I think we're on the same page here. So why does an unsigned recruit having some small measure of leverage prior to signing his LOI (and losing all of it) make it OK for Kiffin to pull an accepted offer in favor of a higher ranked prospect? I understand it's legal, but it's also clearly unethical; you seem to disagree with the latter assertion, or I'm misunderstanding you.
In my mind it is unethical, but NCAA football is a big business and as we all know (most)business is
amoral,. The NCAA has an established "rule book- established code of ethics" with "regulators to monitor actions of those taking part of the NCAA"..... and I guess what I am getting at is this:
To the extreme, look at what the #1 recruit is doing to Clemson. He is using his personal recruiting "leverage" to get a scholarship for his buddy whose otherwise best offer is to Ole Miss, where the #1 recruits brother already plays. He is leveraging Clemson by saying get this guy a scholarship and I am done, no more talking to any schools.....That is a lot of leverage for one person. Dabo Swinney is in a precarious position and it is public info this is going on. All the talk radio down here where I live is "lets see if Dabo has any balls" and "if Dabo let's this kid get away he should demoted to waterboy"..."SoCar got a #1 recruit, Clemson better get this one...etc." Believe me it is a big deal here in SC and Dabo is feeling the public pressure to get this kid. How does he do it? We will see.....
In general all of these guys tend to play this amoral game at some level to get the best opportunity for themselves, because in the end, some will go onto NFL, some will get hurt, some will transfer away, some are just damn glad to be there on a full ride, and some will try hard to get a valuable degree. A student-athlete may have his dream school, but that does not mean he will not be able to leverage a bettter position at another school, say with more playing time, or a better depth chart, or a better educational opportunity, should he have an injury that no one knows about..... I have always wondered what could have made Greenberry drop us on NSD for Houston.... not that I am upset about it, but what did the Houston coach promise, and what did Greenberry tell ND to convince them he was Irish up until NSD.... ? who knows....?
My main point is that the kids play the game (to some extent) just like the schools do. I know we like to gleam the possibility that we know whats going on from the recruitniks and Wiltfong's of the world but we really don't know but what is given to us and then we speculate or assert.
And I agree with LA that there are no indications Kiffin considereds Hawkins anything but part of the team. Hawkins on the otherhand may be looking at all of the DBs coming in and may feel he may not ever see the field. So he could leverage himself at another school in some manner just by taking visits and seing what other schools are willing to "offer" him because he is already a USC commit, but with the knowledge, that the rug could be pulled out from under him. USCs roster is full of just as equally talented Dbs from the incoming class, to those in the last two classes...
but I would gladly take Hawkins at ND this year and I am sure Kelly would too. Its just the position we need most and I have always seen him as a possible flip (total speculation on my part). Whats to say Hawkins doesnt come in to ND and say "I'm going to give the Irish a much harder look now."?
Anyway, I just dont think it is
all the schools fault, and I am certainly not going to blame them for playing the game as the rules are set, just as in any business. Though I do think the kids are not always aware of what they are getting themselves into with some schools and should beware.... because once you have signed that LOI, you are said property of school for at least 1-year.
I apologize for the long post.
If this topic belongs in its own thread, so be it. I just felt I needed to clarify my earlier posts......
