K
koonja
Guest
correct.
That's exciting to know. I want to see him on ST. Him and Julian Love as punt gunners? Yes please.
Side note, line has shifted to -4.5.
correct.
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Nicco suspended for the first half due to his BS targeting call against USC in the season finale? If you get ejected in the second half of the last game of the season, and you still have eligibility you are automatically suspended for the first half of the season opener.
Total shyt.
Honestly, I don't think the punishment is wrong whatsoever. He spears people all of the time and plays downright reckless. He shouldn't just get nothing for a penalty that gets other players a first half of the next game penalty.
As I've said before about Nicco. I think he plays the game in a very disrespectful way. One big hit a game doesn't make up for a kid headhunting at all times. I'm glad he sat, one less half of him possibly injuring someone for no reason whatsoever.
God I hope the crowd is good for this one. I know there's going to be a lot of UGA fans, but I'm looking for some intensity from our crowd. If we bring it like we did against UM in 2015, I think we'll show well.
God I hope the crowd is good for this one. I know there's going to be a lot of UGA fans, but I'm looking for some intensity from our crowd. If we bring it like we did against UM in 2015, I think we'll show well.
Honestly, I don't think the punishment is wrong whatsoever. He spears people all of the time and plays downright reckless. He shouldn't just get nothing for a penalty that gets other players a first half of the next game penalty.
As I've said before about Nicco. I think he plays the game in a very disrespectful way. One big hit a game doesn't make up for a kid headhunting at all times. I'm glad he sat, one less half of him possibly injuring someone for no reason whatsoever.
I can't view youtube videos at work, but I assume it's Nicco's targeting call against USC. I remember watching the game with 3 SUPER FANS of PSU. All three thought it was a bad call. In slow mo, which the refs are able to use when watching a replay, he hits head to head. But watching the play full speed, I have a hard time thinking he was targeting.
The issue is not that there was a helmet to helmet hit. There unquestionably was. The issue was that in no way was the running back a defenseless player. He was a running back hitting a hole that was being filled by a safety. The safety cleaned his clock. It was a good football play. Good football plays sometimes end with people getting lit up.
I work with a lot of ND grads and I would say roughly half of the office has already sold their tickets to UGA fans. It's appalling, imo.
Hopefully I just work with a bunch of Benedict Arnolds and the rest of the ND ticket holders have some semblance of pride.
The issue is not that there was a helmet to helmet hit. There unquestionably was. The issue was that in no way was the running back a defenseless player. He was a running back hitting a hole that was being filled by a safety. The safety cleaned his clock. It was a good football play. Good football plays sometimes end with people getting lit up.
I work with a lot of ND grads and I would say roughly half of the office has already sold their tickets to UGA fans. It's appalling, imo.
Hopefully I just work with a bunch of Benedict Arnolds and the rest of the ND ticket holders have some semblance of pride.
I work with a lot of ND grads and I would say roughly half of the office has already sold their tickets to UGA fans. It's appalling, imo.
Hopefully I just work with a bunch of Benedict Arnolds and the rest of the ND ticket holders have some semblance of pride.
I think the punishment carrying over to the next season is wrong. That's one of my biggest issues with the targeting call.
The issue is not that there was a helmet to helmet hit. There unquestionably was. The issue was that in no way was the running back a defenseless player. He was a running back hitting a hole that was being filled by a safety. The safety cleaned his clock. It was a good football play. Good football plays sometimes end with people getting lit up.
I work with a lot of ND grads and I would say roughly half of the office has already sold their tickets to UGA fans. It's appalling, imo.
Hopefully I just work with a bunch of Benedict Arnolds and the rest of the ND ticket holders have some semblance of pride.
Can I ask why exactly? I guess I can't distinguish why the timing of the game on the schedule would make the punishment different for the penalty.
"good football plays" do not end with a player getting lit up with helmet to helmet contact. Nicco busted into that hole fully loaded with his usual spearing style of play. It was reckless and a penalty to the letter of the law, which I posted below bolded with Nicco's issue on that play.
"No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI)
Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:
•Launch—a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
• A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
• Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
•Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet"
If you watch the play, I don't see how it is defensible. That is even with not adding the fact that this is Nicco's MO. There are dozens of example on tape of him playing this way. I'm assuming that the refs weren't using his past history in the decision, but if I was a ST coach for an opponent, I would definitely see this in film and let the ref know pregame to watch out for it.
I'm all jacked up on Irish Kool-Ade, and after thinking about how crazy it is to expect a true freshman to carry the team on the road when he's just found out he's starting, I think the Irish can win.
I regret my bet with greyhammer, but I will follow through with it if Georgia wins by 13 or less.
Go Irish. Fvck Michigan.
Sadly, I think basically everyone cashed out. It's very disappointing to me... I know people who put in for this game just to sell them. One of my friends is a UGA fan and ticket broker and is going to this game... said the demand was entirely one-sided towards UGA fans. He expects at least 40% UGA fans at this game.
Sadly, I think basically everyone cashed out. It's very disappointing to me... I know people who put in for this game just to sell them. One of my friends is a UGA fan and ticket broker and is going to this game... said the demand was entirely one-sided towards UGA fans. He expects at least 40% UGA fans at this game.
This is kinda reminding me of Texas last year isn't it? Their OL doesn't appear to be anything special, if not, their weakness. QB is very green. RB' were good.
Does it? or am i off?