'14 NJ OT Quenton Nelson (Notre Dame Signee)

NDdomer2

Local Sports vBookie
Messages
17,050
Reaction score
3,875
why are we ridiculing a guy for posting why HE thinks Q is better suited for OG. Hell we have people give worse opinions with nothing to back up there thinking, like myself.
 

EuropeanDomer

New member
Messages
931
Reaction score
32
Who cares how he grades out as a NFL prospect. If he can get the job done at 6'4 at ND for 4 years then that'd be nice.

Where i said something about NFL grades? I just put an example of the measures that a "modern OT" has. I do not care too about height, but he is +320lbs as a HS player, more than all of these examples being much shorter and younger. Maybe another example: Martin = 308 lbs. Watt = 321 (same than Nelson). He looks like he is on pace to 340 pounds if he wants.
 

STLDomer

Schmitty
Messages
9,426
Reaction score
549
Where i said something about NFL grades? I just put an example of the measures that a "modern OT" has. I do not care too about height, but he is +320lbs as a HS player, more than all of these examples being much shorter and younger. Maybe another example: Martin = 308 lbs. Watt = 321 (same than Nelson). He looks like he is on pace to 340 pounds if he wants.

You brought up guys that graded out well as NFL prospects. We just need him to be a good college player was my point.
 

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
Where i said something about NFL grades? I just put an example of the measures that a "modern OT" has. I do not care too about height, but he is +320lbs as a HS player, more than all of these examples being much shorter and younger. Maybe another example: Martin = 308 lbs. Watt = 321 (same than Nelson). He looks like he is on pace to 340 pounds if he wants.

You gave NFL tackle measurement averages as your mark for what a prototypical OT should look like.

Again, those "modern OT" measurements you used are of guys 4 years older than Nelson. They weren't all that size at Nelson's age either. So to use those numbers as a predictor of college football OT success may be misleading and certainly not accurate.
 

EuropeanDomer

New member
Messages
931
Reaction score
32
You brought up guys that graded out well as NFL prospects. We just need him to be a good college player was my point.

I do not want to be heavy (well i am, sorry) but Fisher, Lewan, Matthews or Zack Martin (elite College players) came from HS weighing around 280 pounds (some McGlinchey/Bivin-esque). Nelson is already 321 with "only" 6'4-5.. that's my point but i obviously really do not know if he is an OT or OG. Just an observation.
 

ResLife Hero

Well-known member
Messages
6,737
Reaction score
190
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>At left tackle, Quenton Nelson is athletic enough to get outside edge defenders to seal, but has power to move them as well.</p>— Irish Sports Daily (@ISDUpdate) <a href="https://twitter.com/ISDUpdate/statuses/418108322391142400">December 31, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I'm going to go with tackle on this one. He also pinned Kentavious Street to the ground.
 

OCIrish

Fukk Michigan
Messages
3,280
Reaction score
218
I'm going to throw just one more measurable into the equation......I've seen the height, and his weight as compared to "prototypical" OT 's......one thing to keep in mind......his wingspan is just insane!!!! We're talking damn near a 7' wingspan......throw height out the window, and probably his weight as well, once he gets his hands on you, in all likelihood, you're not going too far......but that's my .02$ worth.....
 

Irish Man3

Well-known member
Messages
6,582
Reaction score
949
why are we ridiculing a guy for posting why HE thinks Q is better suited for OG. Hell we have people give worse opinions with nothing to back up there thinking, like myself.

There's no ridicule, just dissgreement. Relax
 

Domina Nostra

Well-known member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
1,388
I was not ridiculing anyone, but I jumped on the arm length measurements because it is basically becoming a cliche that all of our OT prospects, no matter how highly rated, are always labeled as OGs.

To me, it's is basically a truism that anyone who is heavy enough to play guard projects better as a guard than a tackle in our system. Why? Because OGs can be a step slower. So unless the prospect is 6'6", somebody will always say they should be a OG. It's like clockwork.

Scouts do the same think with big DEs, like Tuitt. "He projects better as a OT." All they mean is that because the guy is fast enough to be a DE, he'd be a super-fast OT!

My guess is that he starts off at OG, like many of our OTs do. Not because he does not project as a great OT. But because our system seems to stick the most talented guys on the line as fast as possible, and then move them out later when the spot opens up or they beat the other guy out.
 
Last edited:

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,581
Reaction score
20,031
Size, there is very little difference in a guy 6'4" 325 and one 6'5" 315. IMO the only real difference in guys that play G vs T is their quickness to move laterally and backwards. That's why you see guys moved all over the line these days.
 

Domina Nostra

Well-known member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
1,388
Size, there is very little difference in a guy 6'4" 325 and one 6'5" 315. IMO the only real difference in guys that play G vs T is their quickness to move laterally and backwards. That's why you see guys moved all over the line these days.

Exactly. So declaring someone a OG is basically saying they don't have the mobility to play OT, at least in our system.
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
Size, there is very little difference in a guy 6'4" 325 and one 6'5" 315.

Yep. One of my biggest pet peeves in football is how people equate height, size, etc to essentially looking for that perfect rectangle. There are a million 6'6 315lb guys who can't do shit on the football field for a myriad of reasons.
 

Domina Nostra

Well-known member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
1,388
Now this is something I'm not worried about right now. Warinner took a bottom of the barrel OL and turned it into the best OL in the B1G in just 1 year.

He was the primary reason why we landed Decker in 2012.

The way I remember it, he grew up wanting to play for tOSU. He didn't get that offer immediately, and jumped on board with ND. When Warrnier left for OSU and OSU started recruiting him, it gave him the excuse he needed to flip.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,516
Reaction score
17,381
The way I remember it, he grew up wanting to play for tOSU. He didn't get that offer immediately, and jumped on board with ND. When Warrnier left for OSU and OSU started recruiting him, it gave him the excuse he needed to flip.

FYI, ant will never see this ;) I think he got enticed into a flame war and got banned. You're probably spot on though, for what it's worth.
 

EuropeanDomer

New member
Messages
931
Reaction score
32
How can a single guy have a top 247?! It is impossible to have a full and accurate evaluation of 247+ players.
 

Bubbles

Turn down your lights
Messages
661
Reaction score
76
How can a single guy have a top 247?! It is impossible to have a full and accurate evaluation of 247+ players.

Some say that he appears on high value stamps in Sweden, and that he can catch fish with his tongue. All we know is he’s called the Loy.
 
Messages
666
Reaction score
84
How can a single guy have a top 247?! It is impossible to have a full and accurate evaluation of 247+ players.

Some years, the difference between 27 and 143 on a prepared list is not that much, particularly if your recruit addresses a need. Granted the Jabrill Peppers and Leonard Fournette's do not come along often, but after the first fifteen, these lists of favorites are generally mix and match. I see no problem with Loy's choices. Again 73 on the list, or 202, you are getting a good football player.
 

Emcee77

latress on the men-jay
Messages
7,295
Reaction score
555
Yeah, and the individualized Top 247's are just for the reporters to have fun and play with a cool website feature. Loy invited debate on his rankings when he posted them or said something about how it should be fun to discuss. It's not meant to be authoritative or anything.
 

Ironman8

Jaqen H'ghar
Messages
11,652
Reaction score
902
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23NotreDame&src=hash">#NotreDame</a> HC Brian Kelly & OL coach Harry Hiestand will be at 2014 NJ OL commit Quenton Nelson's tonight for an in-home visit.</p>— Irish Sports Daily (@ISDUpdate) <a href="https://twitter.com/ISDUpdate/statuses/423822865486450688">January 16, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
G

GoIrish399

Guest
#29 in new Rivals 100
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Rivals100SneakPeek&src=hash">#Rivals100SneakPeek</a>
5-star OT Quenton Nelson (<a href="https://twitter.com/BigQ56">@BigQ56</a>)
NR: 29
PR: 21 (⬇️8)
<a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Rivals100&src=hash">#Rivals100</a> Rankings Release: MON, 12ET
<a href="http://t.co/B1Q0rkBk6Q">http://t.co/B1Q0rkBk6Q</a></p>— Rivals.com (@Rivals) <a href="https://twitter.com/Rivals/statuses/424604738278019076">January 18, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

CanadalovesND

Well-known member
Messages
6,525
Reaction score
5,946
So, he dropped down a few slots? Still a great rating, nonetheless.
 
Last edited:

Kaneyoufeelit

Bowl Eligible
Messages
4,440
Reaction score
635
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Nelson (No. 29) was consistently dominant throughout his senior yr, has great quickness, strength and technique - <a href="https://twitter.com/RivalsFriedman">@RivalsFriedman</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Rivals100&src=hash">#Rivals100</a></p>— Rivals.com (@Rivals) <a href="https://twitter.com/Rivals/statuses/424605996917325825">January 18, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Top