NDohio
Well-known member
- Messages
- 5,869
- Reaction score
- 3,060
I thought that he didn't cheat on the tests, but he let other cheat off of him a bunch of times?
That was brought up at one point but quickly shot down.
I thought that he didn't cheat on the tests, but he let other cheat off of him a bunch of times?
I wasn't going to bring this up, but there are some statements Kelly has made that don't quite fit in to the status quo narrative of this whole thing.
Some revolve around when the individuals knew they were being investigated. If this thing happened and they investigated these guys from July 29th to August 15th without giving these guys any indication that they were investigating them, including the girl who most accounts have as being the one that tied all of the incidents together, so it was sprung on everyone with no warning, that would be one thing.
Now I have never been involved in an incident like this at ND, it is true. But I sat on a oversight board at two other institutions of higher learning, and I cannot think of a case in the general area of academic dishonesty where the subject of the investigation didn't have an idea that they were being investigated. In fact, I always found it funny, the worse the case, it seemed, the more paranoid the party became. Just like clockwork. It was kid of humorous; but I digress . . .
Anyway. He didn't have any idea until Jack called him, yet he or his staff had no contact with any of the individuals, even in notifying them that they shouldn't practice. I understand why he would conduct himself the way he is, but there are just some things that are off.
Carried forward to yesterday, when Kelly had the ultimate gem. To paraphrase, Kelly wouldn't have a problem with any of the four attending a position meeting, but to the best of his knowledge, none had. After Anna Hickey reported a KVR citing . . .
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/PibDMGxiyJw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
There was always a rumor that DD was involved with the EG incident. But since then most sources, including DD and his dad have indicated that his entire incident was a problem with a statistics class that rendered him ineligible from a low GPA. That is not the same as academic dishonesty.
In addition to people calling all of this scandals, salacious bastards! I don't get the erroneous urge to call DD a past cheater! I would like to believe this is all something more than stereotypes, but I have an acquaintance who is a ND grad and a big member of one of the Alum chapters, and this person is balls to the wall, "Fire Kelly," and get rid of all "the substandard student athletes." Of which the demon Golson would be first!
I don't get it. NDSean, I don't see you as anything like this person, but I just can't get over the inaccuracies in these stories that are working against Kelly and these kids!
Next I had a friend who decided to copy code from another friend. Copying code is probably the most gray area of plagiarism, because there IS a most efficient way to write code, and it's not out of the realm of possibility that two sections of code would be virtually identical. They both fought it and were told by the professor "sign this and take a zero on the assignment or at the hearing I'm going to get both of you Fs in the class and kicked out of school."
A Colin's show yesterday (I don't know about today) was fabulously supportive. If he is doing it two days in a row that makes me wonder.
About Golson, there were awful rumors from some alumni circles, the gut feeling I got was that Golson was a barbarian, (just like Tony Rice), i.e., they had an uncomfortable racist edge to them. So I don't know if we will ever know the straight scoop on Everett. The story has been permanently fouled by others on both sides with agendas.
I do find all of this fascinating, however.
I just always assume a football coach is lying when he's speaking to the media.
Haha... No.
Things make you go hmmmm.....
If DD's issue is with a class and a low GPA, then why would he be involved with this issue, unless his is for both? If for both, then he's pretty bad at cheating if he's failing!
I thought that he didn't cheat on the tests, but he let other cheat off of him a bunch of times?
Haha... No.
I thought that he didn't cheat on the tests, but he let other cheat off of him a bunch of times?
Low GPA might make you ineligible to compete in varsity athletics, but wasn't DD temporarily dismissed from the University itself? That indicates something more severe than low grades.
I guarantee you that well over 50% of program code is copied and used over and over. Why reinvent the wheel is the programmers mantra!
I thought that he didn't cheat on the tests, but he let other cheat off of him a bunch of times?
Haha... No.
That was brought up at one point but quickly shot down.
I had read that, and originally thought that as well, until I talked to the student, who was pretty sincere in his story. Again, I don't know if it's completely true or not, just passing along what a student passed on to me.
I think it was our very own IrishSpartan who came out and said that Golson had been caught letting others copy his work.
It was met with skepticism and no reputable sources ever commented on that angle, at least not that I ever saw. The closest we had was when Golson was asked straight up by Andy Staples if he cheated, and he responded with a "yeahhhhh, something like that," which could mean any number of things in terms of "cheating."
Using work for credit twice is always an issue.
And of course in today's classroom there are all kind of possibilities. My prof friend that has seen it all says that the most likely ways of cheating he sees today are, using your own work twice, without permission, for two classes. Additional information on computers and from online notes and Power Point presentations used for in class essay's. And he notes that a lot of people that use computers for legitimate research actually log into social sites, with another student who has the answers. So there are all shades.
Back to breaking news...
Don't slay the messenger - just passing along some info.
My cousin is an alum and on campus a lot for work. He said the talk on campus is similar to what Chiro originally posted. 3 of the 4 have been cleared (all but Moore), but they are waiting for 2 other students to return to campus to complete the investigation. He said this centered around Russell's girl friend.
I had to ask him twice to make sure that he did not get this off a message board...
TIFWIW
FWIW, there is another poster at DD hearing the same as the other guy (Chiro). Who knows, hope this ends soon.
FWIW, there is another poster at DD hearing the same as the other guy (Chiro). Who knows, hope this ends soon.
I obviously have no facts. But I'm not sure if I believe that Moore would be the only guy in serious trouble since it is centered on Russell's girlfriend. Seems a bit optimistic....
This has to be an anomaly.
And I dont know how that red thumbs down showed up on my post. I didnt put it
FWIW, there is another poster at DD hearing the same as the other guy (Chiro). Who knows, hope this ends soon.
Everyone just needs to pump the breaks. I don't believe that any of those guys on DomerDomain has a legitimate, 1st hand source on this shit. Just because they heard something around campus doesn't mean it has any more weight than a message board rumor... because it's just word of mouth spreading around campus.
And that's the nicest I can put it.
Using work for credit twice is always an issue.
And of course in today's classroom there are all kind of possibilities. My prof friend that has seen it all says that the most likely ways of cheating he sees today are, using your own work twice, without permission, for two classes. Additional information on computers and from online notes and Power Point presentations used for in class essay's. And he notes that a lot of people that use computers for legitimate research actually log into social sites, with another student who has the answers. So there are all shades.
Here is my original point about Everett, and about this "scandal," as well. I don't care whether you love him, hate him, or don't give a shit. Occam's Razor looks for the simplest solution. If he had been a constant cheater, he probably never would have put the work in to raise his game, the way he did in '11-'12, and again this year. Similarly, if this was really a widespread sex for homework scandal, rumors would be flying everywhere.
I think Golson is a likeable guy, maybe not the wiz in the classroom he is on the field, and may have made more than one or two mistakes. But he isn't the out of control sociopath that I have actually heard some say. Those people have bought in sub-consciously, or consciously to the racist/classist angle, of the bad Kelly player. And the same is true of calling this incident a "scandal." And believing it is widespread, and that one female student is humping dozens of football players. That is spread by the human tendency to repeat bad news, and make it worse. And it was also aided by those that want this winning class of underclass athletes gone. And in the meantime we have a situation that is not clear-cut, where some young peoples future's are on the line.
That is why I am recalcitrant to knock any player or student without overwhelming proof. Most people lie, and it ruins the reputation of innocent and guilty parties, equally.
I obviously have no facts. But I'm not sure if I believe that Moore would be the only guy in serious trouble since it is centered on Russell's girlfriend. Seems a bit optimistic....
to repeat bad news, and make it worse......Exchange of information is one thing, but idle gossip treated as valuable information? For some, once gossip it out there, it is as good as true. I suspect very few Irish Envy posters can talk in tongues, but man can we wag them!
...
And I dont know how that red thumbs down showed up on my post. I didnt put it
I'm sad. I expected better
Everyone just needs to pump the breaks. I don't believe that any of those guys on DomerDomain has a legitimate, 1st hand source on this shit. Just because they heard something around campus doesn't mean it has any more weight than a message board rumor... because it's just word of mouth spreading around campus.
And that's the nicest I can put it.
F-that. I BELIEVE! They'll be back for the Michigan game. Take it to the bank. No info.
I'll bet 10,000,000 vbangers on it.