NorthDakota
Grandson of Loomis
- Messages
- 15,707
- Reaction score
- 6,014
Basically, when you tell your sheep every chance you get that any opposing view is literally evil and any response is warrented....
As someone who are aware of issues, list five items with which you agree with the "other side".
Mine:
1. Reduce federal spending
2. Balance the federal budget
3. Tax relief for the middle class
4. Reduce healthcare costs
5. Make America safer
You?
1. Minimize military intervention overseas.As someone who are aware of issues, list five items with which you agree with the "other side".
Mine:
1. Reduce federal spending
2. Balance the federal budget
3. Tax relief for the middle class
4. Reduce healthcare costs
5. Make America safer
You?
There’s loons on both sides but looking at the Federal makeup of Reps & Dems, I’d say the 2nd biggest trick the devil ever pulled off was convincing us voters that there’s a dime’s worth of difference between them.
Eff ‘em all & feed ‘em fish heads.
I've said numerous times I lean left on a number of issues and have been a Democrat for a larger portion of my life than I was ever Republican. I'm currently independent and have been for nearly a decade. An issue I have currently is even when I share a stance with the left the messenger kills the message often times, too shrill and see through in the endless attempt to politicize and score chess board points... never let a crisis go to waste stuff. Even when I agree with the point I find myself turned off by the tactics.
I remember and consider you like most of the rest of us. YJ has said the same. Your five?
1. Minimize military intervention overseas.
2. Legalize marijuana.
3. No warrantless surveillance.
4. Demilitarize local police.
5. End corporate welfare.
As someone who are aware of issues, list five items with which you agree with the "other side".
Mine:
1. Reduce federal spending
2. Balance the federal budget
3. Tax relief for the middle class
4. Reduce healthcare costs
5. Make America safer
You?
I would consider myself left of center on:
1.) Environmental issues
2.) Gun Control
3.) Military spending
4.) Drugs: decimalization and/or reduced sentencing for
5.) Foreign Aid, Foreign military presence and immigration are all things I have both left and right leaning stances on depending on what layer of the onion we are focused on in the moment.
I think the Left is pro-military spending but just doesn't like to talk about it... The lobbyist are just as entrenched there as the right.
I think the left's leadership is like that on most issues honestly. They love to say they're are fighting for one thing but actually working towards the opposite. One thing about the Republican leaders, you pretty much know what you are getting imo. For this little list though I'm trying to speak more to the conscience of the voting base than the leadership of either party... if that makes sense. Hard to do in this climate but yeah...
No dog in this fight.
I only hope for the truth and good law.
I was sent this link and found it quite shocking and plausible. This cannot be good for Due Process. Lots of interesting observations in the Comments section. Any thoughts?
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...-together-during-accusation-letter-construct/
Cheers and Go Irish!!
That's interesting stuff. So, she's one of the "beach friends" that BF mentioned.
While tin foilish in some areas, the simple stuff begs to be explored.
I don't disagree but connect the dots and what are the odds?
This whole thing is a mess... by accident or design? I feel sorry for what we have become as people.
Cheers and Go Irish!!
I think it pretty obvious this was a hatchet job from the get go and it's crumbling accordingly... one has to be a pretty strong shill for the left to be clinging to what we know at this point and still be on team Milano.
I'm a little surprised they are stepping out from behind their make believe "non-bias" facade.
![]()
Frankly not surprised at all
Free health care for all (not the Obama model)
I agree that the US healthcare needs fixing but I’ve come to believe that it’s not the quality/cost of healthcare b/c we could give everyone gold-plated healthcare but it won’t mean a thing until Americans stop shoving Type-2 Diabetes inducing junk down their gullets.
Healthcare ain’t fixing the population w/ the worst eating habits of any first world country
I agree that the US healthcare needs fixing but I’ve come to believe that it’s not the quality/cost of healthcare b/c we could give everyone gold-plated healthcare but it won’t mean a thing until Americans stop shoving Type-2 Diabetes inducing junk down their gullets.
Healthcare ain’t fixing the population w/ the worst eating habits of any first world country
I would consider myself left of center on:
1.) Environmental issues
2.) Gun Control
3.) Military spending
4.) Drugs: decimalization and/or reduced sentencing for
5.) Foreign Aid, Foreign military presence and immigration are all things I have both left and right leaning stances on depending on what layer of the onion we are focused on in the moment.
My position is simple. US expenditure on HC is higher per captita than nations already providing good national health care. Why? Too many middle man money grabs, and we're subsidizing the world when it comes to drug prices (we pay more than twice the world average for the same drugs). I'm a capitalist, but HC is not the place for captitalism IMO. F the insurance companies, and F the drug companies.
It's the same deal with education. We pay more per captita than nations with much better education systems. Give people free education, and their excuses start to run out.
The other countries can only do what they do because we do what we do. When an American pharmaceutical company develops a new drug, it's sold all over the world. Americans subsidize the research and the rest of the world piggy-backs on the products like a bunch of freeloaders. If America weren't bearing the R&D costs, the R&D would stagnate. We pay a huge premium but we're paying the premium for the sake of legitimate medical breakthroughs. The profit motive applies to corporations as well as individuals. Without the "obscene" payoff at the end of a drug that works, the companies aren't going to invest the billions of dollars it costs to develop them.My position is simple. US expenditure on HC is higher per captita than nations already providing good national health care. Why? Too many middle man money grabs, and we're subsidizing the world when it comes to drug prices (we pay more than twice the world average for the same drugs). I'm a capitalist, but HC is not the place for captitalism IMO. F the insurance companies, and F the drug companies.
It's the same deal with education. We pay more per captita than nations with much better education systems. Give people free education, and their excuses start to run out.