I think ND wins by 6, and it comes down to the last drive for the win (either O score, or D stand).
Predicting DK makes some mistakes, but our TEs have a good game along with lots of running. I think our OL dominates, but their DEs get some shots on our QB. BW runs two TDs in RZ packages. Our D must take advantage of their OL woes and get pressure on Watson if we are to win. Predicting 1 or 2 Watson INTs. Coming out party for KVR.
I think we win by 18+ or lose in a smoking crater.
18.5? -25?
I really don't see how folks can predict a close game. Athletes on one side are going to dominate the other.
It's not going to be close.
Has it been confirmed where Gameday will be? SIAP.
I can see us struggling to move the ball if Kizer doesn't improve, but also can see our defense doing well against this team.
This will be a really good warm up for USC. Clemson, like USC, has a very athletic defense, but potentially we maybe able to run well on both. Offense is loaded with skill players, just like USC. Nice thing about USC is they don't have a dual threat QB, so if we play well against this Clemson team, I'm going to feel pretty good about USC.
Everyone says they aren't sure about ND especially after Texas, Virginia and now GT eat total ass and UMass was expected.
Clemson lost something like 7 of their top 8 tacklers from their defense last year. They also blew out AppSt and Wofford but squeaked by Louisville.
When ND beats Clemson, and handily, everyone will then say that Clemson is over rated etc etc and ND will have to beat USC to prove its playoff ready.
If it comes down to who can control the line of scrimmage when ND has the ball then I really I like ND's chances,... turnovers and what happens on that same line when Clemson has the ball will play just as big of role though imo...