Rumored Violations

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Reading between the lines here, this is how big institutions act when they're afraid of getting sued. Everything is extremely formal, certified mail only, etc. I'm hoping this is just the influence of the Office of General Counsel, but it may also indicate that ND is truly worried about getting sued over this.

There are a number of ND alum in your profession that have made it clear that their services would be available for any of these students. They are alumni interested in administration change, too. Some pretty effective, knowledgeable, capable individuals.

If a friend of mine who is an active alum could name names, and quote quotes, so, I will wager can members of the administration! Food for thought.

"What makes an angry crowd with pitchforks dangerous, is not the pitchfork, its that nobody is interested in telling them to put it down!"

Bogtrotter 10-01-14

And oh, yes. Not wanting to return the players for Stanford for causing the delay is out of the equation. Unless there is pretty substantial proof that these players were actively cheating, no one is going to side with the school against the players, no matter what the outcome.
 
Last edited:

ACamp1900

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings
Messages
48,944
Reaction score
11,225
the case against each guy should stand on its own merits as pertains to that guy--not have to fit into some interconnected theory the council may have.

Scenario- Play 'A' gives them one story... they clear him... and use bits of his story to presumably condemn others.... then players 'B', 'C", 'D', and 'E' all give them a completely different story that blows player "A"s up...

oops.
 

ND NYC

New member
Messages
3,571
Reaction score
209
This. Not really sure why some can't understand this concept.







Not when there all multiple, interconnecting stories to account for. Makes total sense.

"stories" to me equals hearsay.
so youre really saying ND wants each guy to either exonorate or prove the guilt of the others?
IMO it should be ND having FACTS to rule on (that were accumulated during their investigation, that ended Aug 28) for them to let these kids know the charges against EACH GUY, based on those gathered FACTS they uncovered for EACH guy.
and then each kid can tell his side of his OWN case. and council should rule on that individual.

anything else is a codified witch hunt
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
understood but its distrubing they told KVR per his tweet that they need to finish up all the others before telling him his fate.

If his only valid charge is whether or not he turned others in for cheating, then wouldn't it make sense that he couldn't be found guilty if they were not?
 

ThePiombino

The OG "TP"
Messages
16,476
Reaction score
6,245
"stories" to me equals hearsay.
so youre really saying ND wants each guy to either exonorate or prove the guilt of the others?
IMO it should be ND having FACTS to rule on (that were accumulated during their investigation, that ended Aug 28) for them to let these kids know the charges against EACH GUY, based on those gathered FACTS they uncovered for EACH guy.
and then each kid can tell his side of his OWN case. and council should rule on that individual.

anything else is a codified witch hunt

Semantics. Stories, accounts, testimony. Call it what you will. These offenses are not mutually exclusive of one another. ACamp just gave a perfect example of why all hearings should be had before a ruling.
 

ND NYC

New member
Messages
3,571
Reaction score
209
Scenario- Play 'A' gives them one story... they clear him... and use bits of his story to presumably condemn others.... then players 'B', 'C", 'D', and 'E' all give them a completely different story that blows player "A"s up...

oops.

i thought these kids fates would be decided by the facts uncovered in the investiagtion. not the "stories" the others would or could say about them.
the burden of proof is on ND, here....isnt it?
 

ACamp1900

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings
Messages
48,944
Reaction score
11,225
"stories" to me equals hearsay.
so youre really saying ND wants each guy to either exonorate or prove the guilt of the others?
IMO it should be ND having FACTS to rule on (that were accumulated during their investigation, that ended Aug 28) for them to let these kids know the charges against EACH GUY, based on those gathered FACTS they uncovered for EACH guy.
and then each kid can tell his side of his OWN case. and council should rule on that individual.

anything else is a codified witch hunt

I'm not saying that's their goal... but you never want to put yourself in the situation I presented, that simple.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,575
Reaction score
20,024
I just hope they use FedEx Next Day AM delivery.
 
C

Cackalacky

Guest
"stories" to me equals hearsay.
so youre really saying ND wants each guy to either exonorate or prove the guilt of the others?
IMO it should be ND having FACTS to rule on (that were accumulated during their investigation, that ended Aug 28) for them to let these kids know the charges against EACH GUY, based on those gathered FACTS they uncovered for EACH guy.
and then each kid can tell his side of his OWN case. and council should rule on that individual.

anything else is a codified witch hunt

I don't think this is really applicable. Especially if they shared materials or documents or received the same benefit from multiple people. Like ACamp said you can't rule on one and then have the others contradict your ruling.
 
Last edited:

IrishSteelhead

All Flair, No Substance
Messages
11,114
Reaction score
4,686
I just hope they use FedEx Next Day AM delivery.

RJQB_RSE2HkpwQ59WbAswZZIrsmPJ15HLAywIxWTl6VmFOvF2AGRidXzdemc6LevTxdE2LBOy5phHKZaZUee7WQkti3Y4DFNuLN7DoTAUzV_S-pabv9p-mySiCs_uNyDI6Ud9lX8qly9dnO_t6IqfNch33c6-w=w533-h400-nc


All this wait, only to find out the mail is a certificate verifying a year long membership in the jelly of the month club......
 
K

koonja

Guest
Chipper got bit by a porcupine (italics). But I'm out and can't check. Can someone pm me wha hats going on?
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,575
Reaction score
20,024
The letter would be sent using on-campus mail. If sent in the morning, it would be in the players' hands by the afternoon.


Obviously after all this time what would another day or two mean in the grand scheme of things?

Guess I should have used italics!
 
Last edited:
K

koonja

Guest
So KVR had his hearings yesterday, I assume others had them today, KVR says we're still waiting, DD and PD have ambiguous, yet positive tweets, and Kelly's conference is tomorrow.

KVR's comments are about what I expected. Today was a positive day IMO.
 

Fbolt

I've been around
Messages
6,932
Reaction score
2,252
I get the need for separation between FB and Academics. However, the speed with which this process has taken place is inexcusable, especially when considering the trauma/stigma placed on these student-athletes - regardless of their guilt or innocence.

They've all handled it better than I would have. BS.
 
K

koonja

Guest
Saw on Rivals that ND law grads have been offering the families pro bono help on this.
 

TheOneWhoKnocks

New member
Messages
691
Reaction score
46
I can recognize a member of the squad anywhere, but who are the other two? Hardy and Moore?

You lost me lol.

Side note if DD is not coming back. Brent needs to play and play now. If hes what Koon and I think he is, he aint sticking around for a 5th anyways.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top