- Messages
- 9,727
- Reaction score
- 2,399
One of the games I am worried about. I think they will give up 45 points a game and score probably 55 so they win. They still have holes in their roster but they have a experienced head coach. Yes they both have a lot of new staff but give me the experienced coach with new staff.
Damn, I was about to say we should still win this one this year given the talent advantage we have in the trenches, but who knows when it comes to Southern Cal receivers and our secondary/LBs. It may end up being a shoot out when all is said and done, unless the defense makes some serious strides this year.
They've had better at QB/WR and we've had worse at DB.Damn, I was about to say we should still win this one this year given the talent advantage we have in the trenches, but who knows when it comes to Southern Cal receivers and our secondary/LBs. It may end up being a shoot out when all is said and done, unless the defense makes some serious strides this year.
thinking this is my receptionist here at work, but would need to confirm some tats to be sureAs always, for good luck...no losses to Southern Cal in seasons I've posted it.
![]()
thinking this is my receptionist here at work, but would need to confirm some tats to be sure![]()
I actually like that SC is getting more hype. The more the better. ND has had it’s share and considering the OL/DL that’s returning they deserve some of it but TBF, Freeman has never been a HC before so I’m fine w/ SC, Utah, tOSU & the usual suspects getting more hype.![]()
ESPN re-ranks Way-Too-Early-Top-25 after massive transfer
Did the Irish move up? Move down? Or stay the same?fightingirishwire.usatoday.com
Please look who ESPN put #4
And please look at the picture they used
(also, this is not an ESPN link, so they will not get f'ing clicks)
Edit: I suppose the picture was chosen by fightingirishwire, but still.
Well they lost to 4 of the other teams on their schedule last year so I wouldn’t assume they only have to worry about those 3 teams. It’s not irregular for them to have a tough game against ASU, Cal, or Stanford. Winning is hard.If the preseason rankings are based on where they think USC will finish... #4 isn't completely ridiculous. Not sure how them and Michigan both secured the easiest conference schedules I've ever seen. USC just has to go 2-1 against UCLA, Utah, and ND to go 11-1. 10 wins is a near lock.
I hear you, BKWell they lost to 4 of the other teams on their schedule last year so I wouldn’t assume they only have to worry about those 3 teams. It’s not irregular for them to have a tough game against ASU, Cal, or Stanford. Winning is hard.
They brought in a ton of offensive linemen a cycle ago if I recall, but it was all three star talent or worse I think. I'm sure some of them will pan out, but you gotta figure it'll be some time before they get talent in the trenches. They'll have the skill players of course, but they're probably going to need to rely on quick passing attacks. I don't seem them getting physical and pushing us around. They will probably still dominate the PAC-12 for the most part.
They've had a lot of issues with Stanford recently. That could be a potential early L.If the preseason rankings are based on where they think USC will finish... #4 isn't completely ridiculous. Not sure how them and Michigan both secured the easiest conference schedules I've ever seen. USC just has to go 2-1 against UCLA, Utah, and ND to go 11-1. 10 wins is a near lock.
I was going to make this same point. Of course, landing a skill position guy like Addison is going to prop up their hype and expectations but when push comes to shove, games on Saturday's (or Fridays because the PAC 12 is garbage lol) are ultimately decided in the trenches.They brought in a ton of offensive linemen a cycle ago if I recall, but it was all three star talent or worse I think. I'm sure some of them will pan out, but you gotta figure it'll be some time before they get talent in the trenches. They'll have the skill players of course, but they're probably going to need to rely on quick passing attacks. I don't seem them getting physical and pushing us around. They will probably still dominate the PAC-12 for the most part.
Riley was a best case scenario hire for us. USC gets it hype back without actually addressing any of its perennial weaknesses, so we get more credit for beating them each year without the Trojans seriously threatening our recent domination.Riley is just a rich man's Clay Helton. USC has been running on elite offensive skill talent and mediocrity elsewhere. I don't think Riley is the guy to change that.
For all their attempts to relive the Pete Carroll days, USC seems to have forgotten that they reached their heights with a defensive coach who shored up the program's weaknesses rather than augmenting its strengths. They don't need Lincoln Riley to have a great offense but they might need a Brent Venables to to complement it with a great defense.
Will see, too early to tell. All we know is that, in his first game, Lincoln Riley scored more points in a game than Notre Dame ever put up in the Brian Kelly era. Yea against rice, but ND has had its share of cupcakes. An elite, modern offense is a pre-requisite to compete, we won’t have one of those anytime soon.USC stands no fucking chance against this D.
The secondary looked really nice against fucking elite WRs and a better QB than USC. And OSU played hard
USC will be soft ass pushovers per normal.
If the O sorts things out (and gets more dynamic)I'm actually predicting a 3 score win, easily
USC folds once they get hit. Rice can't hit. Or guard. You can't use that. No way Lincoln Riley has the depth or culture change this year.Will see, too early to tell. All we know is that, in his first game, Lincoln Riley scored more points in a game than Notre Dame ever put up in the Brian Kelly era. Yea against rice, but ND has had its share of cupcakes. An elite, modern offense is a pre-requisite to compete, we won’t have one of those anytime soon.