STLDomer
Schmitty
- Messages
- 9,426
- Reaction score
- 549
Part of me believe kelly was calling plays this game reason being hardly any tight ends got targeted?
Part of me believe kelly was calling plays this game reason being hardly any tight ends got targeted?
Part of me believe kelly was calling plays this game reason being hardly any tight ends got targeted?
He's probably on the field because Kelly wants him next to him so he can tutor him. You know, since has basically no OC experience. This hire was so strange. You have the Elko hire which was pretty damn good according to most, then this complete head scratcher.
Yup. Perhaps a rollout or two, maybe add in a hard count. They seemed to time up the snap pretty well as the game went on.
Part of me believe kelly was calling plays this game reason being hardly any tight ends got targeted?
Regarding your points:People want to debate a lot of aspects of the game and/or coaching. But two plays in favor of Georgia determined the game.
1. The circus catch by Terry Godwin on third down, which was called by the SEC ref near it, as out of bounds and reversed on replay. He did not have possession when his foot was down and did not land inbounds when he did.
2. The hit on Fromm by Okwara near the sidelines, also on third down, as Fromm was at the sidelines. Ga gets a first down. Swift breaks a 40 run then the Irish are penalized with a horsecollar (valid call) putting Georgia on the 6 yard line. Jeez, this is football. Okwara left his feet while the QB was inbounds. This does not get called in the NFL. This is football!
That's fourteen points.
If either goes ND's way, we win. If both are reversed and we give Ga a field goal instead of a TD on the Godwin mistake by replay, we win by 9. Words cannot express on this board my feelings....
As it is, some blame players, coaches and fans.
Regarding your points:
1) His foot absolutely was in bounds before his body hit out of bounds. I thought the ball may have moved after contact with the ground, but honestly that call could have gone either way. That said, if the review officials were focused on the foot in or out of bounds before he went down, then they made the right call. That was a touchdown. Though, I highly doubt Notre Dame gets that call on the road in Georgia.
2) Don't agree that Okwara was in the air when ball was released, but definitely he was about to step away at that time. I think that was a b******* call. However, no point in comparing this to the NFL. This is still college. But you're right in this case, should not have been a penalty.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
As soon as that call was made my mind went back to FSU. Too many old wounds...
Regarding your points:
1) His foot absolutely was in bounds before his body hit out of bounds. I thought the ball may have moved after contact with the ground, but honestly that call could have gone either way. That said, if the review officials were focused on the foot in or out of bounds before he went down, then they made the right call. That was a touchdown. Though, I highly doubt Notre Dame gets that call on the road in Georgia.
2) Don't agree that Okwara was in the air when ball was released, but definitely he was about to step away at that time. I think that was a b******* call. However, no point in comparing this to the NFL. This is still college. But you're right in this case, should not have been a penalty.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Granted that we play in college football today with its replay rules and rules on hits on QBs, but if the Godwin call could go either way, the call by the ref on the field is not supposed to be overturned. Noted that you agree with me on the Okwara hit on Fromm.
My greater point is the need to reflect on criticisms of so many when the game easily could have been ND's. It is what it is. Georgia squeaked out a win when Wimbush was sacked with a minute to go.
I think both points are valid. I really doubt ND gets that TD catch overturned in their favor (thinking of Floyd against MSU in 2009 and Grimes against Stanford in 2007).
Cannot speak for others, but for me the issue isn't losing this ONE close game to UGA (where opportunities on both sides were squandered); the issue is that we are REPEATEDLY losing these games in the last couple of years against teams that are marginal top 25 (end of season) or better, and cannot seem to beat top 15 (end of season) or better teams in the last 4 years (last 'quality' win was MSU in 2013).
I think both points are valid. I really doubt ND gets that TD catch overturned in their favor (thinking of Floyd against MSU in 2009 and Grimes against Stanford in 2007).
Cannot speak for others, but for me the issue isn't losing this ONE close game to UGA (where opportunities on both sides were squandered); the issue is that we are REPEATEDLY losing these games in the last couple of years against teams that are marginal top 25 (end of season) or better, and cannot seem to beat top 15 (end of season) or better teams in the last 4 years (last 'quality' win was MSU in 2013).
LSU in 2014 but your point still stands.
It's been longer than 4 years really. There's some exceptions, but we seem to fall apart in the big games more often than not. For every 2012 Oklahoma there's 4 or 5 losses.
It's been longer than 4 years really. There's some exceptions, but we seem to fall apart in the big games more often than not. For every 2012 Oklahoma there's 4 or 5 losses.
The biggest issue with the gameplan on Sat was the passing plays that were put in for the week. It seemed we were counting on establishing the run after running all over Temple and almost every pass play was a play action. This hurt because UGA was bringing so much pressure that by the time Wimbush finished the play action, there was already a defender in his face. Watch how often this happened throughout the game. It started on the second drive of the game, and the coaching staff just kept calling PA passes. Rather than use more traditional dropback passes to set up the run, we kept running play action (even on obvious passing downs) and Wimbush was throwing off his back foot, unable to even look down field. Brutal to watch.
I am sure it has been said but Adams is slow to the hole. We need more quick hitters instead of counters.
Adams is schizophrenic. One week he looks super fast/athletic the next week he looks like a plodder. It's not always about who we play, Temple to Georgia. He looked great last year against USC and they always have athletes on D. Weird.
This prolly has more to do with the defenses he faces than anything else. I'm pretty sure he's 100% healthy, so I really don't see any other logical explanation why he "fluctuates".
This is spot on. It is one thing to run against Temple and another against GA. Plus if you really thinks that Williams would have more success that is wishful thinking. There was no place to run.
This prolly has more to do with the defenses he faces than anything else. I'm pretty sure he's 100% healthy, so I really don't see any other logical explanation why he "fluctuates".
Talked to Allen Pinkett today and he said not playing Williams was a bad/horrible move by the coaches. Nothing drives a defense more crazier then trying to stop a speedy back.