K
koonja
Guest
I know they're 0-2, but is Louisville real bad? Clemson so far looks quite a bit better than them. Clemson's D specifically looks good. Athletic.
This is their last game before ND, so Clemson is looking at a very BS Top-10 ranking for that game if they hold on. They don't look good at all.
This is their last game before ND, so Clemson is looking at a very BS Top-10 ranking for that game if they hold on. They don't look good at all.
What's so sad is that we had a manageable schedule this year. Tough, but manageable. Got GT and USC at home, and Clemson is shaky at a number of spots (but will still look like a good win). And if we got through all that, the back end wasn't bad at all.
We were primed for 11-1ish with 3-4 top 25 wins... and now we're down 4 starters by week 2. Just a shame.
Why are yoy speaking in the past tense? If I go game-by-game, I still see us with ten wins. Eight is possible, but so is twelve. I really don't see anything unwinnable even with the injuries.What's so sad is that we had a manageable schedule this year. Tough, but manageable. Got GT and USC at home, and Clemson is shaky at a number of spots (but will still look like a good win). And if we got through all that, the back end wasn't bad at all.
We were primed for 11-1ish with 3-4 top 25 wins... and now we're down 4 starters by week 2. Just a shame.
What's so sad is that we had a manageable schedule this year. Tough, but manageable. Got GT and USC at home, and Clemson is shaky at a number of spots (but will still look like a good win). And if we got through all that, the back end wasn't bad at all.
We were primed for 11-1ish with 3-4 top 25 wins... and now we're down 4 starters by week 2. Just a shame.
What's so sad is that we had a manageable schedule this year. Tough, but manageable. Got GT and USC at home, and Clemson is shaky at a number of spots (but will still look like a good win). And if we got through all that, the back end wasn't bad at all.
We were primed for 11-1ish with 3-4 top 25 wins... and now we're down 4 starters by week 2. Just a shame.
4 starters... yes. Major drop offs... not really. Gage isn't that much of a drop off from Jones. Prosise may not be a major drop off from Folston. Jones isn't that much of a drop off from Smyth. The only question mark (yes, a big one) is Zaire to Kizer. But we haven't really gotten to know how good MZ is. So we don't know how much the drop off is.
If the D can stay healthy, we're good.
Jarron Jones and Folsom will hurt us more than Malik IMO. We have one really good back right now. We should have had 2 really good backs, and Jones was our best DL IMO.
Re: Clemson-Louisville, is there something weird about the presentation audio or is that the dullest stadium in America?