T Town Tommy
Alabama Bag Man
- Messages
- 6,278
- Reaction score
- 2,768
SEC Commissioner Roy Kramer set up divisions, strategic scheduling, and a conference championship game to give one or more of his teams a definitive advantage in the polls preceding bowl selection. He coupled that with the extensive bowl tie-ins. The purpose was to stop C0-Champions like BYU but to stop Notre Dame from jumping Alabama (or any other SEC) team on New Year's Day and jumping from #5 to #1 and winning the NC.
If you can't beat 'em, box 'em out.
If one team can play a 13 game schedule everybody should have the option.
And yet the very first SEC championship game would have knocked out Alabama if they would have lost to Florida. They didn't and went on to beat Miami in the NCG. Your argument doesn't hold a lot of water. Kramer didn't give a damn about ND when coming up with the SEC CG scenerio. He took the risk of adding the game at a time when the risk heavily outweighed the rewards. And many other SECCG's have had the ability to knock out an SEC team from national title contention.
If ND is so concerned about CCGs, then join a conference. If the Big 12 expands and has a CCG, then ND is going to be at a disadvantage now. The only one blocking ND is... ND. ND seems to want the best of both worlds here. Don't want to join a conference primarily due to the revenue sharing that would be imposed on them but want to complain because the system is unfair. ND had the absolute best deal under the BCS model as one could get. Under the new system it appears they may not. Join a conference or be prepared to have to go undefeated most years to make the four team format.
).