MIT Shooting

Walter White

New member
Messages
733
Reaction score
61
Heard on MSNBC that if they catch him and take him into custody, they can immediately question him without giving him any of the usual rights in the interest of national intelligence. No lawyer, no warnings on his rights as a citizen... I can dig it.

As much as it would be nice to do this, I can't dig it. It sets a terrible precedent.

Who gets to decide who's in the interest of national intelligence? It's too subjective and a very slippery slope.
 

Irish Insanity

Well-known member
Messages
9,885
Reaction score
584
Given how long it's taken to find him what do you guys think about either:

A. he was hit in the firefight last night and has possibly bled out in hiding and died

B. they are connected with a larger group that is aiding him in his escape/hiding

C. He's bobby trapping himself/others/his entire location to create a massive death toll of authorities when he's found.
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,127
Reaction score
11,072
As much as it would be nice to do this, I can't dig it. It sets a terrible precedent.

Who gets to decide who's in the interest of national intelligence? It's too subjective and a very slippery slope.

That's a good point, but in all honesty, the idea of "national security" has been on a slippery slope since 9/11. It was only a matter of time until something else happened, and more "security measures" are debated/instituted.

I agree with you that it could set a dangerous precedent... but the emotions after seeing what these two have done lead me to not really care what happens to this guy at the moment. Public execution for any residents of Boston that wish to attend was my first thought. I now think that would be dumb, but denying him the right to a lawyer? That's acceptable for a terrorist/mass-murderer, regardless of nationality, especially if he might have friends around.
 
Last edited:

irishpat183

Banned
Messages
5,625
Reaction score
504
Me too.

Or, somewhere along the way, some sick *** decided to help him and hide him. Maybe the kid said he wanted to turn himself in and asked the guy for help.

Which is point B. Especially when we've had some people get taken in due to alleged contact with the suspect.

Maybe he has a whole network that's aiding him?


And I doubt after doing what he's done, he's asking for "help". Don't try to humanize this monster.
 

AvesEvo

Well-known member
Messages
1,782
Reaction score
372
Heard on MSNBC that if they catch him and take him into custody, they can immediately question him without giving him any of the usual rights in the interest of national intelligence. No lawyer, no warnings on his rights as a citizen... I can dig it.

You dig it? If they can do that to him, they can do that to you.
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,127
Reaction score
11,072
You dig it? If they can do that to him, they can do that to you.

Well I don't plan on committing acts of terror or murder, so I don't think I'll be in a position to have my Miranda rights denied in the interest of national security any time soon.
 

WakeUpEchoes

New member
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
101
Which is point B. Especially when we've had some people get taken in due to alleged contact with the suspect.

Maybe he has a whole network that's aiding him?


And I doubt after doing what he's done, he's asking for "help". Don't try to humanize this monster.

LOL. I was just saying that along the way, he broke into someone's house, and for some reason told them he wanted to turn himself in, so some moron is hiding him there until he does so. Not likely, I agree. And I also agree there is a possibility of other suspects who are connected to all of this helping him hide.

No one his humanizing anyone.
 

Zwidmanio

Active member
Messages
203
Reaction score
42
That's a good point, but in all honesty, the idea of "national security" has been on a slippery slope since 9/11. It was only a matter of time until something else happened, and more "security measures" are debated/instituted.

I agree with you that it could set a dangerous precedent... but the emotions after seeing what these two have done lead me to not really care what happens to this guy at the moment. Public execution for any residents of Boston that wish to attend was my first thought. I now think that would be dumb, but denying him the right to a lawyer? That's acceptable for a terrorist/mass-murderer, regardless of nationality, especially if he might have friends around.

I have to agree with Walter. As much as I really don't care what happens to a cold-blooded killer, I'd still prefer that citizens are afforded due process no matter the circumstances. It's easy to dismiss rapists, killers, pedophiles, etc., but part of the reason we love this country and want it protected from these nutjobs is because of our rights given to us under the constitution. Once we start throwing those rights away what do we have left? Security? Or perhaps a false sense of security...
 

Rhode Irish

Semi-retired
Messages
7,057
Reaction score
900
So I guess that cop outside MIT isn't a human being?

What? Do you even read and/or try to understand what people are saying or are you just looking for ways to say stupid things? What happened to the MIT officer is tragic and he is a hero. But that doesn't have anything to do with what I said or the point I was making. They hid for three days, and if they were just out to kill as many people as they could they would have been out killing people until they were killed or ran out of weaponry during that time. The point is that it seems like they had a plan and an agenda. Why do you find that to be such an offensive idea?

None of this even matters, though. Who cares what they were thinking? Doesn't make them any less sick or depraved. But the point came up so I'm just responding to it. Stop trying to twist my words around to make it seem like I'm a sympathizer or I don't care about the victims. I live here. The victims are my people and there is nothing in the world that I want more than for this sick **** to be found and get what is coming to him. You're sole concern here seems to be the racial and political backgrounds of these terrorists, and you seem willing to only consider information or perspective that supports what you want the answers to be. A lot of the things you've said here are incredibly stupid, and people disagreeing with you doesn't make them on the terrorists' side.
 

clashmore_mike

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
9,724
Reaction score
2,401
iWNCz5UYNtz2z.gif
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,127
Reaction score
11,072
I have to agree with Walter. As much as I really don't care what happens to a cold-blooded killer, I'd still prefer that citizens are afforded due process no matter the circumstances. It's easy to dismiss rapists, killers, pedophiles, etc., but part of the reason we love this country and want it protected from these nutjobs is because of our rights given to us under the constitution. Once we start throwing those rights away what do we have left? Security? Or perhaps a false sense of security...

That's the problem... how far are we willing to go to be "safe?" I understand your point, and ultimately you and Walter are right.

I just think "due process" ran it's course for this gentleman when he started throwing grenades/bombs at police.
 

irishpat183

Banned
Messages
5,625
Reaction score
504
What? Do you even read and/or try to understand what people are saying or are you just looking for ways to say stupid things? What happened to the MIT officer is tragic and he is a hero. But that doesn't have anything to do with what I said or the point I was making. They hid for three days, and if they were just out to kill as many people as they could they would have been out killing people until they were killed or ran out of weaponry during that time. The point is that it seems like they had a plan and an agenda. Why do you find that to be such an offensive idea?

None of this even matters, though. Who cares what they were thinking? Doesn't make them any less sick or depraved. But the point came up so I'm just responding to it. Stop trying to twist my words around to make it seem like I'm a sympathizer or I don't care about the victims. I live here. The victims are my people and there is nothing in the world that I want more than for this sick **** to be found and get what is coming to him. You're sole concern here seems to be the racial and political backgrounds of these terrorists, and you seem willing to only consider information or perspective that supports what you want the answers to be. A lot of the things you've said here are incredibly stupid, and people disagreeing with you doesn't make them on the terrorists' side.

You kept leaving out the cop in your rant about how they "could've killed more people"...Kept going with the 3 people...they killed 4.

You make yourself seem like a sympathizer. But if you say you're not, I believe you. I won't argue.

And I'm calling it like I see it. It's you and a few others that want this, with every fiber of your being, to just be a white guy from America.

Well it wasn't. So now people, including yourself, went on the campaign to hopefully dig up something to grasp onto (well they ARRREEEE citizens, he looks like a"white" guy)...in the meantime, anyone that mentions foreign terrorist, is a "racist" and only concerned with race. Ignoring the fact that it's much more likely that guys with foreign names and connections, with slightly darker skin and features, that just got done blowing up innocent people, are radicals that hate America.

We have different ways of thinking. I'd rather assume that he's not an american, and an enemy of the state from the get go, giving my country the benefit of the doubt. Then, if he's proven to be some crazy, redneck in a cabin somewhere? I'll be the first to chastize him.
 

IrishJayhawk

Rock Chalk
Messages
7,181
Reaction score
464
You kept leaving out the cop in your rant about how they "could've killed more people"...Kept going with the 3 people...they killed 4.

You make yourself seem like a sympathizer. But if you say you're not, I believe you. I won't argue.

And I'm calling it like I see it. It's you and a few others that want this, with every fiber of your being, to just be a white guy from America.

Well it wasn't. So now people, including yourself, went on the campaign to hopefully dig up something to grasp onto (well they ARRREEEE citizens, he looks like a"white" guy)...in the meantime, anyone that mentions foreign terrorist, is a "racist" and only concerned with race. Ignoring the fact that it's much more likely that guys with foreign names and connections, with slightly darker skin and features, that just got done blowing up innocent people, are radicals that hate America.

We have different ways of thinking. I'd rather assume that he's not an american, and an enemy of the state from the get go, giving my country the benefit of the doubt. Then, if he's proven to be some crazy, redneck in a cabin somewhere? I'll be the first to chastize him.

It also wan't the "dark skinned male" that you were convinced it to be.
 
Top