As a casual viewer of these movies, it felt a little heavy handed.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4jgQPDRGucc" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
As someone that is a huge Back to the Future fan, and time travel plots in general, I get that some people weren't going to appreciate Endgame's version. Keep in mind that we are talking about a fictitious concept though, and just because other movies have established rules doesn't mean Avengers need to adhere to them. That said, I did have a beef with the time travel stuff, but it was only related to how quickly they were able to figure out the principle and perfect it. I mentioned that before, but I also acknowledge that the process was likely sped up to shorten an already lengthy movie.I love Marvel movies, and loved Infinity Wars, but I gave this one an A- for initial watchability, but a B on further reflection. I really did think the rules they set up for time travel were a little too convenient and not very fun or satisfying. If there are other timelines everytime you change something, sucks for them.
It was never about murder, it was giving up what you love most. For Thanos that just happened to be Gamora.I liked Black Widow's sacrifice, and thought it made MUCH more sense that you didn't have to murder someone to get the soul stone.
I thought that Thor's story line made sense on paper, but they got carried away with the execution and ended up being ham-fisted. The depression of a 1,000 year old warrior of having failed his ultimate mission would have been darker than ice cream, beer, and Fortnight. Entertaining, but too silly.
I agree with most of what you said, save for the below:
As someone that is a huge Back to the Future fan, and time travel plots in general, I get that some people weren't going to appreciate Endgame's version. Keep in mind that we are talking about a fictitious concept though, and just because other movies have established rules doesn't mean Avengers need to adhere to them. That said, I did have a beef with the time travel stuff, but it was only related to how quickly they were able to figure out the principle and perfect it. I mentioned that before, but I also acknowledge that the process was likely sped up to shorten an already lengthy movie.
It was never about murder, it was giving up what you love most. For Thanos that just happened to be Gamora.
Endgame Thor was a treasure, you back off! I think Thor is my favorite Avenger after Iron Man. His speech and ignorance of Earth's culture make for some good comedy.
In Infinity War, what we were told that the stone demanded a sacrifice, you must lose someone you love. The stone came at a cost. It was a soul for a soul. We left that movie with the impression that the universe was willing to let a fanatical Father murder his child to get the stone, which was a pretty crazy view of love. It did not demand what or who you loved the most--or else Black Widow's sacrifice would not have worked for Clint. Clint loved his wife and kids more.
My problem was I thought the stone demanded a sacrifice. Clint never sacrificed BW. He tried as hard as he could to not let her die. That was good enough, which was much less creepy.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4jgQPDRGucc" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
My take away is that, despite what Gamora thought, Thanos did really love her as a daughter. His mind is twisted, but she was what he loved. His resolve to fulfill his "destiny" allowed him to give her up. That's why when he went through that flash back and she asked him as a child "What did you have to give up?" he replied "Everything."
As far as Clint and Black Widow, I think it's obvious there was a love there. It may have been more platonic than anything, but they have a long history going back to "Budapest" or whatever that crap was they always brought up. In any case, they had a close relationship. If you consider that Clint had already lost his family, Black Widow would be the thing he loved most.
Also not a big fan of what they are doing with Thor, almost as if he is a comic relief now.
End battle I thought could have been longer for how long the movie itself was.
Still not sold on Captain Marvel.
Anyone else think the kid from Iron Man 3 will take up the role of the new Iron Man?
Just got to the theatre to see it on Friday. Absolutely hated this. I'm probably a little bias as Thor was my favorite comic book hero growing up but that seemed really stupid. One of the most powerful Marvel heroes is now relegated to an extremely overweight/out of shape drunk with jokes. Stupid.
Among the original Avengers, Thor has always been the one more likely to provide the comic relief though. He's powerful, but he's not completely familiar with Earth customs and ignorance is part of his charm. He has one of the most compelling character arcs by the end though, probably the 2nd best arc in the whole movie beyond Tony's own redemption and selflessness. Thor was completely broken after failing to stop Thanos. He lost his home, his family, even his hammer. It looked like he had lost all hope, if not for a chance encounter with his mother in the past. He snaps out of his funk and they take the fight to Thanos. By the end of the movie he's back to his old self again.
In the end, I think you need to consider they actually made his character more likeable than some fan favorites like Cap imo. Plus...they could have gone far worse with Thor if they stayed true to the comic books. Remember when Thor became a woman?
![]()
So people with kids... how did they like it? I thought it was alright, but I thought about how I would feel if I was an 8 year old after the first hour and realized I'd be bored/depressed out of my mind.
Yeah, i thought it was creepy that the soul stone was thinking, "he may want to kill half the universe, but that doesn't mean that he isn't capable of lovin' that girl!"
My point with Clint was that it didn't have to be your most beloved and it didn't even have to be fully willed. He did not consent to her dying.
It's PG-13 so it's not like toddlers are going to watch it. I don't think teenagers would be bored IMO.
What was really creepy is “Did Captain make out with his daughter in Civil War?” Remember, he kissed Sharon Carter in that movie.
So people with kids... how did they like it? I thought it was alright, but I thought about how I would feel if I was an 8 year old after the first hour and realized I'd be bored/depressed out of my mind.
I didn't ask about toddlers? A PG13 rating isn't going to keep out the millions of eight to ten year olds who pretend to be these characters everyday on the playground because these movies are their generations Star Wars. I was just struck in the theater that 9 year old grey would've been hyped as hell going in, and then would have watched an hour of Captain America going to group therapy and teaching a gay man to trust again. I was just curious how that played for people with kids in that age range, because I thought it was pretty bloated as an adult.
It's PG-13 so it's not like toddlers are going to watch it. I don't think teenagers would be bored IMO.
Similarly Man of Steel got a 7.1 on IMDB which puts it up there with Iron Man 2, Ant Man and Wasp, and near Black Panther (lolwut?), but the Metascore for Man of Steel was just 55 which was also in line with it's mixed reviews and it also matched it's 56% Rotten Tomatoes score.
Cap one is better than a 6.9. Also the Incredible Hulk shouldn't count.
The Cap movies are very good, the best of the core 4's series. Thor 1 and 2 are forgettable as is Iron Man 2.
I didn't think that Cap 1 would stand up well over time, but I still highly enjoyed it after a few years. Pretty straightforward superhero movie though.