What does it mean if I think that Big 12 football is an abomination before the Lord and the full house backfield gives me a semi?
Wasn't Army the end-all-be-all though?
I would probably pick Army over Navy if we're going that route.
Yep. Yale had more titles though. I said Navy and then looked it up.
Navy wasn't the power that Army was back when ND built its reputation upsetting some of those fabled Army teams. If you're talking blue bloods over the course of time, both Texas and Nebraska should be included well before Florida or Tennessee.
This is why the country hates ND fans... we're delusional at times. Sure, our schedule is filled with quality level names, but they're all playing like shit. Tell me, which of our wins has been noteworthy? Our current Power 5 victories are over teams (Texas, Virginia, GT, USC) with a combined 14-19 record. Then we've played two teams who, aside from their loss to us, are undefeated. However, they're in the AAC. Then there's 1-7 UMass from the MAC. At the start of the season, the schedule looked much more impressive.Holy fuck your posts in this thread are beyond redemption. It doesn't matter what our schedule "reads" like.
The objective facts are that it has been MUCH harder than what most teams have played to this point. If you can't Google this up from one of any dozen or so sources, you might be illiterate.
This is why the country hates ND fans... we're delusional at times. Sure, our schedule is filled with quality level names, but they're all playing like shit. Tell me, which of our wins has been noteworthy? Our current Power 5 victories are over teams (Texas, Virginia, GT, USC) with a combined 14-19 record. Then we've played two teams who, aside from their loss to us, are undefeated. However, they're in the AAC. Then there's 1-7 UMass from the MAC. At the start of the season, the schedule looked much more impressive.
This is why the country hates ND fans... we're delusional at times. Sure, our schedule is filled with quality level names, but they're all playing like shit. Tell me, which of our wins has been noteworthy? Our current Power 5 victories are over teams (Texas, Virginia, GT, USC) with a combined 14-19 record. Then we've played two teams who, aside from their loss to us, are undefeated. However, they're in the AAC. Then there's 1-7 UMass from the MAC. At the start of the season, the schedule looked much more impressive.
This is why the country hates ND fans... we're delusional at times. Sure, our schedule is filled with quality level names, but they're all playing like shit. Tell me, which of our wins has been noteworthy? Our current Power 5 victories are over teams (Texas, Virginia, GT, USC) with a combined 14-19 record. Then we've played two teams who, aside from their loss to us, are undefeated. However, they're in the AAC. Then there's 1-7 UMass from the MAC. At the start of the season, the schedule looked much more impressive.
How on earth is citing OBJECTIVE, UNBIASED SOS METRICS FROM MULTIPLE DIFFERENT SOURCES possibly classified as "delusional"?
You have literally no support for your position. None. There are zero facts to back up anything that you are saying. It does not fucking matter what you subjectively think about our schedule and the records of opponents that are on it. It rates where it does relative to other teams because it is stronger than what they have played.
Here we are, ranked #5 in the country, in the midst of an incredible season and largely in control of our own destiny... and yet we spend most of our time on IE arguing with other ND fans about whether Kelly is a good coach, and whether our resume sucks.
I think we beat any of them at 11-1 and I don't think it's close. But 12-0 is a definite possibility, which is why I'm rooting against Clemson. There's value in having a path to number 2 or 3 just in case one of our preferred scenarios to number 4 doesn't play out. Everyone is relying on the Big 12 to cannibalize, but if that doesn't happen we may be screwed. I think the "backup plan" is Clemson dropping and taking the ACC out of the playoff conversation all together.
...except Clemson. Their status as a team ranked ahead of us is more important than their status as a team we played hard in the rain on the road. Sacrificing the latter in order to eliminate the former is a trade I'd like to see happen. A lot of you guys are acting like losing by two to 11-1 Clemson in a hurricane somehow becomes a shitty loss in the eyes of the committee.
Just another day in paradise.
Interesting dialogue on the blue bloods topic...
just off the top of my head... hopefully I'm not forgetting anyone, I have them at:
Stone Cold locks:
ND, USC, Oklahoma, Bama, tOSU
Pretty Comfortable:
Texas, Michigan, Nebraska (current circumstance noted, they still belong imo)
Right on the border line:
LSU, A&M, Tennessee, Penn State
MAYBE a case can be made for:
Pitt, Michigan State, FSU, Florida, Georgia, UCLA
Same here, except I think it was the '90 season. Actually, that bowl game, so '89 season?I'm 35, I became a huge ND lifer in 89 and vividly remember those ND teams...
Incredible is a little strong.Here we are, ranked #5 in the country, in the midst of an incredible season and largely in control of our own destiny... and yet we spend most of our time on IE arguing with other ND fans about whether Kelly is a good coach, and whether our resume sucks.
lol there's no satisfying some people.Incredible is a little strong.
I wouldn't say Bama's pass defense is suspect this year. And LSU's passing offense seems to be improving, as Harris has had three very efficient performances in a row now. I would give the edge to Bama vs LSU's passing offense. I think that game comes down to whether Bama's offense show up or not.
Aside from Bama, who in the top 6 would you say has a harder schedule than ours?
Jeff Long just specifically said one of ND's biggest positives is the close loss to the #1 team. We need Clemson to win out. Accept it man.
Bama, LSU, and Florida are the only teams in the top 10 I would say have faced a tougher road to a high ranking than us so far
Let me ask everyone this question.
How many games do you think Bama, LSU, Florida, Ohio St., Baylor, TCU, and Clemson would lose if they played our schedule?
I would be shocked if any of them lost more than 2. I think the vast majority would lose 1.
I would HIGHLY argue Florida and LSU... in fact you can make the case that the only real, legit, tests either team has faced to this point (in typical SEC style) is each other and both have had multiple laughable level cup cake games... I wonder how much of either's image is propped up by those games...
For the record, I think LSU gets shit stomped this weekend...
The last three games have been against SC, FL and W Kentucky, not great teams by anyone's stretch of the imagination. And how much of that passing yardage was due to those three teams physical necessity to send the house very single play to slow down LSU's RB leaving the CBs completely on an island?