Interesting that it is even possible to organise. I would figure the committee would ignore the result otherwise others would do it.
To my point below, teams, especially playoff bubble teams crave in-season competitive matchups. And there should be a lot more of them and screw the CCGs.
At this point, SEC and BIG10 teams have a number of top conference teams that are fairly tested but in many cases are not playing enough of the top teams in their conference in a given season (I know that can be kind of random) so having more challenging OOC games legitimizes if a team is truly a contender or not.
I mean does anyone know how really good Ole Miss, Miami, and Oregon really are pre playoffs and as at-large playoff entrants (not unlike ND's annual situation)? Not really, and the playoffs will provide that litmus test, but why not have more in-season litmus tests?
After all, if you're hiding in season and you're not competitive, you're only gonna get boat raced in the playoffs anyway which is bad for everyone all the way round.
You can keep playing the best teams to see how good you are and you live with the consequences if you're not a good team, and take those results and go out and get better via coaching, development, recruiting and NIL/portal... Exactly what ND has been doing.
ND's issue tho' is that as much as we want the litmus test games, right now, not in a conference, we're not getting as many as we would like, and as I stated, many P4 teams are reconsidering even playing the OOC games, like ND would be, so that they can coast into the playoffs.
Now that CFB has moved into a more expansive playoff system, it's time to update the in-season process and quit allowing teams to hide.
The system is broken for what the P4 teams are ultimately desiring to achieve, a competitive season AND competitive playoffs.