You're welcome, lol.
What you're doing is painfully transparent. You want to get on record on the opposite side of the rumor to score imaginary internet points if it all works out and they can make the hire afterall. This is literally why I never post rumors publicly... because I have no interest in playing this game with people like you. I mean you obviously did not source something with someone at ND in the 10 minutes since I shared the rumor that was already making the rounds. You just posted to be contrarian, because you find that fun or something.
It certainly has "legs" in the sense that the person who had the news of his hire before anyone knows about the potential issue; the guy on this site that wanted to break the news here said there was an issue; and it's now been publicly discussed on many boards and confirmed by some other site staff to be an issue.
The only question is
how much of an issue it is and if they're going to find a way to make the hire. That we will find out in time. I happily await ND figuring their way out of the problem, and then you returning to be all "see, told you guys."
Anyways, as an aside, I really regret saving you from perma-ban back in the day. I voted for leniency and said that you just had a bad rap. Lesson learned, I guess.