irishfan
Irish Hoops Mod
- Messages
- 7,205
- Reaction score
- 607
Only had like 20 mins to throw this together but you get the idea lol
![]()
haha this is hilarious. well done.
Only had like 20 mins to throw this together but you get the idea lol
![]()
I don't know much, but I do know I was told that it was never in the plans for last year.
Only had like 20 mins to throw this together but you get the idea lol
![]()
That looks purple at first, but the more I look at it, the more I see blue. Honestly, I would love for them to get turf and make some designs. Screw the old traditionals who want nothing but the lines. I want a ND logo in the middle of the field and lettering in the "golden" endzones.
They wanted the field to match Brian Kelly's face.That looks purple at first, but the more I look at it, the more I see blue.
I wouldn't mind having the Notre Dame logo at the 50 yard line but nothing more than that
Have you guys ever played a contact sport on turf?
It is not a good idea.
Nobody has ever won a game because they have a turf field. But the amount of injuries and the other issues that are caused by turf make it not even worth the switch.
BAD MOVE!
Another person perpetuating a myth. Studies have shown LOWER injury rates on artificial turf.
BS. The question was have you ever played a contact sport on artificial turf?
People need to quit crying about the field they are playing on. Both teams have to deal with it.
So why not play on a better surface that doesn't cost tons of money to maintain and never looks ******?
We could all play on dirt, hell we could play on gravel and it wouldn't give an advantage either way.
Not only does the surface we play on look and perform terribly, maybe it is just me, but I always feel like ND just looks faster when we play on turf. I don't have any stats or anything to back me up, and maybe it's just that we underperform at home and it has nothing to do with the surface, but I just feel like we look faster and better on turf.
Could be that all of our home games are broadcast on NBC.
Tom Hammond. All makes sense now.
Have you guys ever played a contact sport on turf?
It is not a good idea.
Nobody has ever won a game because they have a turf field. But the amount of injuries and the other issues that are caused by turf make it not even worth the switch.
BAD MOVE!
So why not play on a better surface that doesn't cost tons of money to maintain and never looks ******?
We could all play on dirt, hell we could play on gravel and it wouldn't give an advantage either way.
And that's exactly my point it doesn't matter what we play on. Go back 10 years to every team that has won the Championship game. How many of those teams play on a artificial home field.
If your only argument for change is that it "looks better" that is ridiculous.
And that's exactly my point it doesn't matter what we play on. Go back 10 years to every team that has won the Championship game. How many of those teams play on a artificial home field.
If your only argument for change is that it "looks better" that is ridiculous.
So why not play on a better surface that doesn't cost tons of money to maintain and never looks ******?
We could all play on dirt, hell we could play on gravel and it wouldn't give an advantage either way.
I have. Played college football on astro turf at Wittenberg in Springfield, OH twice and grassy turf at Kenyon College in Gambier, OH twice. Also played football at the RCA/Hoosier Dome when it was basically a grassy astro turf.
Astro turf, yes. Terrible idea. Hard, unforgiving, and scraps your skin off. Also causes nagging injuries like shin splints, knee pain, turf toes, and higher rates of serious injuries from your feet 'getting caught' on the surface.
Grassy turf is a great idea. It's like real grass with small black rubber pellets. Otherwise it's pretty much amazing. My college team went to grassy turf and I wish they had had it when I was in school. The grass we had was always in rough condition as the season wore on (school is in Indiana).
So in my opinion, one that has actual experience dealing with multiple playing surfaces, I think the grassy turf option is much better for an Indiana football field that will be utilized past the month of October.
Ive also played on multiple surfaces (including grassy turf) and natural IMHO is a lot better to play on.
I find it hard to believe that after all the years ND has been playing at the top of college football. An artificial field will solve anything.
Those black balls suck when they get in your eyes. When you do get tackled and the ground is hotter than the ambient air temp by 40 degrees than tell me how fatigue will not play a factor in the game. Also, playing on a frozen rubber field sucks worse than playing on a natural field that has natural grass.
I know people think being tackled on a rubber field would hurt less. Nothing is further than the truth. I always thought the natural ground was better at taking impact. After every game ive played on artificial turf I had turf hangover. Basically a headache from the pounding on the ground. Not to mention more dehydrated from the heat of the field.
As I said. Speaking from experience its a bad move.