Any chance the Big 10 kicks them out?
Its a cautionary tale, for certain. You damn well better be careful whom you hitch your wagon to. The community didn't care, didn't take much time to figure out who they were hitching their wagon to, they saw wins and money and said, hey ok, we're on board. I'm not saying those folks deserved to be punished, but life isn't a fair thing. The NCAA isn't damaging the community, Paterno is the one damaging the community. If he'd been ethical to begin with, this wouldn't be happening. He's to blame, not the NCAA. They are just the messenger.
This fine is not enough. PSU's endowment is in the billions. If it is just this fine, I will be less than satisfied.
I don't think that's a fair argument. You're absolutely right that you need to be careful who you associate with, but in this particular case Paterno had everyone fooled. Hindsight is 20/20.
I feel the point is being missed here, because the people you are speaking of, make up the institution. These people are totally intertwined in the web that is Penn State as an institution, and therefore are somewhat culpable for the wrongdoings. To answer your question, there is not any possible way to punish the institution itself without punishing the people that make it up.I guess the real question that the NCAA needs to figure out is how to punish an institution itself, and not simply the people that make it up. If anybody can give a satisfactory answer to that, I think we'll know what the NCAA really needs to do.
Some of these penalties and sanctions may not even matter, if in fact the Department of Education finds that Penn State violated Title IX policies, via the Clery Act. This could lead to the suspension of federal student aid, which would effectively end the University.
The thought that the university had no part in this cover up is naive at best, and the NCAA is definitely within its rights to hand down any punishment they deem necessary.
I guess the real question that the NCAA needs to figure out is how to punish an institution itself, and not simply the people that make it up. If anybody can give a satisfactory answer to that, I think we'll know what the NCAA really needs to do.
I was contemplating bringing this up because I didn't take the time to read through the entire thread to see if it had been discussed already. I definitely believe that it is interesting, and will be something to keep an eye on.When you first started championing this thought, I thought "that sounds good, but there is some kind of catch", but the more I research it... you are absolutely right on this. PSU certainly did enough to voilate the Clery Act how it's written, it all depends on how the DoE addresses it. Interesting to say the least.
I feel the point is being missed here, because the people you are speaking of, make up the institution. These people are totally intertwined in the web that is Penn State as an institution, and therefore are somewhat culpable for the wrongdoings. To answer your question, there is not any possible way to punish the institution itself without punishing the people that make it up.
This is more than just a problem with the institution itself, but involves the entire culture around the community. Joe Paterno was the institution, and was perceived as too big to fail by the University officials. He was put up on this pedestal by the entire Penn State community. THEY, or the people you speak of, gave him the power he needed to cover up the horrifying actions of Jerry Sandusky.
Okay that's fair, I should have been more specific with my question. I guess the main issue I have with talk of the death penalty, massive bowl bans, etc. is that it places the vast majority of the punishment on the shoulders of the current Penn St football players. These are kids who were 8, 9, 10 years old when all of this was happening and have done literally nothing wrong. I don't know what the solution is, but the message I get from some of the punishments being suggested is that the NCAA, B1G, and Penn State should be actively looking to punish somebody, anybody, no matter their involvement with the actual crime.
How could a fine harm anyone at PSU? They would have a few less $ in the bank. Kill the FB or perhaps all sports and that will get their attention (is the SEC listening?)….
So others are hurt?
Perhaps we should have let John Gotti alone because his tailor and his mistress and his sommelier would have a hard time if he could no longer support them.
The thing about this affair that really galls me is where was the anger when Spanier=JP II; Curry and Schultz (?spelling?)= countless Monsignors and bishops, and Cardinal Law ( and hundreds of others)=Joe Paterno?
Was what they did any different? If so, how?
What sanctions did they endure ?
Okay that's fair, I should have been more specific with my question. I guess the main issue I have with talk of the death penalty, massive bowl bans, etc. is that it places the vast majority of the punishment on the shoulders of the current Penn St football players. These are kids who were 8, 9, 10 years old when all of this was happening and have done literally nothing wrong. I don't know what the solution is, but the message I get from some of the punishments being suggested is that the NCAA, B1G, and Penn State should be actively looking to punish somebody, anybody, no matter their involvement with the actual crime.
I get your point, but how many players were still in high school when Reggie Bush was getting paid and his parents had a house bought for them? The current players always pay for the crimes of others. Otherwise, there would be no repurcussions for illegal conduct. Its the program that has to pay, regardless of who the current players are.
And that's the issue I have with the NCAA. They need to figure out a way to punish the actual perpetrators and not just the kids that people like Pete Carroll screw over on their way out of town to greener pastures. I hate USC as much as everyone else here, but does anyone here really believe that the current players at USC deserve to be banned from playing in bowl games because Reggie Bush and Pete Carroll are a$$holes? I certainly don't. Again, I'm not sure what the solution is, but there needs to be a better solution than the current one.
Hey Chaeillion, I don't know where our posts went, but I don't think I've been more critical than anyone else as far as this matter is concerned. I certainly don't think I've posted anything that would make me a "fool." I do hate Penn St. for a lot of reasons going back over 30 years, but I don't like what has happened there nor do I wish any kind of penalty that is not deserved. The crimes that were committed and the coverup that ensued are the worst things I've ever heard of on a college campus.
And that's the issue I have with the NCAA. They need to figure out a way to punish the actual perpetrators and not just the kids that people like Pete Carroll screw over on their way out of town to greener pastures. I hate USC as much as everyone else here, but does anyone here really believe that the current players at USC deserve to be banned from playing in bowl games because Reggie Bush and Pete Carroll are a$$holes? I certainly don't.
I'd also like to touch on how much people have been talking about NCAA sanctions as a deterrent for others. I totally disagree. As long as guys like Carroll, Calipari, Tressel, etc. can just pack up and leave for a new town or new team once the NCAA comes calling with sanctions, there is no reason for coaches to play by the rules other than personal integrity, which JoePa just proved once and for all is essentially nonexistent in the world of college sports. Again, I'm not sure what the solution is, but there needs to be a better solution than the current one.
I agree with you, but no team would ever have to face the death penalty or a bowl ban or any other type of serious punishment if they couldn't punish the current and future teams.