irish4ever
Well-known member
- Messages
- 3,793
- Reaction score
- 896
Now being reported as 10 years and 9.5 mil not 10 and 10 or 15 mil
Regardless what it actually is. how is that traitor prick going to pay his bills being he's so under paid?
Now being reported as 10 years and 9.5 mil not 10 and 10 or 15 mil
Flint leaving is not good at all. But it’s also probably in the “necessary evil” category if he’s getting their head strength spot and Balis is staying
Now being reported as 10 years and 9.5 mil not 10 and 10 or 15 mil
Now being reported as 10 years and 9.5 mil not 10 and 10 or 15 mil
Only thing that worries me is Elston has been with BK from his MAC days.....I expect him to follow to LSU
Rooting against LSU in the SEC every week is going to be so fun.
Here's my guess on everything: Kelly and ND had agreed to some form of Kelly retiring at ND within the next few years plan with some of the newly injected blood taking over, back in 2016 this made sense to Kelly and all involved, but then he goes out and succeeds beyond even Kelly's expectations. Now he's invigorated with the desire to keep on as the head boss, but the powers that be know that the only way to keep Freeman and probably just get him here in the first place (the game-changer) is if he becomes HC eventually and sooner than later as people are already calling to gauge his interest in big time jobs like VT. ND tries to tell Kelly that they have to stick to the original script but he thinks he's got more than a few years and sees this somewhat forced end to his career as a bit of a slight. LSU comes in offering big cash and for it to be his show and his show alone and the rest is history.
Kelly will try to keep what he has determined to be his crew at ND (the guys who have a history with him prior to 2016 and/or who he believes are irreplaceable ie Elston, Tommy, etc.), but there are going to be those that are loyal more to Freeman than Kelly (Mickens) and some who know if they stick around they will get promoted internally at least for the time being. (Maybe Elston and Taylor)
The ND admin aren't going to be happy having to promote Freeman sooner than expected, but I think that's what they feel they have to do. They also won't like that a guy like Fickell is out there who would be big, but I think they believe continuity with our recruiting efforts and culture is key. And if you hire Fickell (as good of a hire as that would be) Freeman is outta here and so is half the team and recruits. You have to think, you didn't just fire a guy, you're headed to the playoffs AGAIN (in what was supposed to be a rebuilding year) and your recruiting is on a new level. There is nothing needing to be fixed that you need to hire a "culture changer" or "program builder" like Fickell.
He thinks he can win a title at LSU. They will give him anything he needs to do it. You don’t even need to be a great recruiter there because every HS stud in Louisiana has loyalty to LSU for whatever reason.
irony would be ND getting into the Playoff this year and winning it.
BK never talked to Swarbrick about the other interests and never gave ND a chance to match. This is mind boggling to me.
It's not really. He didn't want to play ND vs. LSU, he wanted a change of pace before retirement. He looks at Saban and believe he's his equal in everything except the ability to attract any 5 star he wants. He now has no excuses and bet on himself in a different atmosphere.
Now we're all betting on ND being able to take another step. The next coach will be handsomely rewarded and set up with a very well-stocked football team. We need a dynamic recruiter and developer.
I was cautiously optimistic this morning after Assaf's townhall, our assumptions about Freeman getting announced quickly, etc.
Swarbrick's presser destroyed all of that. Maybe he was just refusing to be pinned down on the meaningful stuff, but it looks like the administration was comically unprepared for Kelly's departure despite warning signs, and that they're willing to let the recruiting class fall apart while they run an old-fashioned "head coaching search". Un-f*cking-believable.
I picked up on that as well and share the same thoughts. It sounded like Tim O'Malley tried to get JS to clarify something he said too but Jack still side stepped it. Did I hear him correctly in the beginning say that if they did name an interim coach, that person likely wouldn't be a candidate for the HC position?
I picked up on that as well and share the same thoughts. It sounded like Tim O'Malley tried to get JS to clarify something he said too but Jack still side stepped it. Did I hear him correctly in the beginning say that if they did name an interim coach, that person likely wouldn't be a candidate for the HC position?
Can anyone give me a brief synopsis of what JS said in his presser? TYIA