Dude you honestly are one of my Heroes on this forum.... but WHAT ARE YOU WATCHING!!!!!! #20 GETS BEAR HUGGED AND # 7 TAKES A STEP OFF THE LOS AND MAKES A CUT INSIDE WHICH MAKES CONTACT WITH THE DEFENDER!!! IT LOOKS LIKE A PRETTY NORMAL FUKIN FOOTBALL PLAY!!!
I't's nice to hear that I'm one of your Heroes on this forum even as the other shoe falls. And though I do wear glasses, I don't need capital letters to read. I just had my eyes checked on Thursday and got a great report. Do you need the caps to see clearly tonight or did your caps lock just get stuck?
In the 9 years I've been posting on this site, I've been a passionate fan of Notre Dame, team and school, but I haven't been a homer nor do I post when drinking or overwrought with emotion. I root for my team but I praise the opponents that make good plays and I don't curse out my players when the other guys make an excellent plays. Nor do I hide behind the refs when we get beat ... or beat ourselves.
About a month ago I received a somewhat similar post to yours, something about being a long time valuable poster but in essence I was told to extricate my head from my rectum because I didn't know what I watching. It after the game where Redfield got flagged for a Targeting Hit. The popular commentary was "we got jobbed" there as well. "Bogus Call", "The Fix Was In" "Conference Refs are homers", blah, blah, blah.
I had commented that 10 years ago Redfield's hit would be on the day's decleater highlights but this year it's a foul and with all the focus on head injury prevention that kind of aggressive hit is going to be called more than it isn't. Refs have been told to watch for and to call it tight. It was pointed out that those same refs didn't call the guy that gave Trumbetti's a headache.
Anyway my opening sentence praiser went on to advise me that he had spoken to a couple of friends that ref HIGH SCHOOL ball and they told him it wasn't. I avoided the pissing contest with him as I hadn't spoken to HS ref acquaintances about a NCAA FBS rule. The information I posted was a paraphase from a conversation I had with an FBS Director of Officals. My neighbor came over after the came and we were talking about that hit and I mentioned that the bulk of ND fans thought we were robbed but I though it was the appropriate call considering the intent of the rule, head injury. My neighbor who is well connected in sports circles at the college level pulled out his cell phone and started talking to someone about Redfield's hit. He put the call on speaker and the three of us discussed the hit, the rule, and the call.
This individual requested anonymity which I respected, I made no mention of him in my post. He pointed out that according to the precise letter of the rule, Redfield's hit did not explictly compile with every word of the rule but the nature of his hit was clearly what FBS were being told to watch for and enforce today. He noted that 10 years ago Redfield would probably get a game ball for that hit. Today that same hit can get a player ejected.
I found it interestingly that although I paraphrased him pretty closely I was told I didn't know what I was talking about in the matter either.
Tonight Syria did what I've done many years on this board he posted the rule. Interesting that while he posted rule for discussion, the complainers avoided it preferring to talk about their glory days playing football and why it anecdotally wasn't an infraction.
phgreek didn't quote the rule but he described it pretty closely in his through commentary. Again the protesters didn't engage him in dialog.
But the best comment I heard all night was:
It was a penalty. I used to coach that play and that wasn't the way I taught it.
Those were Lou Holtz's words on ESPN's Final Countdown. Holtz obviously must be a guy with an axe to grind. Hmm, Hall of Fame Coach. Won a NC at ND. No brother-in-law that's a ref. Why would Holtz not walk in lockstep with the masses?
Should we wonder what Lou was watching. They ran an interesting segment on that nullified TD. First they played the clip. Then they discussed it. Then they broke to Fisher's post game presser where he commented that ND had run a similar play earlier in the game and he had brought that perceived pick to the ref's attention.
I found that interesting as just last week Kelly had called attention to UNC fouling the long snapper in violation of the rules. Sure enough UNC did it again and that time the official saw it and called it. That's called good coaching when it's your guy and gets call a conspiracy when that same tactic works for the other team.
In Kelly's presser he responded to a question that "I don't don't teach illegal plays." He would be stupid to do so. But you do teach your players how to play to the letter of the rule and hope the call goes your way. No he didn't teach them to make illegal plays. I submit they didn't do precisely what they were instructed. They overplayed their part and got caught.
On Final Countdown they then went to Robby's first TD and wow there is a similar play. That's the one Fisher pointed out to the officials.
Most teams use a pick or rub play but the difference is the offensive player has to walk a tight line between fair play and foul play. On the TDs are guys over did they job. They were so intent of blocking the defenders they forget they were supposed to be receivers. Had they done a reasonable job of deception ND wins. It was a well designed ball and Golson and Robby executed perfectly as did the OLine and RB. The other two receivers forgot to be receivers and as the rule Syria posted it's incumbent upon them to do so.
The LOS was the 2-1/2 yd line so one step into the endzone was "crossing the line".
ARTICLE 8. a.
During a down in which a legal forward pass crosses the neutralMichigan
zone, illegal contact by Team A and Team B players is prohibited from the timeMichigan
the ball is snapped until it is touched by any player or an official (A.R. 7-3-8-II).
b.
Offensive pass interference by a Team A player beyond the neutral zoneMichigan
during a legal forward pass play in which a forward pass crosses theMichigan
neutral zone is contact that interferes with a Team B eligible player.MichiganIt isMichigan
the responsibility of the offensive player to avoid the opponents.Michigan
It is notMichiganoffensive pass interference (A.R. 7-3-8-IV, V, X, XV and XVI):
1.
When, after the snap, a Team A ineligible player immediately chargesMichigan
and contacts an opponent at a point not more than one yard beyond theMichigan
neutral zone and does not continue the contact more than three yardsMichigan
beyond the neutral zone.
2. When two or more eligible players are making a simultaneous and bonaMichigan
fide attempt to reach, catch or bat the pass. Eligible players of eitherMichigan
team have equal rights to the ball (A.R. 7-3-8-IX).
3. When the pass is in flight and two or more eligible players are in the areaMichigan
where they might receive or intercept the pass and an offensive player inMichigan
that area impedes an opponent, and the pass is not catchable.