Tommy Rees - Offensive Coordinator

FightingIrishLover7

All troll, no substance
Messages
12,703
Reaction score
7,516
tired: Kelly had shackles on Rees
wired: Freeman has shackles on Rees.


But with all do seriousness, I know Freeman wanted to overpower them. I wonder if that was mutual decision by Tommy or Freeman's call...
 

NDRock

Well-known member
Messages
7,489
Reaction score
5,448
Maybe they value people who used to play for ND?
That’s fine. The part where you make a HC hiring based on a coordinator is nuts. Rees could leave this off-season and then you’re “stuck” with a guy you would have never hired in the 1st place. I’m glad they went with Freeman just seems crazy they would have gone a different direction based on an OC.
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
That’s fine. The part where you make a HC hiring based on a coordinator is nuts. Rees could leave this off-season and then you’re “stuck” with a guy you would have never hired in the 1st place. I’m glad they went with Freeman just seems crazy they would have gone a different direction based on an OC.
Jack wanted to hire Freeman. Others needed to be persuaded.

The way to persuade them was “continuity.” (Which worked well for Ohio State, Oklahoma, etc). Continuity meant Rees (and Balis).

Rees had a big offer on the table from LSU. We had to move quickly to keep him. Hence hiring your OC before your head coach. But I would strongly assume Freeman was on board with all of this.

Without Rees maybe the Freeman plan falls apart, you re-set and search more broadly. But that’s different than saying Freeman would never have been hired in the first place. He was always Swarbrick’s first choice. Rees is just how Swarbrick closed the deal.

At least that’s how I interpret LAX’s post and the chain of events at the time.
 

NDRock

Well-known member
Messages
7,489
Reaction score
5,448
Jack wanted to hire Freeman. Others needed to be persuaded.

The way to persuade them was “continuity.” (Which worked well for Ohio State, Oklahoma, etc). Continuity meant Rees (and Balis).

Rees had a big offer on the table from LSU. We had to move quickly to keep him. Hence hiring your OC before your head coach. But I would strongly assume Freeman was on board with all of this.

Without Rees maybe the Freeman plan falls apart, you re-set and search more broadly. But that’s different than saying Freeman would never have been hired in the first place. He was always Swarbrick’s first choice. Rees is just how Swarbrick closed the deal.

At least that’s how I interpret LAX’s post and the chain of events at the time.
That’s literally what Lax wrote
Even more than that, Freeman would NOT have been hired if Rees had left...
 

IRISHDODGER

Blue Chip Recruit
Messages
8,044
Reaction score
6,110
This is what I'm wondering. All will be well when we play inferior opponents but come big game time. We will be where we always have offensively. I hope Tommy figures it out but I won't put stock in it.
Inferior to OSU? That’s most of the FBS.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,110
Reaction score
27,369
So does @arahop and everyone else that seems to think it’s mainly a Rees play calling issue, am I correct to assume you think we win with the exact same players and just different play calls?
 

IRISHDODGER

Blue Chip Recruit
Messages
8,044
Reaction score
6,110
So does @arahop and everyone else that seems to think it’s mainly a Rees play calling issue, am I correct to assume you think we win with the exact same players and just different play calls?
Here’s what vibes I got from some posters after one game:

Rees is horrible & needs to be replaced
OL is horrible & the underclassmen need to start
Hiestand is overrated & is responsible for whatever was bad about Saturday’s OL performance
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,104
Reaction score
12,943
So does @arahop and everyone else that seems to think it’s mainly a Rees play calling issue, am I correct to assume you think we win with the exact same players and just different play calls?
Idk if we would win but I think schematically Rees got his lunch money stolen. He called a boring predictable easy to defend game, and didn’t adapt to the obvious problems the offense was having.

OSU has a good defense but we made them look like 2021 Georgia. I’ll go out on a limb and say 10 points will be the lowest total OSU will hold a P5 opponent to. Many of whom will have vastly inferior talent to ND. Criticizing our lack of weapons just seems so lazy when you can look around at teams that don’t recruit at a top 10 level, like ND, having much more success.
 

Rockin’Irish

Hearing Impaired
Messages
3,244
Reaction score
2,507
Here’s what vibes I got from some posters after one game:

Rees is horrible & needs to be replaced
OL is horrible & the underclassmen need to start
Hiestand is overrated & is responsible for whatever was bad about Saturday’s OL performance
Yes indeed, lots of overreactions based on a small sample size. I think it’s fair to watch the next few games to see how the team’s play progresses. If we don’t see reasonable progress then I think it will be much easier to offer criticisms. We’ve had a significant staff turnover and quite a few players, on offense especially, with minimal playing experience playing together.
 

irishnd31

Biggest Idiot On This Site
Messages
6,208
Reaction score
8,088
Here’s what vibes I got from some posters after one game:

Rees is horrible & needs to be replaced
OL is horrible & the underclassmen need to start
Hiestand is overrated & is responsible for whatever was bad about Saturday’s OL performance
Imagine if we had lost by more than 11..... this would really be a poo show.
 

arahop

Well-known member
Messages
1,601
Reaction score
615
So does @arahop and everyone else that seems to think it’s mainly a Rees play calling issue, am I correct to assume you think we win with the exact same players and just different play calls?
It's a combination of players and shit play calling. Matt Salerno running around against the #2 team tells us we need some players. Luckily they have some WRs for 2023. Tyree and Diggs we're not effective and stuffed. Player issue.
Tommy is Tommy.
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
Idk if we would win but I think schematically Rees got his lunch money stolen. He called a boring predictable easy to defend game, and didn’t adapt to the obvious problems the offense was having.

OSU has a good defense but we made them look like 2021 Georgia. I’ll go out on a limb and say 10 points will be the lowest total OSU will hold a P5 opponent to. Many of whom will have vastly inferior talent to ND. Criticizing our lack of weapons just seems so lazy when you can look around at teams that don’t recruit at a top 10 level, like ND, having much more success.
You can't "gameplan" around your C and RG being turnstiles against a defense as talented as OSU. We probably could have gotten better yardage with more screens and sweeps in the 2nd half, but putting this primarily on Rees feels like criticizing the arrangement of the deck chairs on the Titanic. Once it became apparent we couldn't win the LOS without Patterson, none of the other shit really mattered.
 

arahop

Well-known member
Messages
1,601
Reaction score
615
It's a combination of players and shit play calling. Matt Salerno running around against the #2 team tells us we need some players. Luckily they have some WRs for 2023. Tyree and Diggs we're not effective and stuffed. Player issue.
Tommy is Tommy.
Yes Tyree And Diggs will be good against the teams that we out man. But they aren't going to beat the OSUs, Bama's, Georgia's. Making play calling all that more important. We need a Chuck Weis " Schematic Advantage" I'm not ready to fire Tommy but he needs to prove his worth. Let's revisit the next big game or the next time our offense pulls a no show. The defense is there at championship level. Our offense is bottom 3rd. We can't pretend our Oline is a strength bc the numbers from last year and this game show otherwise
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,110
Reaction score
27,369
It's a combination of players and shit play calling. Matt Salerno running around against the #2 team tells us we need some players. Luckily they have some WRs for 2023. Tyree and Diggs we're not effective and stuffed. Player issue.
Tommy is Tommy.

First give, up the Salerno crap the dude ran two routes all game and one was an explosive pass. You’re being intentionally hyperbolic.

So I’ve seen a ton of complaints about play calling but now when pressed it seems like it’s mainly a player issue, which others have pointed out most of the players everyone likes, Rees recruited? Doesn’t make sense.
 

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,483
Reaction score
14,204
It is ass-backwards but basically Kelly forced their hand. He was offering Rees a big coordinator contract to come with him to LSU. Rees was like "I have to take this unless I know I have a job here." Jack zero'd in on promoting Freeman for a lot of reasons but not everyone was sold on that, some of the decision makers wanted a national search. Part of selling that was "continuity" which included retaining Tommy. So it was chicken-vs-egg thing. From a logistical standpoint, it was way easier to "lock in" Tommy in his current role with an improved contract and assurances from Tommy that he was willing to work with Freeman and Freeman was willing to work with Tommy --> and then iron out a HC contract for Freeman.

Btw -- the national search never would've gotten past Fickell and Campbell. One of them would've been the hire, depending on how long ND was willing to wait.
I think keeping Tommy was important and I don't think he's the imbecile all the online Bill Walshs are making him out to be.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,110
Reaction score
27,369
Idk if we would win but I think schematically Rees got his lunch money stolen. He called a boring predictable easy to defend game, and didn’t adapt to the obvious problems the offense was having.

OSU has a good defense but we made them look like 2021 Georgia. I’ll go out on a limb and say 10 points will be the lowest total OSU will hold a P5 opponent to. Many of whom will have vastly inferior talent to ND. Criticizing our lack of weapons just seems so lazy when you can look around at teams that don’t recruit at a top 10 level, like ND, having much more success.

I think Rees could, should, have done better. So I do think play calling was a issue, just not nearly to the degree as others. In the aftermath I said every single offensive member needs to be better. I just don’t think play calling was even a Top 5 suspect of our woes and most of the complaints when pressed seem to have more issue with execution and/or one off plays rather than play calling as a whole being an issue (ex Coombs at OSU last year).

Not the above, but it just seems some are stuck in a line of thinking of blame Rees first, figure out why we’re blaming Rees second.

If anything, my main issue with Rees from Saturday is could Buchner been better prepared in his protection identification. Buchner took the blame their post game. Could be just a product of first start being at OSU but that was our biggest issue IMO.
 

arahop

Well-known member
Messages
1,601
Reaction score
615
First give, up the Salerno crap the dude ran two routes all game and one was an explosive pass. You’re being intentionally hyperbolic.

So I’ve seen a ton of complaints about play calling but now when pressed it seems like it’s mainly a player issue, which others have pointed out most of the players everyone likes, Rees recruited? Doesn’t make sense.
That was to make my point that we are lacking WR depth right now, is that even arguable Dale? Show me where our offense has been explosive or a top 20 offense with data. Show me where our passing offense has been elite. It's not hyperbole it's stat driven.
 

NDdomer2

Local Sports vBookie
Messages
17,050
Reaction score
3,875
You can't "gameplan" around your C and RG being turnstiles against a defense as talented as OSU. We probably could have gotten better yardage with more screens and sweeps in the 2nd half, but putting this primarily on Rees feels like criticizing the arrangement of the deck chairs on the Titanic. Once it became apparent we couldn't win the LOS without Patterson, none of the other shit really mattered.
not to mention you cant suddenly have some brand new game plan that you would honestly expect to work after drilling the failing game plan in practice for weeks.

going to something that WASNT practiced/installed seems like a recipe for further to catastrophic failure, not some resurrected success.
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
That was to make my point that we are lacking WR depth right now, is that even arguable Dale?
No one has said otherwise. You're not arguing in good faith.
Show me where our offense has been explosive or a top 20 offense with data.
Our offense doesn't play other offenses. Assuming you meant "top 20 defense"...
Show me where our passing offense has been elite. It's not hyperbole it's stat driven.
Rees called a great game against Clemson in 2020, which was a victory full of explosive offensive plays over the 3rd best defense in the nation

And he did more than enough to win the game against Okie State for us with a mash unit at OL and a statue at QB. We had a three possession lead against the 2nd best defense in the nation with about a minute left in the first half. Too bad Elston shit the bed and gave the game away.
 

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,265
Reaction score
2,489
You can't "gameplan" around your C and RG being turnstiles against a defense as talented as OSU. We probably could have gotten better yardage with more screens and sweeps in the 2nd half, but putting this primarily on Rees feels like criticizing the arrangement of the deck chairs on the Titanic. Once it became apparent we couldn't win the LOS without Patterson, none of the other shit really mattered.
I think the fact the C and RG were so bad provides the precise reasoning for attempting something different in the second half when it was clear that their original game plan was failing and they were playing from behind. I truly believe that OSU's defensive line and overall defense was much more improved than most expected. But doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results? Foolish, to me.

I'm not on the extreme side of this debate like some, but I did find it very demoralizing watching the team lose their lead, realize the offense had no shot, and then essentially pack in it in hopes of not getting blown out. I'm not saying that's what they did. I'm saying, as a fan, that's how I felt watching the end of the game. I kept looking for Styles and Tyree only to be met with QB draws and Salearno. It was disappointing. I'd rather have lost by 18 with ND throwing the kitchen sink at OSU than by 11 with them holding on for dear life.

I think what's fueling this fire so much is this loss comes on the heals of losing the fiesta bowl when the offense went dry in the second half and the defense couldn't catch a breather. I had a very similar vibe in this game even though the first half scoring was wildly different, the execution of the game plan was spectacular...only to dry up in the second half with what seemed like little to no effort to adjust. Regardless of reasoning (play-calling, execution, depth issues, etc)....which is probably all of the above. Shades of grey as with everything in life.

I try not to armchair QB. I realize it's annoying and quite frankly, I don't know enough about the X's and O's to warrant any strong opinions that should be taken seriously. But as fans, we're supposed to be emotional, irrational, and in the moment. I think that's what is on display. People want to win, they saw we were winning, and then it slips through your fingers again, and again. It's tough to swallow and whether objectively warranted or not, fingers are going to be pointed.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,110
Reaction score
27,369
That was to make my point that we are lacking WR depth right now, is that even arguable Dale? Show me where our offense has been explosive or a top 20 offense with data. Show me where our passing offense has been elite. It's not hyperbole it's stat driven.

By data I pulled end of last year, we were 21st in P5 in Pass Explosiveness during the regular season according to CFBData.

We were 20th in Success Rate (again P5, CFBData, regular season).

The only other P5 teams that ranked above us in both were Wake Forest, Georgia and Alabama.

ND was actually extremely explosive when we got passes off last year. The main problem was getting them off. We were outside the Top 110 nationally in Havoc Allowed.
 
Last edited:

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
I think the fact the C and RG were so bad provides the precise reasoning for attempting something different in the second half when it was clear that their original game plan was failing and they were playing from behind. I truly believe that OSU's defensive line and overall defense was much more improved than most expected. But doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results? Foolish, to me.
OSU didn't retake the lead until the final seconds of the 3rd quarter. Changing the game plan before then would have been very risky, and even in the 4th quarter, we had very few options with Patterson out and our lack of depth at the skill positions.
I'm not on the extreme side of this debate like some, but I did find it very demoralizing watching the team lose their lead, realize the offense had no shot, and then essentially pack in it in hopes of not getting blown out. I'm not saying that's what they did. I'm saying, as a fan, that's how I felt watching the end of the game. I kept looking for Styles and Tyree only to be met with QB draws and Salearno. It was disappointing. I'd rather have lost by 18 with ND throwing the kitchen sink at OSU than by 11 with them holding on for dear life.
The demoralizing thing for me was watching our OL get whipped. OL and TE is where we're supposed to be able to go blow-for-blow with the Big Three. If we don't even have that, then Freeman's rebuild is going to take longer than I expected. There was a lot of talk about how Kelly left the cupboards well-stocked, which is true compared to what he inherited, but Alexander and Quinn created some serious holes that are going to take time to fill.
I think what's fueling this fire so much is this loss comes on the heals of losing the fiesta bowl when the offense went dry in the second half and the defense couldn't catch a breather. I had a very similar vibe in this game even though the first half scoring was wildly different, the execution of the game plan was spectacular...only to dry up in the second half with what seemed like little to no effort to adjust. Regardless of reasoning (play-calling, execution, depth issues, etc)....which is probably all of the above. Shades of grey as with everything in life.
They were very different games. Rees and Coan did more than enough to win the Fiesta Bowl; it was Elston and our defense that completely shit the bed. Conversely, our defense played heroically against OSU, and that should have been enough for us to win. But Correll and Lugg are fucking terrible, so we couldn't get anything going offensively. You just can't beat elite teams with the sort of half-ass recruiting that Kelly saddled us with. Freeman at least seems to understand that and should have things turned around sooner than later.
I try not to armchair QB. I realize it's annoying and quite frankly, I don't know enough about the X's and O's to warrant any strong opinions that should be taken seriously. But as fans, we're supposed to be emotional, irrational, and in the moment. I think that's what is on display. People want to win, they saw we were winning, and then it slips through your fingers again, and again. It's tough to swallow and whether objectively warranted or not, fingers are going to be pointed.
That's fair. Dale mentioned it earlier in another thread, but that's the first time we've looked like we belonged on the same field with one of the Big Three in decades. People are mad not primarily due to the loss (we're all too familiar with that feeling), but because we could have won that game . That's a better place to be, but the pain is more acute.

This isn't a Rees problem though. Fans who are in their feelings and calling for his head are obnoxious as fuck. Go scream at Kelly, Alexander or Quinn if you're looking for someone to hold accountable for Saturday's loss.
 

du Lac

CEO of IE
Messages
1,643
Reaction score
1,064
By data I pulled end of last year, we were 21st in P5 in Pass Explosiveness during the regular season according to CFBData.

We were 20th in Success Rate (again P5, CFBData, regular season).

The only other P5 teams that ranked above us in both were Wake Forest, Georgia and Alabama.

ND was actually extremely explosive when we got passes off last year. The main problem was getting them off. We were outside the Top 110 nationally in Havoc Allowed.
It's an OL issue. Period.
 

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,265
Reaction score
2,489
OSU didn't retake the lead until the final seconds of the 3rd quarter. Changing the game plan before then would have been very risky, and even in the 4th quarter, we had very few options with Patterson out and our lack of depth at the skill positions.

The demoralizing thing for me was watching our OL get whipped. OL and TE is where we're supposed to be able to go blow-for-blow with the Big Three. If we don't even have that, then Freeman's rebuild is going to take longer than I expected. There was a lot of talk about how Kelly left the cupboards well-stocked, which is true compared to what he inherited, but Alexander and Quinn created some serious holes that are going to take time to fill.

They were very different games. Rees and Coan did more than enough to win the Fiesta Bowl; it was Elston and our defense that completely shit the bed. Conversely, our defense played heroically against OSU, and that should have been enough for us to win. But Correll and Lugg are fucking terrible, so we couldn't get anything going offensively. You just can't beat elite teams with the sort of half-ass recruiting that Kelly saddled us with. Freeman at least seems to understand that and should have things turned around sooner than later.

That's fair. Dale mentioned it earlier in another thread, but that's the first time we've looked like we belonged on the same field with one of the Big Three in decades. People are mad not primarily due to the loss (we're all too familiar with that feeling), but because we could have won that game . That's a better place to be, but the pain is more acute.

This isn't a Rees problem though. Fans who are in their feelings and calling for his head are obnoxious as fuck. Go scream at Kelly, Alexander or Quinn if you're looking for someone to hold accountable for Saturday's loss.
- My first point was referencing after they fell behind, not before.

-Agreed on OL

-Yes different games, but I personally view the offensive struggles as a catalyst to why the defense gave up so many points (certainly not the main reason, but I don't believe it helped matters). The defense was great last year too, but when they're on the field he entire game, they run out of juice and are susceptible to giving up yards/points. I truly feel that one or two first downs could've given the defense enough of a breather that OSU's final ass pounding of a drive might've ended differently. ND was very close to getting off the field multiple times and just couldn't close. I think it's fair to think if the offense didn't go 6 plays-Punt, 6 plays-PUNT, 5 plays-PUNT that perhaps the defense could've caught their wind a little. Defense has to help the offense and vice versa. That's how I've always viewed it.

-Agree. That's where my pain lies and it is a better place...maybe...? I don't know what's worse as a fan. Getting blown out and just accepting you'll always be Tier 2 or having the Tier 1 rug pulled out from under you. And yes, I agree the extremist calls for Tommy's job are asinine. I just personally feel he holds some level of accountability and given the high stakes (and emotions) of that type of game, I can at least understand the backlash.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,110
Reaction score
27,369


Missing bullet point: Lugg wins enough 1-1, Correll provides useful support to Kristofic.

If Lugg gets pushed back faster than he did, is it a bad play call?
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
-Yes different games, but I personally view the offensive struggles as a catalyst to why the defense gave up so many points (certainly not the main reason, but I don't believe it helped matters). The defense was great last year too, but when they're on the field he entire game, they run out of juice and are susceptible to giving up yards/points. I truly feel that one or two first downs could've given the defense enough of a breather that OSU's final ass pounding of a drive might've ended differently. ND was very close to getting off the field multiple times and just couldn't close. I think it's fair to think if the offense didn't go 6 plays-Punt, 6 plays-PUNT, 5 plays-PUNT that perhaps the defense could've caught their wind a little. Defense has to help the offense and vice versa. That's how I've always viewed it.
We scored enough to win that game comfortably. Sure, it would have helped to have a couple long clock-eating drives in the 2nd half so our defense could rest. But Kyren chose to sit out the game, and we didn't have the OL to control the LOS.

It's just too easy to blame the offensive play caller. You can't look at that game in totality and claim that Rees was even within the top-10 reasons why we lost.
 

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,265
Reaction score
2,489
We scored enough to win that game comfortably. Sure, it would have helped to have a couple long clock-eating drives in the 2nd half so our defense could rest. But Kyren chose to sit out the game, and we didn't have the OL to control the LOS.

It's just too easy to blame the offensive play caller. You can't look at that game in totality and claim that Rees was even within the top-10 reasons why we lost.
Completely agree. Tommy is pretty far down the list for me. But it’s his thread and I’m just playing devils advocate I suppose.

Cheers to a blowout Saturday!
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,516
Reaction score
17,382
Let’s let it play out and see how it goes. I understand your reservations, even if I might disagree with some of them, but this is a new season, a new opportunity. If Tommy underperforms, we will be all the lesser for it. But if he succeeds and is able to overcome some deficiencies, we will have a great season. Plenty of ball to be played this year.
There will be growing pains this year. Too many youth having to start, all from Tommy's first and probably second classes once we see Merriweather. I expect Harry will clean up the miscommunication issues on the OL, but until Patterson is healthy and/or Lugg/Correll are either replaced or step up we'll see some physicality issues in the interior. Lesser teams shouldn't give us too many problems. This was always going to be a rebuilding year. '23 or '24 we should have the talent and depth to be firing on all cylinders. Until then, if we can manage another 10+ win season it would be impressive given the holes on offense and youth.
 

Crazy Balki

Site Assigned Optimist
Messages
7,868
Reaction score
4,477
Mike and Jamie basically broke it down moving forward on their Youtube breakdown of the Marshall game, but I imagine the Cal game is going to be a make-or-break game for Lugg and Correll. I don't imagine Marshall is going to give us any problems up front. We should dominate them. But Cal does have a pretty good defense, so if Lugg and Correll struggle, that is going to be indicative that it's time to try somebody else.
 
Top