'23 KS QB Avery Johnson (Kansas State Verbal)

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,120
Reaction score
27,376
I guess I didn't realize that it needed to be said that we're trusting the coaches to make the right decision. Felt that was assumed. Obviously, if they don't, we won't get the desired results but we likely wouldn't regardless of how they approached it.

In general, increasing competition should lead to better results. Hence, Freeman's "Challenge Everything" motto.

Convenient.
 

ColinKSU

Well-known member
Messages
4,647
Reaction score
6,163
Last 3 national championships...

Stetson Bennett: walk-on
Mac Jones: 3-star (composite)
Joe Burrow: transfer
When Notre Dame has a roster at every other position like 2021 Georgia, 2020 Alabama and 2019 LSU, then we can totally have that discussion. Until then, the road to a title for ND is gonna look more like Clemson landing a transcendent QB in Watson or Lawrence.
 

317Irish

Grits are a$$
Messages
1,208
Reaction score
1,053
Convenient.
Putting aside the transfer limitations at ND just a little, if we bring in 3 QB transfers this off-season that are at least somewhat program fits, and all of them appear to be able to compete for QB1 at ND, are you really going to tell me it’s a failed model if Buchner, Pyne, and Angeli all transfer out because of it?
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,120
Reaction score
27,376
Putting aside the transfer limitations at ND just a little, if we bring in 3 QB transfers this off-season that are at least somewhat program fits, and all of them appear to be able to compete for QB1 at ND, are you really going to tell me it’s a failed model if Buchner, Pyne, and Angeli all transfer out because of it?

I’m not anti transfer of a QB. I’ve advocated for 1 - 2 in the other thread. What I don’t see why Tennessee is suddenly this model to success though. They might accomplish what we have the last 5 years.

Kirby Smart was all anti transfer portal right after that game. The coach we should look to maybe. Georgia took none. Let that cancer Jermaine Burton walk. If Freeman rides the Kirby side of the road I’ll take that. I obviously agree with any sentiment of take the right guys, but the more you take, the more you get wrong, and I don’t expect to land a Heisman finalist in the portal often. If we praise the extreme good (Hooker) I’m gonna also notice the extreme bad (Tennessee pass D)
 

Luckylucci

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
27,770
Reaction score
10,153
In 2019 Kirby Smart added 2 QB's, 1 Juco transfer walk-on and 1 HS recruit. He followed that up with 1 HS recruit and 3 transfers in 2020. 6 QB's over 2 years.

2 years later the walk-on was winning a national championship.

Same model. Bring in guys that you think can play and figure it out while they're here.
 
Last edited:

indianamouse

Just a simple man
Messages
646
Reaction score
733
So, two 1st round picks and a guy who led a team with 19 5* players. Just for reference, we’ve signed 17 5* kids this millennium.

We need a 1st round talent at QB. I don’t really think anyone cares how we get one.
Tbf. You think Mac jones is a first round pick without all the talent around him? I’m not really all that impressed by him.
 

Jimmy3Putt

KooL
Messages
5,776
Reaction score
6,689
If I'm Freeman, I would most definitely consider taking 2 QB's between now and next season. Ideally it's a '23 signee and a transfer but if they aren't going to land a '23 guy they like then most definitely take 2 transfers. All in on fixing the QB position takes all in moves.

Now, we won't be keeping 6 QB's on scholarship into next season but if we can get 5-6 legitimate options at QB, to compete this Spring and Summer, then we should most definitely do it.
Why would two guys transfer in?
They're transferring out because of no playing time.
 

NDRock

Well-known member
Messages
7,489
Reaction score
5,448
Tbf. You think Mac jones is a first round pick without all the talent around him? I’m not really all that impressed by him.
Yeah, same with me. QBs obviously get way over drafted just because of the importance of the position. He’s probably a 3rd round talent (like a lot of 1st round QB selections).
 

Reaper97

Banned
Messages
3,109
Reaction score
4,226
on3 had an article saying he could flip to Texas A&M fwiw
Go look at the A&M On3 page.
They have zero members.
All the posts are by the mods.
So they are always throwing out pro-A&M stuff to try to get subscriptions & they have the A&M site mods always doing national articles (since they have nothing to do on their own site).
 

Irish du Nord

Well-known member
Messages
3,417
Reaction score
3,066
When Notre Dame has a roster at every other position like 2021 Georgia, 2020 Alabama and 2019 LSU, then we can totally have that discussion. Until then, the road to a title for ND is gonna look more like Clemson landing a transcendent QB in Watson or Lawrence.
2018 Clemson had 5 defensive starters drafted in the first round. They were just like the above three, even with the transcendent QB they wouldn’t have won without that incredible defense.
 

NDRock

Well-known member
Messages
7,489
Reaction score
5,448
2018 Clemson had 5 defensive starters drafted in the first round. They were just like the above three, even with the transcendent QB they wouldn’t have won without that incredible defense.
You’re skipping Clemson’s 1st title team which is more in line what ND is capable of doing. If you look at their talent composite they were 9th overall with four 5* kids. A level ND has been around in the past. They had five kids drafted that year other than Deshaun. One in the 1st (WR), a 3rd, and three 4th rounders.
 

irishandy

Well-known member
Messages
4,340
Reaction score
1,962
I think ND should take 1 QB from the transfer portal.

Who is left on the board for the 23 class at QB? Don't offer a kid just to get a QB in the class.

ND was successful with Coan last year, LSU is successful with Daniels this year. Grab 1 because it is a hard sell to get 2 due to playing time.

If any of our QB's leave because of a transfer it would be Buchner. Pyne has too much time invested, if I am ND I get Angeli more and more ready, and Buchner is injury prone & played 1 total year of high school football. You can bring up Buchner's ceiling and how good he can be, but I haven't seen it.
 

Irish du Nord

Well-known member
Messages
3,417
Reaction score
3,066
You’re skipping Clemson’s 1st title team which is more in line what ND is capable of doing. If you look at their talent composite they were 9th overall with four 5* kids. A level ND has been around in the past. They had five kids drafted that year other than Deshaun. One in the 1st (WR), a 3rd, and three 4th rounders.
But the talent level of the second Clemson championship was way higher, especially when based on draft picks rather star ratings. I only disagree with the lumping in of the second Clemson title with “The Clemson Model”, because we are quite a ways from having that level of talent across our roster.
 

NDRock

Well-known member
Messages
7,489
Reaction score
5,448
But the talent level of the second Clemson championship was way higher, especially when based on draft picks rather star ratings. I only disagree with the lumping in of the second Clemson title with “The Clemson Model”, because we are quite a ways from having that level of talent across our roster.
True but a lot of the talent on the '18 team came about because of the '15 and '16 teams. If ND made the championship game and won a title in back to back years, our recruiting would probably take a big step up.
 

indianamouse

Just a simple man
Messages
646
Reaction score
733
True but a lot of the talent on the '18 team came about because of the '15 and '16 teams. If ND made the championship game and won a title in back to back years, our recruiting would probably take a big step up.
I think our recruiting is already taking a step up
 

NDdomer2

Local Sports vBookie
Messages
17,050
Reaction score
3,875
i think i posted something after last year - my guess is they know that 30m+ a year isnt sustainable.

a #1 class every 3/4 years with some top15ish classes is still fielding some high level players. the on field product is just garbage right now.
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
i think i posted something after last year - my guess is they know that 30m+ a year isnt sustainable.

a #1 class every 3/4 years with some top15ish classes is still fielding some high level players. the on field product is just garbage right now.
I’m sorry but that is an utterly ass-backwards way to build a successful football program. So of course it is A&Ms approach.
 
Top