that the good ol'boys knew that a white guy was still near the controls.Remind me when they were speculating who Joe would pick, which men or white people were they throwing out?
You're mad she's a black woman in power. WE GET ITRemind me when they were speculating who Joe would pick, which men or white people were they throwing out?
You need to stop with that nonsense.You're mad she's a black woman in power. WE GET IT![]()
This is a safe enough space away from the public where a few just might admit they agree with my comment.You need to stop with that nonsense.
Seems Kamala has moved on from "What has been and what will be" to talking about her childhood and the struggles they faced everyday. Still can't give an answer to the tough questions.
Calling Harris a DEI hire doesn't mean someone dislikes her because she's a woman of color.This is a safe enough space away from the public where a few just might admit they agree with my comment.
Same.I'll take faux insurrection and mean tweets over WW3 all day everyday and twice on Sunday. I was a 100% SCOTUS voter in 2016, I am 100% anti-war in 2024. All the other crap is just noise.
Should be interesting to see how this is addressed in tonight's debate between the two weirdos.
Nothing to see at all… just the same people Toronto thinks needs a platform of free speech now bombing the hell out of one of our biggest allies.Same.
Now we got shit popping off in the Holy Land.
Oh come on, this is straight out of the Republican playbook. Hammer away at race and sex, wink wink, of course it's all well meaning and nothing worse!Calling Harris a DEI hire doesn't mean someone dislikes her because she's a woman of color.
You're too visible of a troll, you gotta dial it back.People can love/hate the Donald for his beliefs, character, etc. But at least there is a >0% that he will do some critical thinking and make a decision (good or bad).
What would you call someone who was selected for a job based on skin/sex?Oh come on, this is straight out of the Republican playbook. Hammer away at race and sex, wink wink, of course it's all well meaning and nothing worse!
It's why we'd had temper tantrums for a month in here because Harris hadn't "given an interview yet." Nothing she can say or do is going to convince the right wingers in here to vote for her, so why so upset?
It's because the interview is needed to start the GOP hate train on her, primarily as a 'dumb' woman. The interview came and went, the debate came and went, and uh oh Harris proved it's going to be a little harder than the right wingers thought to paint her that way.
Of course, that's ABC's fault.
I think some of you guys have some interesting opinions of your counterparts on the other side of the aisle. It comes across that some of you see us as these cruel racists or hatemongers when it couldn't be further from the truth. The media leaves a lasting impression.This is a safe enough space away from the public where a few just might admit they agree with my comment.
Your side made it more than clear that they chose her to be VP because of race & gender, instead of actual qualifications for the job. Now that we see how lacking in accomplishment and ability she is, you're mad that we're reminding you of that? How is it racist and sexist to simply point out what your side itself bragged about doing and claimed as a clear sign of their PC thinking agenda of hiring POC and women?You're mad she's a black woman in power. WE GET IT![]()
Lmao for a guy who loves hanging on my every word you have it completely wrong. I would love if they got nuked off of social media sites. But many here who are the classic "freedom speech" defenders would have a meltdown if Nazi's and terrorists got banned.Nothing to see at all… just the same people Toronto thinks needs a platform of free speech now bombing the hell out of one of our biggest allies.
Then we need to determine what a flag of genocide or hate is. I'm fine with stigmatizing folks, but absent some actual crime...let them do whatever.Lmao for a guy who loves hanging on my every word you have it completely wrong. I would love if they got nuked off of social media sites. But many here who are the classic "freedom speech" defenders would have a meltdown if Nazi's and terrorists got banned.
I've said it 100x anyone who flies a flag of genocide or hate should be arrested on the spot. But it's always interesting who gets squirmy at that idea.
But yeah I'm the terrorist sympathizer LOL.
If someone is walking down the street with a Nazi flag. Jail immediately.Then we need to determine what a flag of genocide or hate is. I'm fine with stigmatizing folks, but absent some actual crime...let them do whatever.
Just keep a very close eye on them as those sorts of loons do be violating laws quite often.
Nuked off the planet but given a platform to prove YOUR point. I think I understand you now. Thanks for clarifying. lol.Lmao for a guy who loves hanging on my every word you have it completely wrong. I would love if they got nuked off of social media sites. But many here who are the classic "freedom speech" defenders would have a meltdown if Nazi's and terrorists got banned.
I've said it 100x anyone who flies a flag of genocide or hate should be arrested on the spot. But it's always interesting who gets squirmy at that idea.
But yeah I'm the terrorist sympathizer LOL.
Right wingers need to paint the picture that she’s ONLY valued because of her sex or race. Everyone has been doing exactly this today in this thread, even telling us it’s the Dems that believe this! Wow!I think some of you guys have some interesting opinions of your counterparts on the other side of the aisle. It comes across that some of you see us as these cruel racists or hatemongers when it couldn't be further from the truth. The media leaves a lasting impression.
There's been a lot of talk about putting the first woman of color into the chair as if it's a qualification for the position. Gender, skin color, sexual orientation, religion, etc should never be the basis for selecting the leader of the free world. It really should come down to strength of leadership, policy, speaking ability, and other factors that will actually help one do the job at hand. It really should be the best person we have to offer, but sadly it's mostly snakes that get into politics. There will be a woman in the office one day, and hopefully she's there on her merits and ability and not because she checks a box.
Imagine a world where Harris is celebrated for being a woman of color and having accomplishments too!Your side made it more than clear that they chose her to be VP because of race & gender, instead of actual qualifications for the job. Now that we see how lacking in accomplishment and ability she is, you're mad that we're reminding you of that? How is it racist and sexist to simply point out what your side itself bragged about doing and claimed as a clear sign of their PC thinking agenda of hiring POC and women?
What? No I don't want terrorists to have a platform lmao. Why are you so confused lolNuked off the planet but given a platform to prove YOUR point. I think I understand you now. Thanks for clarifying. lol.
Right wingers need to paint the picture that she’s ONLY valued because of her sex or race. Everyone has been doing exactly this today in this thread, even telling us it’s the Dems that believe this! Wow!
That’s all bullshit, and the only result of discussions like this is to minimize the chances of a woman or someone of a different color being elected.
Because we’ve never had a black woman as President and that would be inspiring to millions of people? It’s 2024, are you serious?Why does it matter what gender or color the next President is? Will either affect performance? It should have zero bearing on the job, it shouldn't even be part of the discussion. Ability should be the only factor. Why can't she stand on that? She has history in politics.
I mean if Jack and BK had said in 2021 that they were only looking at hiring an African American at DC then I would have concerns with thatBecause we’ve never had a black woman as President and that would be inspiring to millions of people? It’s 2024, are you serious?
I want to see you guys saying all this about Marcus Freeman.
.....................................kinda zeroed in on him for HC...................I mean if Jack and BK had said in 2021 that they were only looking at hiring an African American at DC then I would have concerns with that
Nothing fake about it. Just like most of his campaign promises tho he let his faithful down and couldn't pull it offI'll take faux insurrection and mean tweets over WW3 all day everyday and twice on Sunday. I was a 100% SCOTUS voter in 2016, I am 100% anti-war in 2024. All the other crap is just noise.
Should be interesting to see how this is addressed in tonight's debate between the two weirdos.
It was refreshing that the ND hire discussion, at the time, had basically no racial references. A large majority of fans were behind Freeman getting the job and it had nothing to do with race......................................kinda zeroed in on him for HC...................![]()
Which is why DEI is so insidious. It makes minorities who climb the ladder to high positions have to always live with the perception that their own abilities alone are not what got them the job. Which is exactly what Clarence Thomas often speaks to in his opposition to Affirmative Action (besides his constitutional objections to the practice)It was refreshing that the ND hire discussion, at the time, had basically no racial references. A large majority of fans were behind Freeman getting the job and it had nothing to do with race.
You seem to be implying that race was a major factor.
It's very appealing to have a young, successful black coach. I love it. Many ND fans felt the same way. A majority of fans were behind him getting the job AND proud of his race (and fun mixed race family!) as well.It was refreshing that the ND hire discussion, at the time, had basically no racial references. A large majority of fans were behind Freeman getting the job and it had nothing to do with race.
You seem to be implying that race was a major factor.