College Athletics Branding - Name Image Likeness Rules

ND03

Value of ND degree may vary
Messages
135
Reaction score
130
Hard to read this as anything other than setting the terms upon which ND will drop major college football
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
I’m sure Freeman / the Players loved that article
This is exactly the issue. Every school recruiting against is can clip these interviews and articles and be like “ND doesn’t want you making money.” Just an incredibly myopic move by the admin.
 

MacIrish75

The New Logo is a Jinx
Messages
9,197
Reaction score
17,750
I’m not sure why they felt compelled to go on the record and put this out there. What could they possibly have hoped to gain from this?
 

NDPhilly

Philly Torqued
Messages
16,441
Reaction score
16,721
I don’t disagree with them at all, but they should be pr savvy enough to understand that the CFB journos who cover the sport roast anything that isn’t 100% all in for pay for play. WTF did they think a NY Times Op Ed would do? Did they think people would rally around this?
 

NDRock

Well-known member
Messages
7,489
Reaction score
5,448
I’m not sure why they felt compelled to go on the record and put this out there. What could they possibly have hoped to gain from this?
They’ve done it multiple times already. Just go the way of the Ivy League and be done with it. Would have more respect for them than the way they currently approach the program.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995

Baker is going to be much better than Emmert, and I actually think he's correct here. There needs to be federal regulation the same as there is federal regulation for thousands of other things (finance, cars, labor, foods, etc.)... this isn't complicated and, at its core, has nothing to do with "politicians".

Baker is also correct that the biggest issue right now is the lying and predatory "offers" some NIL groups are giving to kids as enticements. The Jaden Rashada thing was ridiculous.
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
Baker is going to be much better than Emmert, and I actually think he's correct here. There needs to be federal regulation the same as there is federal regulation for thousands of other things (finance, cars, labor, foods, etc.)... this isn't complicated and, at its core, has nothing to do with "politicians".

Baker is also correct that the biggest issue right now is the lying and predatory "offers" some NIL groups are giving to kids as enticements. The Jaden Rashada thing was ridiculous.
That is the way Swarbrick and Jenkins should have approached it. Hard to argue with that.
 

TheProspector

Well-known member
Messages
200
Reaction score
262
Baker is going to be much better than Emmert, and I actually think he's correct here. There needs to be federal regulation the same as there is federal regulation for thousands of other things (finance, cars, labor, foods, etc.)... this isn't complicated and, at its core, has nothing to do with "politicians".

Baker is also correct that the biggest issue right now is the lying and predatory "offers" some NIL groups are giving to kids as enticements. The Jaden Rashada thing was ridiculous.

Until the schools, presidents, and ADs start talking about collective bargaining, everything else is just window dressing.
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
Until the schools, presidents, and ADs start talking about collective bargaining, everything else is just window dressing.
It is unclear to me why the schools are so vehemently opposed to collective bargaining, beyond the usual reasons why companies don't like unions, I guess. Loss of control.

They act like it's impossible to consider, but there are lots of schools where grad student teaching assistants and the like are unionized. There are even a few schools where dorm RAs (undergrads) are unionized. A union for student-athletes doesn't seem like it would need to be all that different?

Agree on Baker, by the way. I live in Massachusetts and watched him for the last eight years. He's a very practical and pragmatic sort, basically a straight shooter, as politicians go. And really not a creature of Washington at all. I think he'll be good (whether anyone can actually fix college sports is a different question. But he's a good one to try.)
 

TheProspector

Well-known member
Messages
200
Reaction score
262
It is unclear to me why the schools are so vehemently opposed to collective bargaining, beyond the usual reasons why companies don't like unions, I guess. Loss of control.

They act like it's impossible to consider, but there are lots of schools where grad student teaching assistants and the like are unionized. There are even a few schools where dorm RAs (undergrads) are unionized. A union for student-athletes doesn't seem like it would need to be all that different?

Agree on Baker, by the way. I live in Massachusetts and watched him for the last eight years. He's a very practical and pragmatic sort, basically a straight shooter, as politicians go. And really not a creature of Washington at all. I think he'll be good (whether anyone can actually fix college sports is a different question. But he's a good one to try.)

I can tell you why they're opposed...money. It's a lot easier to run a business when you can pay your labor fixed, below market rates.
 

NDohio

Well-known member
Messages
5,869
Reaction score
3,060
It is unclear to me why the schools are so vehemently opposed to collective bargaining, beyond the usual reasons why companies don't like unions, I guess. Loss of control.

They act like it's impossible to consider, but there are lots of schools where grad student teaching assistants and the like are unionized. There are even a few schools where dorm RAs (undergrads) are unionized. A union for student-athletes doesn't seem like it would need to be all that different?

Agree on Baker, by the way. I live in Massachusetts and watched him for the last eight years. He's a very practical and pragmatic sort, basically a straight shooter, as politicians go. And really not a creature of Washington at all. I think he'll be good (whether anyone can actually fix college sports is a different question. But he's a good one to try.)
Jack Swarbrick was on the "College Football Enquirer" Podcast from last Thursday discussing his Op Ed. I just had time to listen to it and he does touch on this subject.
 

NDohio

Well-known member
Messages
5,869
Reaction score
3,060
If you have The Athletic, check out the article about U of Cinci and their new NIL deal with a local brewing company. With all of us Cincinnatians and our German heritage, this will do very well…
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,604
Reaction score
20,075
I mean this is truly absurd. Literally trying to legislate a competitive advantage... "hey it's illegal to take NIL benefits from an out-of-state school but if you want money now just sign with the University of Missouri."
Regardless, It’s still the University of Missouri. They need any advantage they can get.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995


A federal clearinghouse for NIL that authenticates deals would be a seismic shift in favor of Notre Dame relative to the current status quo… assuming that deals which are “booster collective gives cash straight to player” are prohibited.
 

Irish4life

Well-known member
Messages
2,887
Reaction score
3,674


A federal clearinghouse for NIL that authenticates deals would be a seismic shift in favor of Notre Dame relative to the current status quo… assuming that deals which are “booster collective gives cash straight to player” are prohibited.

Well, if bolded is made legal....what objections could there be on ND's part?
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,625
Reaction score
2,731
Pretty sure this is exactly what the founding fathers had in mind for our federal government. No surprise Lindsey Graham is leading the way on this essential expansion of government.
 
Top