GATTACA!
It's about to get gross
- Messages
- 15,113
- Reaction score
- 12,949
Charlie Partridge Pitt
I pick this one just to piss off Narduzzi.
Charlie Partridge Pitt
Some DL coaches who I like.
Ian Scott central Michigan 4th in the nation in sacks and played in the NFL.
Charlie Partridge Pitt
Brian Early Houston
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2012-08-21-ct-met-zorich-resolution-20120821-story.html
This would likely rule Zorich out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Being a good college football coach isn't something that just happens because you are football savvy. You first have to know if you even want to be a college football coach and Zorich himself has no idea if he wants to be one. At one point, Bryant Young thought he wanted to be a college football coach... and then decided he didn't after giving it a try.
Until Zorich actually tries coaching he has no idea if he'll like it. That's why almost all of them start as GAs first, or analysts now that analysts are common. They don't start out as position coaches at the highest level right off the bat. Bad idea.
To be fair, Bryant Young quit coaching college in 2012 because he wanted to spend more time with family. He did start coaching again in the NFL in 2017 for a few years as the Falcons DL coach. He did that till 2019 when he stepped down once again for family time. So I don't think it was so much he didn't want to be a coach, he just had different priorities at the time.
It's fair to bring up his coaching stints but I think you've proven my point (my point about Young, not necessarily my overall point). Coaching off and on for a total of 3 years out of the last 9 pretty much proves he didn't really want to be a coach. All coaches have families. Coaches who really like coaching find a way to balance coaching and family life. It's a big part of the profession. If family becomes a conflicting priority where you have to choose one or the other then, obviously, coaching isn't for that person. And that's fine. Not everyone is made out to be a coach. But many don't know that about themselves unless they actually try doing it first. It certainly looks like that's what BY found out about himself.
So, what is your argument???? All you can do is post a quote???? Story???? Article???? Have you not read other posts in this Forum that also suggests that Zorich could/would be a good hire???
Make a solid argument brother and I will listen to it. It can't be because one has a Charity that has members that have fooked the business.... Cripes.... people blamed BK for a death... you have to come on stronger than that.
Explain to me why Zorich would have the experience to coach defense today? I know very little of his accolades or credentials.
If it is Belk or Mason, I really hope Belk is the guy for the job and ND lands him. Then it comes down to the DL coach and you have a staff ready to roll.
The heavy recruiting gains are going to have to happen on offense, however, for ND to get where they and we want them to go.
ND needs to recruit better on the D line too. The Freeman Factor is starting to reap dividends when you look at '23. But still, the D line is nowhere near what it needs to be to win a playoff game. ND has 1 Foskey and Georgia has 8.
They need a QB and receivers. If an significant upgrade needs to happen for them to win a Championship, that's it.
Championship teams always have an elite D line. Bama, OSU, UGA, Clemson, every single one of those teams had elite pass rushers.
ND hasn't signed a top 100 D line recruit in like 10 years.
This is not a good look.
Explain to me why Zorich would have the experience to coach defense today? I know very little of his accolades or credentials. Where did this come from?
lol same as Todd Lyght and Autry Denson so
Championship teams also need to score points. Notre Dame has been to two semifinals and scored a combined 17 points.
You want to be elite everywhere, obviously, but at the end of the day I want an offense that can play against those varsity DL.
Even with the offenses of today, defense still wins championships.
lol same as Todd Lyght and Autry Denson so
Absolutely false. Example: Team A has the #1 defense and the #65 offense. Team B has the #1 offense and the #65 defense. If those two teams faced off in the national title game, Team B is winning 8 times out of 10 because under the present rules, elite offenses cannot be stopped, while average offenses can be. Maybe they'll change the rules someday to stop favoring offenses so heavily, but until that happens, I'd take an elite QB and NFL WRs over a beefy 3-4 defensive front that can't be run on every day of the week.
I think you're mostly right but is that 8/10 estimate actually based in credible analysis?
Elite defenses disrupt really good offenses and change games in bizarre ways (turnovers, flipping field, impacting 3rd down calling of what would otherwise be passes, etc.). I think you're more right than wrong but elite defenses cause havoc and average offenses can muster points.
Let it go bruh. LolEven with the offenses of today, defense still wins championships.
"At this rate we may have to offer Coach Driskel a job!" - Driskel anonymously posting on his own message board, probably