Unless you are a through and through City fan (prior to the take over), rooting for them is rooting for everything that is wrong with European club football today.
With that being said, come on Bayern and COYS
Naw, Man City has a rich benefactor who wants to use his money to win. That's what happens in the real world. If you have money, you can do what you want with it. The real problem is the folks who buy clubs, saddle them with debt and then fleece them. Think Hicks and Gillett at Liverpool. You can't tell people how to spend their money. If they want to pony up £1 billion to buy a team, make them competitive, then that's what they are allowed to do with their money. That's what City did, the Sheik spent £1 Billion of his own money to get City the players and infrastructure to be the best, and it's worked. Roman at Chavski is another example. He may finally get his holy grail this year. I only have a problem when people ruin clubs; that's the problem, because of leveraged takeovers.
I get it, it's not fair to other teams, but if they were Man City then they'd be all for it. It's a double standard. The idea that FFP is going to all of a sudden make mid-table to low-table clubs competitive with the big boys is ludicrous, it's about marketing and expanding your fan base to get the revenue flowing in to be able to spend it under FFP. The mid to low level clubs still won't be able to compete because they can't spend what they don't have coming in. Not to mention loop holes as in sponsors and stadium naming rights. It's just not going to happen, you can't tell people how to spend their money. What UEFA needs to do is protect the long-term viability of a club so owners can't buy, fleece, and run. Liverpool, the most decorated club in England, almost went into administration because of those types of practices. So in that regard I support it, but in a capitalist society, which is primarily what Europe and UEFA operate under, you don't tell people how to infuse cash into their business.
If you're looking out for the club and making sure the owners are not debt financing, like Real and Barca, then I get it. They are operating in one of the most debt-ridden countries in Europe though, so it's just normal for them. But the minute UEFA thinks they are going to tell a major club they can't participate in the CL, you're going to see the dissolution of UEFA, because it won't just be one club that doesn't meet the standard, it will be a multitude of clubs, and they won't stand for it. So UEFA will cease to be profitable when the largest clubs in the world take their balls and leave.
***EDIT***
Just as an aside, I like the Bundesliga model, where they discourage rich benefactors and have the fans own 51% of the clubs. So maybe UEFA should look to that in order to build a better model, because FFP as is will solve nothing in my estimation. I get that people are upset with sugar daddies, but that's life, look at Microsoft, Wal-Mart, and every other major corporation. And despite all of the Bundesliga's advancement with a FFP format, Bayern Munich still dominates that league. It's about fans and revenue, and if you don't have the global fanbase like Manchester United, Arsenal, Liverpool, Real Madrid, Barca, Bayern Munich, Milan, and Juventus, then you will not be able to compete with them financially, they simply have far too many resources and revenue streams.