So we know who the #1 & #2 QB's are and Kelly want's to have a "special package" for 1 of the other 2 QB's. Who you think gets the call for the special pacakge? I want to see Hendrix get some playing time this year.
Kelly's portraying this "competition" to be much closer than it actually is, just as he did with Crist and Rees.
The only type of "special package" that makes sense for one of our two young dual threat QBs is a red zone package that threatens a QB run on every play; think Tim Tebow as a freshman. As the bigger QB with more time in Kelly's system, Hendrix has a big advantage when asked to play the red zone battering ram.
Also, despite Kelly's protestations to the contrary, burning a year of Golson's eligibility seems stupid unless he's playing a lot or making a key contribution. Splitting time with another QB situationally doesn't qualifty.
Oh, and Hendrix is the #1 transfer risk on the team. If he feels like Golson has passed him, he may bolt. Assuming Kelly wants to keep him, that's yet another reason to make Hendrix the sole "change of pace" option.
Kelly's portraying this "competition" to be much closer than it actually is, just as he did with Crist and Rees.
The only type of "special package" that makes sense for one of our two young dual threat QBs is a red zone package that threatens a QB run on every play; think Tim Tebow as a freshman. As the bigger QB with more time in Kelly's system, Hendrix has a big advantage when asked to play the red zone battering ram.
Also, despite Kelly's protestations to the contrary, burning a year of Golson's eligibility seems stupid unless he's playing a lot or making a key contribution. Splitting time with another QB situationally doesn't qualifty.
Oh, and Hendrix is the #1 transfer risk on the team. If he feels like Golson has passed him, he may bolt. Assuming Kelly wants to keep him, that's yet another reason to make Hendrix the sole "change of pace" option.
Kelly's portraying this "competition" to be much closer than it actually is, just as he did with Crist and Rees.
The only type of "special package" that makes sense for one of our two young dual threat QBs is a red zone package that threatens a QB run on every play; think Tim Tebow as a freshman. As the bigger QB with more time in Kelly's system, Hendrix has a big advantage when asked to play the red zone battering ram.
Also, despite Kelly's protestations to the contrary, burning a year of Golson's eligibility seems stupid unless he's playing a lot or making a key contribution. Splitting time with another QB situationally doesn't qualifty.
Oh, and Hendrix is the #1 transfer risk on the team. If he feels like Golson has passed him, he may bolt. Assuming Kelly wants to keep him, that's yet another reason to make Hendrix the sole "change of pace" option.
I think Golson is too talented to waste a year of eligibility. Assuming Crist stays for a fifth year, that'll allow for either Rees or Hendrix to start the 2013 season and also Golson to have two years as a starter. Of course, Golson could also rocket up the depth chart and start his junior year, giving him three years like Crist.
Seems like many people are talking as if Rees doesn't even exist. To my mind, unless he blows it big in a game this season or gets injured, he is odds on ND's starting QB next year. Sure, anything can happen and Golson and/or Hendrix could catch fire and surpass Rees, but it seems odd how, after Rees stepped in and performed pretty well as a true freshmen, many people are already writing him off.
Seems like many people are talking as if Rees doesn't even exist. To my mind, unless he blows it big in a game this season or gets injured, he is odds on ND's starting QB next year. Sure, anything can happen and Golson and/or Hendrix could catch fire and surpass Rees, but it seems odd how, after Rees stepped in and performed pretty well as a true freshmen, many people are already writing him off.
As for me, I was going along with the title of the thread.
The discussion here is more about two quarterbacks that are truly built to run BKs offense.
I have a lot of respect for Rees and if he wins the job in the future I'll trust that the coaches are doing what's best.
In all honesty, I am surprised that Rees is even #2. And trust me, I'm not trying to get down on the kid. He earned all the respect I can give last year. I just don't see the BCS caliber QB from him. I don't have a single idea how much better Rees does in practice to make Kelly give him the nod, but based on what I have "seen" (Granted Hendrix was only Spring Game), Hendrix looks to be superior.
In all honesty, I am surprised that Rees is even #2. And trust me, I'm not trying to get down on the kid. He earned all the respect I can give last year. I just don't see the BCS caliber QB from him. I don't have a single idea how much better Rees does in practice to make Kelly give him the nod, but based on what I have "seen" (Granted Hendrix was only Spring Game), Hendrix looks to be superior.
Golson very well could be the future, and probably is, but from what I have "seen" (again from the Spring Game), he is still very raw. He needs to have the game slow down so that he can just react naturally instead of trying to think about stuff, and that just takes time.
Here we go again.......
Everyone wants to crown the next "up and coming" guy to be a star, before he has taken even ONE meaningful snap......
Potential and upside don't mean jack, folks. Results are what counts. Rees has results, Hendrix doesn't. I really don't care how well they can run. Do you people even listen to Kelly's pressers? He's already said that a QB doesn't have to be a runner, to run his offense. All he needs is some escapability. Rees wasn't Tony Rice last year, but he wasn't exactly Bernie Kosar either. Quit prognosticating based on your own personal wants, and listen and watch what is going on around you. Rees has the same amount of time in Kelly's system as Hendrix. He's already gotten meaningful (and successful) game time. Hendrix, according to some of you, is a way better QB than Rees. So which is more likely?
A.) Brian Kelly is an idiot, for putting Rees in front of Hendrix on the depth chart.
or
B.) Some of you are just flat wrong about Hendrix being better than Rees.
While I agree with your point kmoose... I believe BK has said in past interviews, that he has had to "alter" his offense to be more suiting to Rees' skill set
I agree that Rees' in-game experience is priceless compared to what Hendrix/Golson have been through, however with more reps, and perhaps some "garbage time" snaps this season, to kind of help either of them along in the mental/game speed side of things... Who knows?
BK has stated before that guys like Golson/Hendrix are ideal for running his optimal type of offense
I've never heard Kelly say that he had to alter his offense for Rees' "skill set". I've heard him say that Rees couldn't run everything in Kelly's offense. But I'm pretty certain that Kelly meant that Rees didn't know all of the playbook yet. Kelly has stated before that guys like Golson/Hendrix are ideal for running his optimal type of offense... and yet Kelly still put Rees ahead of them on the depth chart. So, according to the "Golson/Hendrix are obviously better than Rees" campers, Kelly is an absolute moron?