I don't buy it. Interesting theory, but it's still only a theory. No one knows what George was really going for except George himself. Certainly some of the shots are very similar to previous movies, but how much of that is simple coincidence? The comparisons to the beginning of Jedi and Phantom are very similar, but at the end of the day...it's still a damn ship docking with a larger ship. There's no big metaphor going on here, it's a basic sci-fi/space operation. There's definitely frequent call backs in the two trilogies...but if there weren't, then how would they be connected at all? They would be two separate stories all together.
While they're long as hell and obviously were meant more for entertainment value, there are a lot of valid points in the Red Letter Media reviews of the prequels. While the special effects were certainly top notch, they definitely took something away from the film with the constant use of green screen. The prequels just felt fake, the backgrounds made them look like a cartoon at times. In the original trilogy you don't get as much green screen, it's easier to imagine that the locations could actually exist in a galaxy far, far away as oppose to built on a computer and shot on green screen in England. In addition, the storylines in the prequels were awful at times and not well thought out (See the Red Letter Media reviews below), and some of the characters were really bad. The dialogue wasn't much better, the delivery was often very bland and felt forced. There were no Han Solos with witty dialogue and improvisation in this cast, they felt like they lacked passion.
As promised, part 1, but all parts of the Phantom Menace review should be watched:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FxKtZmQgxrI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I haven't read all of Klimo's thesis, just the first few pages, but in the Vice article he said:
"He was using Star Wars as a vehicle to kind of express larger themes and emotions." C'mon now. George isn't some savant that was trying to tell some masterful story between the prequels and the original trilogy. Maybe there was some of that in the original trilogy, but by the prequels they replaced great story and great acting/dialogue with boring plot and flashy effects. The prequels weren't a vehicle to express larger themes and emotions, they were a vehicle to make George lots of money, period. It's all about the ticket sales and merchandise. Yes, a lot of that money goes to the studio and to Kenner, but you get the idea. If Star Wars was George's masterpiece where this great, complex, artistic story was going on behind the scenes would he have ever sold the rights to Disney? No, I doubt it, he would have guarded that story from being damaged by someone who didn't share his vision.
At some point George lost his edge and may have lost some of his sanity. Just look at some of the moves and movies he made from the prequels and the later years. Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull had some boneheaded decisions in it too, and a lot of them came from Lucas, not Spielberg. That's a good review to watch too. It goes beyond those movies though, it's the additions and edits he made to the original trilogy that were lame and stupid. Making Greedo shoot first in the rerelease of the original trilogy in the 90s? Makes no sense. Replacing Sebastian Shaw with Hayden at the end of Return of the Jedi? Bullshit. Adding the "Noooooo!" to the Return of the Jedi scene where Vader throws the Emperor down the shaft? Are you fucking kidding me? It's a good thing George sold the rights, he may have found other ways to continue to screw with the franchise.