Silly Season 2015/2016 (Coaching Changes)

Pops Freshenmeyer

Well-known member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
2,457
Yeah, on the surface, that was the weird thing to me. I don't understand how a rule that's on hypothetical right now could be retroactively enforced. I almost wonder if ND reached out to the NCAA to clear the hire and they said "don't do it until this is voted on because it could be a violation if the rule passes"... I don't know how that necessarily works, but really nothing surprises me with the NCAA. I guess we'll see.

It's also possible that ND is skittish of news headlines that NCAA outlaws thing ND just did two weeks ago.
 

BGIF

Varsity Club
Messages
43,946
Reaction score
2,922
Football coaches favor early signing period, 10th full-time assistant




Just so everyone sees what it is that is being proposed.

The key is current prospects.


Yes, the key is the word current AFTER the recommended Proposed Rule is presented to the members, not the coaches, for a vote AND passed. That should be sometime in the Spring which will be AFTER the 2017 Signing Day.

It would apply to subsequent recruiting classes, such as 2018, 2019, etc. and as presented in the article applies to a coach being hired by school A at the same time one of his players, a recruit, also signs an LOI with school A.
 
Last edited:

BGIF

Varsity Club
Messages
43,946
Reaction score
2,922
I'm hearing the same thing as Lax. It doesn't make sense to retroactively enforce that rule. However it's now being circulated on multiple boards. I'm sure we'll find out soon enough if it's true.


Being circulated on multiple boards doesn't make it correct. Nor does you repeating it here make it true.

It's a circular rumor.

Argumentum ad populum

If 50 million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing.
 

IrishFanForever23

Well-known member
Messages
1,216
Reaction score
595
Being circulated on multiple boards doesn't make it correct. Nor does you repeating it here make it true.

It's a circular rumor.

Argumentum ad populum

I don't think I said it being circulated on multiple boards makes it correct, did I? I believe I even said I'm sure we'll find out if it's true soon enough.

Thanks though, try again.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,085
I believe this rumor to be legless.

You believe this to be legless because:
A) You've spoken to a source at the NCAA
B) You've spoken to a source "in the know".
C) You have nothing to base your opinion on.
 

BGIF

Varsity Club
Messages
43,946
Reaction score
2,922
I don't think I said it being circulated on multiple boards makes it correct, did I? I believe I even said I'm sure we'll find out if it's true soon enough.

Thanks though, try again.


You wrote:
... It doesn't make sense to retroactively enforce that rule. However it's now being circulated on multiple boards. ...


"however" - To introduce a statement that contrasts with or seems to contradict something that has been said previously.


I agreed the rule "doesn't make sense" for the reasons stated in my other post regarding the NCAA rule making process AND timeframe. The process and timeframe for the promulgation of NCAA football rules has been discussed many times here over the years. It not new. It's available to anyone that takes the time to read it.

It doesn't matter how many boards report speculation to the contrary. There was thread posted yesterday with an inaccurate title, New Redshirt Rules. It was a Recommendation not a new rule. Had multiple boards cited that Irish Envy thread title they'd be wrong. However, the OP and connorin's post were valid.
 
Last edited:

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
Thanks for the neg reps, lol. I'm just saying I believe all is well here.

You're welcome, lol.

What you're doing is painfully transparent. You want to get on record on the opposite side of the rumor to score imaginary internet points if it all works out and they can make the hire afterall. This is literally why I never post rumors publicly... because I have no interest in playing this game with people like you. I mean you obviously did not source something with someone at ND in the 10 minutes since I shared the rumor that was already making the rounds. You just posted to be contrarian, because you find that fun or something.

It certainly has "legs" in the sense that the person who had the news of his hire before anyone knows about the potential issue; the guy on this site that wanted to break the news here said there was an issue; and it's now been publicly discussed on many boards and confirmed by some other site staff to be an issue.

The only question is how much of an issue it is and if they're going to find a way to make the hire. That we will find out in time. I happily await ND figuring their way out of the problem, and then you returning to be all "see, told you guys."

Anyways, as an aside, I really regret saving you from perma-ban back in the day. I voted for leniency and said that you just had a bad rap. Lesson learned, I guess.

You believe this to be legless because:
A) You've spoken to a source at the NCAA
B) You've spoken to a source "in the know".
C) You have nothing to base your opinion on.

c-is-for-cookie-o.gif
 

OCIrish

Fukk Michigan
Messages
3,280
Reaction score
218
You're welcome, lol.

What you're doing is painfully transparent. You want to get on record on the opposite side of the rumor to score imaginary internet points if it all works out and they can make the hire afterall. This is literally why I never post rumors publicly... because I have no interest in playing this game with people like you. I mean you obviously did not source something with someone at ND in the 10 minutes since I shared the rumor that was already making the rounds. You just posted to be contrarian, because you find that fun or something.

It certainly has "legs" in the sense that the person who had the news of his hire before anyone knows about the potential issue; the guy on this site that wanted to break the news here said there was an issue; and it's now been publicly discussed on many boards and confirmed by some other site staff to be an issue.

The only question is how much of an issue it is and if they're going to find a way to make the hire. That we will find out in time. I happily await ND figuring their way out of the problem, and then you returning to be all "see, told you guys."

Anyways, as an aside, I really regret saving you from perma-ban back in the day. I voted for leniency and said that you just had a bad rap. Lesson learned, I guess.



c-is-for-cookie-o.gif

Reps.........just because Cookie Monster!!
 

NDbrbkny

Member
Messages
703
Reaction score
23
dang taggart and co having a tough time in eugene i wonder the next wrong move it's him getting the ax?
 

NDinBoston

Active member
Messages
939
Reaction score
55
They are currently in the process of firing their other co-OC (David Reaves) for a DUI. Doesn't look good on their new staff at this point with suspending their SC coach and firing their co-OC in the first month of their employment.

Staff should check in with Thomas Graham...
 

BGIF

Varsity Club
Messages
43,946
Reaction score
2,922
The Scoop - Monday January 23, 2017 - FootballScoop

Michigan: With Jim Harbaugh heading into Year 3 in Ann Arbor, his contract calls for an increase of at least 10 percent to his assistant salary pool. AD Warde Manuel confirmed to MLive the pool will go up this year, but did not specify how much to MLive. Offensive coordinator Tim Drevno and defensive coordinator Don Brown have reportedly signed 5-year contracts, with Drevno making $1 million and Brown $1.4 million.
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
New Orleans Saints: The Saints have interviewed former Notre Dame defensive coordinator Brian VanGorder for a defensive staff position and plan to do so again tomorrow, per Alex Marvez.

The Scoop - Tuesday January 24, 2017 - FootballScoop

They want him to come back in because they're at a deadlock. Half the organization thinks he looks like Uncle Rico and the other half are saying Johnny Drama.

BcnVclOCMAElZYv.png


drama_sidebyside.png
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
But, but, ..."BVG's A BEAST!"

I will take all the heat. I thought he would be the next coming. Boy was I wrong.

Maybe he will do better back in the pro's. Maybe that is the environment he needs to be in. Maybe Uncle Rico will thrive.

But, Nah! After what I heard happened just last season in South Bend, I can't even wish him success.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,402
You're welcome, lol.

What you're doing is painfully transparent. You want to get on record on the opposite side of the rumor to score imaginary internet points if it all works out and they can make the hire afterall. This is literally why I never post rumors publicly... because I have no interest in playing this game with people like you. I mean you obviously did not source something with someone at ND in the 10 minutes since I shared the rumor that was already making the rounds. You just posted to be contrarian, because you find that fun or something.

It certainly has "legs" in the sense that the person who had the news of his hire before anyone knows about the potential issue; the guy on this site that wanted to break the news here said there was an issue; and it's now been publicly discussed on many boards and confirmed by some other site staff to be an issue.

The only question is how much of an issue it is and if they're going to find a way to make the hire. That we will find out in time. I happily await ND figuring their way out of the problem, and then you returning to be all "see, told you guys."

Anyways, as an aside, I really regret saving you from perma-ban back in the day. I voted for leniency and said that you just had a bad rap. Lesson learned, I guess.



c-is-for-cookie-o.gif

Damn it, Lax! The bolded is neg worthy.

latest
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,085
I will take all the heat. I thought he would be the next coming. Boy was I wrong.

Maybe he will do better back in the pro's. Maybe that is the environment he needs to be in. Maybe Uncle Rico will thrive.

But, Nah! After what I heard happened just last season in South Bend, I can't even wish him success.

Care to share in a PM?
 

GrangerIrish24

I bring nothing to the table
Messages
6,975
Reaction score
14,640
I will take all the heat. I thought he would be the next coming. Boy was I wrong.

Maybe he will do better back in the pro's. Maybe that is the environment he needs to be in. Maybe Uncle Rico will thrive.

But, Nah! After what I heard happened just last season in South Bend, I can't even wish him success.

Go on.....
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,128
Reaction score
11,077
They want him to come back in because they're at a deadlock. Half the organization thinks he looks like Uncle Rico and the other half are saying Johnny Drama.

BcnVclOCMAElZYv.png


drama_sidebyside.png

Then they're all idiots!

Everyone knows that Johnny Drama has way better hair and rocks the goatee in a way BVG never did.

He's clearly Uncle Rico.
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
Then they're all idiots!

Everyone knows that Johnny Drama has way better hair and rocks the goatee in a way BVG never did.

He's clearly Uncle Rico.

I can't have an opinion till I see BVG's calves.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
I think I posted most of this before.

BVG :
1) Really couldn't get along with most people except Joe Schmidt.
2) Really didn't click with Jaylon Smith, which not only isn't a good thing, but I think actually was one of the big, unseen negative affects on those defenses.
3) His ability to not get along with his defensive assistants was a key reason for over a season, defensive position meetings were cancelled, and the whole defense met as one group.
4) Was totally unfair (my subjectivity) with his treatment of Todd Lyght, where Todd showed absolute class, restraint and decorum, for his part, even though he made rookie mistakes as a coach.
5) BVG and Keith Gilmore's relationship would have resulted in record crowds had it be displayed where more appropriate, in the Bengal Bouts. One or two recorded incidents should never have been allowed to happen in front of recruits.
6) The ongoing dominance and authoritarian attitudes expressed had a lot of negative impact with the team, (my interpretation of facts, granted, but it didn't take much guesswork.)
7) Blowing off recruiting for other more cerebral aspects of coaching.

The list could go on. Stating it this way makes a lot of it seem actually more severe than it was. But together it all comprised somethings that should never have happened. Nobody likes that authoritarian environment, and it shows. What also shows is that changes took too long to make, and probably were a key factor in the overall poor season. It was bad enough that it affected everyone. Remember everyone liked Montgomery, so the whole situation was a cluster-fuck.
 
Last edited:
Top